All I've heard the past few months from my fellow Knick fans is that we can't win unless we add a 3rd superstar...
What i don't understand is how anyone can still say that after watching the final? The mavs have 1 superstar and the series is tied up!
they might not win, but they certainly can.
So i ask, do we really need 3 superstars? What about the two guys we have and some good complimentary players? (a big man, some defenders etc..)
If we had a coach who stressed defensive principles more I could easily see us winning with "just" 2 superstars. But with MDA I really do think we need a 3rd, particularly an elite level PG who can orchestrate his offense effectively, because so much of this system is predicated on running the PnR & requires the PG to be a real floor general who is also a major threat to score. So if MDA is gonna be our coach (which it looks to me like he will be in 2012), then I think we do need a 3rd superstar, in particular CP3, if we wanna really contend for a championship. Not that it matters cuz if CP3 ends up here, it's probably after the 2012 season as a FA, which probably means MDA likely won't be here anyway.