Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 29

Thread: If Knicks land Nash, Dwight should be next

  1. #1
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    21
    Rep Power
    0

    Default If Knicks land Nash, Dwight should be next

    Knicks could offer Lin, Chandler and a 1st rounder in 2014 for Dwight.

    Nash
    Smith/Shumpert
    Melo
    Amare
    Howard

    Wow.

  2. #2
    Veteran Paul1355's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    East Coast
    Posts
    5,497
    Rep Power
    14

    Default

    Originally Posted by titletown2010
    Knicks could offer Lin, Chandler and a 1st rounder in 2014 for Dwight.

    Nash
    Smith/Shumpert
    Melo
    Amare
    Howard

    Wow.
    How would we afford this???

    I think you are forgetting the penalty teams gets by going over the cap, that prevents teams from just using bird rights on everyone.

  3. #3
    Scoring Champ CA7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    3,869
    Rep Power
    14

    Default

    Originally Posted by Paul1355
    How would we afford this???

    I think you are forgetting the penalty teams gets by going over the cap, that prevents teams from just using bird rights on everyone.
    The penalty wont hurt us Dolan got stacks of bread but NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

    Dwight is about as bi-polar as they come, he's also dick riding D-Will.

  4. #4
    ★KNICKS-TAPE★ NYk_Reloaded718's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Queenz, NY
    Posts
    3,317
    Rep Power
    13

    Default



    Howard is a pipe dream.. i think he's got his mind set on Brooklyn.

    Nash, Melo, Stat, Howard = Potential Veto from stern

    Edit*

    After we fought for the bird rights of Lin you want to trade him for the Dwight Douche ...so he can ask to be traded by deadline because "nash wont pass him the ball enough"

    Chandler>>>>Dwight yeah i said it
    Last edited by NYk_Reloaded718; Jul 02, 2012 at 00:09.

  5. #5
    Member KnicksFan4Life's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    67
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Originally Posted by titletown2010
    Knicks could offer Lin, Chandler and a 1st rounder in 2014 for Dwight.

    Nash
    Smith/Shumpert
    Melo
    Amare
    Howard

    Wow.
    We don't have a 2014 1st.

  6. #6
    Evacuee Crazy⑧s's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    日本
    Posts
    6,488
    Rep Power
    28

    Default

    Howard can munch on a prong.

    He's embarrassing the franchise that drafted him, himself, his teammates and his family.

    The guy's your prototypical super brat. Fully convinced he deserves everything he wants when he wants it because he's the league's best rebounder.

    Gimme Tyson - WHO RAPED HIM LAST YEAR!!!!! any day of any mother****ing week.

    Never mind Lin and the pick.

    NEXT!!!!!

  7. #7
    Superstar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    538
    Rep Power
    6

    Default

    I wouldn't even trade Lin for Dwight straight up. I hate that guy and he will never win a championship because hell tear any team he is on apart before they can get there.

    Lin is the only Star that is synonymous with the Knicks since Ewing. Everyone else since then has just been a star we took from somewhere else.

    And I think we already gave our first rounder in 2014 to Denver

  8. #8
    Scoring Champ CA7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    3,869
    Rep Power
    14

    Default

    Originally Posted by Forrest17
    I wouldn't even trade Lin for Dwight straight up. I hate that guy and he will never win a championship because hell tear any team he is on apart before they can get there.

    Lin is the only Star that is synonymous with the Knicks since Ewing. Everyone else since then has just been a star we took from somewhere else.

    And I think we already gave our first rounder in 2014 to Denver
    2014 to Denver, I also think Denver can swap in 2016 but we have our 2013 pick which might be a great value pick

  9. #9
    ★Melo Mafia★ NY17KNICKS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Hudson,FL *Orig* New York
    Posts
    2,740
    Rep Power
    12

    Default

    What a down right disrespectful statement to Tyson.
    Tyson made Howard look like a bitch.

  10. #10
    Superstar nuckles2k2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    1,172
    Rep Power
    10

    Default

    Dwight Howard over Tyson?

    A grown ass man over a little boy (not some Sandusky ****, pause on that.)

    A downright vicious beast over a wishy-washy big shouldered mentally fragile puppy?

    Why?

  11. #11
    Quiet Storm New New York's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    2,431
    Rep Power
    16

    Default

    Dwight is not built for The Knicks too much pressure

    Let him go to the Brooklyn Clippers....oops I mean Nets!


    Here is the difference between Tyson Chandler and Dwight...Dwight is a beast with his combination of strength speed and agility, but it is those physical tools is why he puts up those numbers....he has virtually no basketball I.Q.

    Tyson Chandler was a difference maker for The Mavs because of his I.Q.

    Dwight's numbers will always be better, but Tyson will make more of an impact

    So, Dwight is the type of player you build around, you put the players who make smart plays around him.

    Tyson is the type of player who you add to a team with talent.

    If I was a GM and my team had the first pick in the Draft, I would select Dwight....If I was a GM trying to win a Title I would take Tyson!


    So it comes down to team need....and we need Tyson more than Dwight!

  12. #12
    Superstar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    929
    Rep Power
    5

    Default

    Ok i wasn't going to say anything on this matter, but i had to.I love TC just as much as the next knicks fan, but i'm not blinded by my love of the knicks, if Dwight is available you get him, stop with these stupid reasons why you wouldn't take Howard over TC, stop trying to convince yourselves you wouldn't do that deal in a heartbeat.We're a better team with Howard period, like i said earlier i love TC, but i'm not going to fool myself, and you guys shouldn't either.

  13. #13
    Superstar nuckles2k2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    1,172
    Rep Power
    10

    Default

    Originally Posted by fender0577
    Ok i wasn't going to say anything on this matter, but i had to.I love TC just as much as the next knicks fan, but i'm not blinded by my love of the knicks, if Dwight is available you get him, stop with these stupid reasons why you wouldn't take Howard over TC, stop trying to convince yourselves you wouldn't do that deal in a heartbeat.We're a better team with Howard period, like i said earlier i love TC, but i'm not going to fool myself, and you guys shouldn't either.
    I disagree. There's something to be said for the leadership of a TC.

    I'm not fooling myself into anything. Tyson is more mature, he's a leader of men, and he's a champion. Dwight can jump high and has big shoulders.

    Yea it's a physical upgrade over Tyson, but that's it.

  14. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    232
    Rep Power
    3

    Default

    I would definitely not trade chandler for dwight. It's called team chemistry, something we haven't had on this team in a decade. The more random changes we make, the more setbacks we'll have because we'll have to now incorporate that change in the roster. I've always said, you look at the best teams, they have a solid core of superstars. Bulls, Spurs, Celtics, Lakers etc.


    Chandler was the heart and soul of our defense this year and it would be a slap in the face both to him and the team to let him go even if it means bringing D Howard.

  15. #15
    Superstar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    929
    Rep Power
    5

    Default

    Originally Posted by nuckles2k2
    I disagree. There's something to be said for the leadership of a TC.

    I'm not fooling myself into anything. Tyson is more mature, he's a leader of men, and he's a champion. Dwight can jump high and has big shoulders.

    Yea it's a physical upgrade over Tyson, but that's it.
    Who' better player?

    Originally Posted by NYNYK
    I would definitely not trade chandler for dwight. It's called team chemistry, something we haven't had on this team in a decade. The more random changes we make, the more setbacks we'll have because we'll have to now incorporate that change in the roster. I've always said, you look at the best teams, they have a solid core of superstars. Bulls, Spurs, Celtics, Lakers etc.


    Chandler was the heart and soul of our defense this year and it would be a slap in the face both to him and the team to let him go even if it means bringing D Howard.
    Who's the better player?

Similar Threads

  1. Knicks Offseason Summer Spending (MUST READ)
    By mafra in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: May 23, 2012, 19:15
  2. Replies: 1
    Last Post: Sep 11, 2011, 04:36
  3. Bucks @ Knicks 22/02/10
    By smokes in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 121
    Last Post: Feb 23, 2010, 18:39
  4. Cavs @ Knicks 11/25 7:30 PM ET
    By jpz17 in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 65
    Last Post: Nov 26, 2008, 21:10
  5. Knicks 2007-2008 Season Recap
    By abcd in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: Feb 24, 2008, 12:12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •