Page 1 of 7 1234567 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 104

Thread: Knicks are better w/o STAT; trade him

  1. #1
    Veteran quiggle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,246
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Knicks are better w/o STAT; trade him and start Harrelson

    versus the Kings game this is what fluid Knicks basketball is about without him clogging the lane like Shaq did, management must work out a trade soon sometime this season before he breaks down further and we're stuck with damaged goods like what happened with Allan Houston.
    Last edited by quiggle; Dec 31, 2011 at 20:55.

  2. #2
    Evacuee Crazy⑧s's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    日本
    Posts
    6,488
    Rep Power
    27

    Default

    your mother has failed

  3. #3
    Member Knickerbocker201's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    North Jer-Z
    Posts
    90
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Originally Posted by Crazy⑧s
    your mother has failed
    Crazy8 your a trip dude.. haha nah but you can't judge one games performance on if we are better with Amare.. I think we will be fine.. Hopefully MDA does focus on defense.. and Harrellson is playing very good... He is solid on Defense and can put a body on guys...

  4. #4
    Veteran quiggle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,246
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    definitely impressed by Jorts, fresh legs and young mind is coachable he hustles like David Lee. really anyone here who thinks Statosphere is the real deal u rather take more losses with him or a good wins without him?

  5. #5
    Huge Member smokes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    4,226
    Rep Power
    19

    Default

    quiggle is kinda right in a way that right now we ARE better without STAT. It's because him and Melo have not come together yet on the floor and because we have no PG to facilitate him. Him trying to go one-on-one is frustrating and not to his strengths.

    Once things start coming together he will return to being a force offensively and defensively we can only hope for a marked improvement in effort and understanding.

  6. #6
    Veteran quiggle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,246
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    sorry man but its like Jeter and A-Rod on the Yankees, 2009 was a fluke but those two cant coexist together theyve been together 7 years and barely nothing to show for it, its not going to work out with this here, believe that. really are you waiting for STAT to really break down and just sitting there like Penny, or just hurry up and trade him at least we can get something back/

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    162
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    I like Harrelsons game.

  8. #8
    Veteran quiggle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,246
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    getting rid of Stratosphere also opens up Chandlers game hes beast tongiht

  9. #9
    Member Osiris80's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    104
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Man come on

    hes still STAT

    to a point i kinda agree but i think if anything this performance in sac was bout timing. STAT needed to see a 2nd rounder ball better than he has since game 1 v boston

    the blueprints ****ed up my homies

    come to think of it so is this thread

    so many homers saying they need time to jel but **** that **** cos you cant jel in a offensive ****storm made by a confused number crunchin coach

    where are the reactionary beatdowns from the wise on this fail thread?

  10. #10
    Veteran StEpHoN_mArBuRy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Queenz
    Posts
    3,086
    Rep Power
    15

    Default

    Originally Posted by Crazy⑧s
    your mother has failed
    LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

  11. #11
    Veteran quiggle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,246
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    some of you young muthas werent around for this but let me compare this back


    we once had an aging star like Reniassance man, creaky knees and all, his name was Patrick Ewing. the Knicks brought in soem fresh talent, at the time Houston, Sprewell, Camby, Childs when Ewing got injured in 1999 playoffs, like with Renaissance Man with this game, the team, like this team, geled better and eventually made it to the finals! but old man Ewing would not accept a lesser role and eventually was traded to the Thunder. now yall know this is going to be the same scenario with Statosphere so lets just avoid all the piggy drama now and get him while hes still not completely washed up or we end up getting garbage like Glen Rice when its too late. appreciate the one game we could have won in last year's playoffs was game 2 and is it a coindicence that is the game he didnt play in, at least the whole game

  12. #12
    Superstar WrongIslander's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Liverpool, England
    Posts
    579
    Rep Power
    5

    Default

    Stat or a PG and stronger bench?

    I know where my vote goes.

    I said CP3 and Melo would have been a better fit all along.

  13. #13
    Veteran quiggle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,246
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    CP3, Melo and Chander now thats a big three

    some of yall should snap out of this dream and stop sucking Statosphere lingam, just because he said THE KNICKS ARE BACK u act like hes some savior. the knicks are not back because of him, it was that old geezer most of yall forgot about in Indiana now that brought the Knicks back. if he didnt clear the cap he would never have signed with the Knicks and Melo, Chandler would not be here either

  14. #14
    Superstar WrongIslander's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Liverpool, England
    Posts
    579
    Rep Power
    5

    Default

    Originally Posted by quiggle
    CP3, Melo and Chander now thats a big three

    some of yall should snap out of this dream and stop sucking Statosphere lingam, just because he said THE KNICKS ARE BACK u act like hes some savior. the knicks are not back because of him, it was that old geezer most of yall forgot about in Indiana now that brought the Knicks back. if he didnt clear the cap he would never have signed with the Knicks and Melo, Chandler would not be here either
    Well said.

  15. #15
    Huge Member smokes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    4,226
    Rep Power
    19

    Default

    Don't think anyone disagrees that CP3 Melo and Tyson would be better but we have never had the chance to acquire CP3 so that's kind of a moot point.

Similar Threads

  1. Knicks will Keep Billups. Option picked up.
    By Blumatic in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 54
    Last Post: Apr 29, 2011, 13:23
  2. The Official Chris Paul to the Knicks Thread
    By Toons in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: Jul 24, 2010, 14:36
  3. Stat by Stat analysis of our 2010 Knicks
    By smokes in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: Jul 11, 2010, 15:37
  4. Knicks at Magic 3/21 7PM
    By jpz17 in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: Mar 24, 2009, 10:06
  5. Replies: 1
    Last Post: Feb 18, 2009, 20:23

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •