View Poll Results: ???

Voters
15. You may not vote on this poll
  • 99 Knicks

    7 46.67%
  • 99 Knicks would sweep the current Knicks. Your thread is disrespectful 1 star

    3 20.00%
  • 2012 Knicks

    4 26.67%
  • 2012 Knicks would sweep those old school bums

    1 6.67%
Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: 1999 Knicks vs Current Knicks in a Best of 7, who u got?

  1. #1
    SWAGABURY KingStarbury3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Chinabury
    Posts
    3,313
    Rep Power
    21

    Default 1999 Knicks vs Current Knicks in a Best of 7, who u got?

    Charlie Ward
    Allan Houston
    Latrell Sprewell
    Larry Johnson
    Pat Ewing
    Kurt Thomas
    Marcus Camby
    Chris Childs
    Chris Dudley

    VS

    Ray Felton
    Shumpert
    Carmelo
    Amare
    Chandler
    Jason Kidd
    JR Smith
    Brewer
    Camby
    Kurt Thomas
    Novak

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    57
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Originally Posted by KingStarbury3
    Charlie Ward
    Allan Houston
    Latrell Sprewell
    Larry Johnson
    Pat Ewing
    Kurt Thomas
    Marcus Camby
    Chris Childs
    Chris Dudley

    VS

    Ray Felton
    Shumpert
    Carmelo
    Amare
    Chandler
    Jason Kidd
    JR Smith
    Brewer
    Camby
    Kurt Thomas
    Novak
    I I think 06 knick would swept them both!

  3. #3
    SWAGABURY KingStarbury3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Chinabury
    Posts
    3,313
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    I think u have a point jafet if they stayed healthier at the end of the season they woulda made the playoffs. That was the last year of Marburys prime and he played his best defense. That was also the only year Eddy Curry almost made the all star team

  4. #4
    Superstar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    799
    Rep Power
    6

    Default

    I think the current team would take in about 6. Ewing wasn't the same player at that stage of his career and I think Tyson could do a pretty good job on him. Also I don't see Houston or Spree slowing down Melo

  5. #5
    Superstar MSGhobo247's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    MSG
    Posts
    794
    Rep Power
    10

    Default

    H2O vs Shump would be an interesting battle to watch but I think the current team would end up taking it in the end.

    Good thread.

  6. #6
    Evacuee Crazy⑧s's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    日本
    Posts
    6,488
    Rep Power
    28

    Default

    The 99 team were a struggling 8th seed that peaked at the right time, and proved to the world that any pro team in basketball that worked at full potential could be deadly.

    And they were. It was almost uncanny to see a team hit 5th gear the way they did, and under the circumstances in which they did it.

    This team, much like the legends of 99, can straight rape any other when the cylinders are firing at full noise.

    It's a tough call for me, even though I remember that 99 run clearly, but I think when we see this Knick team peak, that we'll know for sure.

    If the 99 team had anything on this team, it's speed. Sprewell was a hurricane stuck in a 94x50 foot rectangle. Unstoppable. He made up for the majority of that advantage.

  7. #7
    Veteran p0nder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    1,323
    Rep Power
    10

    Default

    This years team for certain. i'd say in 6 games. As big of a Ewing fan as I am i recognize that Tyson would of been a lot of trouble for Pat at that stage. Shump/brewer would be able to slow down H20/spree. Felton is much better then childs or ward. Melo is better then anyone on that 99 knicks team and him and STAT could still score against LJ/Camby/KT. This years team has more depth and a better backcourt. the old team probably has the edge in shooting because of pat and h20. But I think that the defensive edge is actually with this years team and that would be too much for the 99 knicks.

    will this be an option in nba 2k13? would love to try it out.

  8. #8
    Veteran Sprewell-Houston's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Germany/Mount Vernon NY
    Posts
    1,357
    Rep Power
    5

    Default

    I say the 99 team would win.

    Charlie Ward is underrated, decent floor general and excellent defender.

    Spree would own the current team like Wade does on a yearly basis.

    Larry Johnson was a man, he'd prison rape Amar'e and his soft game.

    Camby and Ewing were both better overall players than Tyson Chandler is, they could score too and not only defend....even the old and injured Ewing.

    Chris Childs was at least as good as Felton, probably even better.


    I'd say in terms of defense, experience, mentality and balls the 99 team has a huge advantage.

    The current team is more athletic and provides more scoring, but guess what it's defense and attitude (toughness) that wins in the playoffs.

  9. #9
    ★KNICKS-TAPE★ NYk_Reloaded718's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Queenz, NY
    Posts
    3,317
    Rep Power
    13

    Default

    i'm going with the 99 knicks here

  10. #10
    12th man
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Far far away from the orgy that consist of clyde, 8's, rady, smokes and rono
    Posts
    11,260
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Melo would get frustrated by the 99' defense and start chucking the Knicks out of the game. Amare is too soft to play against a team like that.

    Only chance 2012 Knicks got is Chandler dominating the center position and hoping JR Smith makes 45% of his shots. Melo can't do it alone.

  11. #11
    Veteran
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    7,036
    Rep Power
    19

    Default

    The 99-Knicks were an 8th seeded (double-deep) team that made it to the FINALS .... I havnt seen the 2012-13 Knicks play .. but hell2da NO the 2012 dont come close to the 99 Knicks .. Chris Childs was a monster with Spree & Houston
    Last edited by Kiyaman; Aug 21, 2012 at 17:33.

  12. #12
    Member 21 Shump Street's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    402
    Rep Power
    6

    Default

    I picked 99 Knicks but it's close, it must be noted that the NBA was pretty weak that year comparatively. Spurs were a good team but not a standout champion, Lakers were still coming together, hell even the Heat were pretty bad for a 1 seed. The Mourning/Hardaway pairing was pretty flawed.

  13. #13
    SWAGABURY KingStarbury3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Chinabury
    Posts
    3,313
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    I agree with what alotta u sayin, Spree woulda been a problem for Melo. He knew how to position himself perfectly on defense, great footwork and great hands too. Carmelo mighta had his way in the low post against Sprewell though, but that knicks team had good help defenders and they coulda switched LJ on to Carmelo. I think their mental and physical toughness would be too much for the current knicks, even though this current team might actually have just as much talent if not more.

    And as some posters said, i cant finalize my opinion until the end of next season and I gotta see what we do in the playoffs. But I kinda think the 99 team might even son the 2012 Knicks

    I would just love to see Kurt Thomas and Camby vs Kurt Thomas and Camby. Both of them might actually have better rebounding stats now then they did then

Similar Threads

  1. Knicks 2012-2013 FULL SCHEDULE
    By NYk_Reloaded718 in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: Aug 28, 2012, 02:59
  2. ESPN's take on NY
    By Crazy⑧s in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: Oct 13, 2009, 09:44
  3. Replies: 14
    Last Post: Feb 01, 2009, 21:08
  4. At What Point Will You Say The Knicks Are Better Without Steph?
    By Eddy Currys House Special in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 130
    Last Post: Jan 21, 2008, 16:25
  5. Stop the WHINING.. PLEASE!! & READ
    By lilman_bklyn in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: Jul 01, 2007, 16:37

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •