Knicks could offer Lin, Chandler and a 1st rounder in 2014 for Dwight.
Howard is a pipe dream.. i think he's got his mind set on Brooklyn.
Nash, Melo, Stat, Howard = Potential Veto from stern
After we fought for the bird rights of Lin you want to trade him for the Dwight Douche ...so he can ask to be traded by deadline because "nash wont pass him the ball enough"
Chandler>>>>Dwight yeah i said it
Last edited by NYk_Reloaded718; Jul 01, 2012 at 23:09.
Howard can munch on a prong.
He's embarrassing the franchise that drafted him, himself, his teammates and his family.
The guy's your prototypical super brat. Fully convinced he deserves everything he wants when he wants it because he's the league's best rebounder.
Gimme Tyson - WHO RAPED HIM LAST YEAR!!!!! any day of any mother****ing week.
Never mind Lin and the pick.
I wouldn't even trade Lin for Dwight straight up. I hate that guy and he will never win a championship because hell tear any team he is on apart before they can get there.
Lin is the only Star that is synonymous with the Knicks since Ewing. Everyone else since then has just been a star we took from somewhere else.
And I think we already gave our first rounder in 2014 to Denver
What a down right disrespectful statement to Tyson.
Tyson made Howard look like a bitch.
Dwight Howard over Tyson?
A grown ass man over a little boy (not some Sandusky ****, pause on that.)
A downright vicious beast over a wishy-washy big shouldered mentally fragile puppy?
Dwight is not built for The Knicks too much pressure
Let him go to the Brooklyn Clippers....oops I mean Nets!
Here is the difference between Tyson Chandler and Dwight...Dwight is a beast with his combination of strength speed and agility, but it is those physical tools is why he puts up those numbers....he has virtually no basketball I.Q.
Tyson Chandler was a difference maker for The Mavs because of his I.Q.
Dwight's numbers will always be better, but Tyson will make more of an impact
So, Dwight is the type of player you build around, you put the players who make smart plays around him.
Tyson is the type of player who you add to a team with talent.
If I was a GM and my team had the first pick in the Draft, I would select Dwight....If I was a GM trying to win a Title I would take Tyson!
So it comes down to team need....and we need Tyson more than Dwight!
Ok i wasn't going to say anything on this matter, but i had to.I love TC just as much as the next knicks fan, but i'm not blinded by my love of the knicks, if Dwight is available you get him, stop with these stupid reasons why you wouldn't take Howard over TC, stop trying to convince yourselves you wouldn't do that deal in a heartbeat.We're a better team with Howard period, like i said earlier i love TC, but i'm not going to fool myself, and you guys shouldn't either.
I'm not fooling myself into anything. Tyson is more mature, he's a leader of men, and he's a champion. Dwight can jump high and has big shoulders.
Yea it's a physical upgrade over Tyson, but that's it.
I would definitely not trade chandler for dwight. It's called team chemistry, something we haven't had on this team in a decade. The more random changes we make, the more setbacks we'll have because we'll have to now incorporate that change in the roster. I've always said, you look at the best teams, they have a solid core of superstars. Bulls, Spurs, Celtics, Lakers etc.
Chandler was the heart and soul of our defense this year and it would be a slap in the face both to him and the team to let him go even if it means bringing D Howard.