Who's return do you think/feel is gonna be the biggest?
We might have a thread like this, but it was a while ago so I'm not gonna bother looking for it. If somebody digs one up me or another mod will merge this.
Who's return do you think will be the biggest between these four if the player stays healthy?
It's tough for me, all four bring something to the table. Stoudemire brings explosive scoring, Shumpert last season played great defense and solid offense, Camby is a rebounding beast and an excellent (beast?) shot blocker, and Wallace does a little bit of everything with toughness.
It's tough for me to the point that I don't even have a gut feeling. For fun's sake for this thread, I choose Stoudemire because of his explosive scoring, rebounding, and experience. I question his decision making and effort though because of last regular season. Shumpert I think will continue to play hard on both ends of the floor. Still though, as of now, I choose Stoudemire.
Camby + Rasheed + Amare + Shump are more important than individual performance
I think we need to get something right .. our 20 wins in 27 games came from playing veteran NBA players out of their natural position.
PF-Kurt & PF-Rasheed has been Tyson backup at center.
SF-Melo has been playing 38 minutes at the PF position with another SF-Novak as backup.
SG-Brewer & SG-JR has been playing at the SF position.
PG- Kidd has been playing the majority of the minutes at the SG position.
PG-Felton & PG-Pablo are the only players (next to Tyson) playing their original position.
Center- Tyson & Camby
PF- Amare, Rasheed & Kurt
SF- Melo, Novak & Copeland
SG- Brewer, JR & Shump
PG- Kidd, Felton & Pablo
In mid January (2013) we are expecting a Healthy Camby, Rasheed, Amare, and Shump to step into the rotation at their natural position.
Should we keep playing our players out of their natural position to keep our .700+ winning percentage?
Or will our players become complex or will they fit well playing at their natural position?
Your response is welcome ....