Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 40

Thread: Do the Knicks have enough to make it out of the second round?

  1. #1
    Member gmf1369's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    364
    Rep Power
    4

    Question Mark Do the Knicks have enough to make it out of the second round?

    The Knicks' loss to Indiana in the playoffs hurt for many reasons... With Boston down, Brooklyn struggling to gel and Chicago missing 2011 MVP Derrick Rose, New York's chance to take on the Heat in the Eastern Conference Finals was last season... Thanks to their own inefficiency, key players being banged up from the long regular-season grind and a roster full of one-dimensional players, they couldn't capitalize...



    With Rose's return to Chicago, Brooklyn stacking up and Indiana's young roster likely to take another step forward, the Knicks may be on the outside looking in when it comes to the top four seeds in the Eastern Conference...

    New York will need a lot to go right this season if they hope to make it out of the second round, or even the first...



    Iman Shumpert needs to become the two-way player the Knicks desperately need... Anthony needs to play at a higher level than last season, as does Bargnani... Ron Artest needs to energize the Knicks with toughness and perimeter defense while being a model citizen... Felton and Prigioni will need to find ways to put New York's scorers in positions to succeed...



    Most of all, the Knicks need to stay healthy... Smith and Stat have knee issues, while Melo and Tyson were banged up by the end of last season... New York will have one of the NBA's oldest rosters again and if they want to make a serious run, they will need to keep everybody on the court...



    We all know that this team has potential, but what might be needed we may fall short...

    Thoughts???

  2. #2
    Member BananaSauce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    369
    Rep Power
    3

    Default

    sounds like you got insecurity issues. too many what if's... take it, one game at a time, bro.

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Smithtown
    Posts
    248
    Rep Power
    3

    Default

    Originally Posted by gmf1369
    The Knicks' loss to Indiana in the playoffs hurt for many reasons... With Boston down, Brooklyn struggling to gel and Chicago missing 2011 MVP Derrick Rose, New York's chance to take on the Heat in the Eastern Conference Finals was last season... Thanks to their own inefficiency, key players being banged up from the long regular-season grind and a roster full of one-dimensional players, they couldn't capitalize...



    With Rose's return to Chicago, Brooklyn stacking up and Indiana's young roster likely to take another step forward, the Knicks may be on the outside looking in when it comes to the top four seeds in the Eastern Conference...

    New York will need a lot to go right this season if they hope to make it out of the second round, or even the first...



    Iman Shumpert needs to become the two-way player the Knicks desperately need... Anthony needs to play at a higher level than last season, as does Bargnani... Ron Artest needs to energize the Knicks with toughness and perimeter defense while being a model citizen... Felton and Prigioni will need to find ways to put New York's scorers in positions to succeed...



    Most of all, the Knicks need to stay healthy... Smith and Stat have knee issues, while Melo and Tyson were banged up by the end of last season... New York will have one of the NBA's oldest rosters again and if they want to make a serious run, they will need to keep everybody on the court...



    We all know that this team has potential, but what might be needed we may fall short...

    Thoughts???
    There are so many conditioned "to hope for the best here" that your valid appraisel will not get any validation but mine.
    Clearly the additions of BARGNANI and Ron MWP Artest doesn't change the fact that we are a 5th seed team. The Heat, Indiana, Chicago and the new NETS are all better on paper...BUT we don't know that our roster is complete just yet. Patience grasshopper. The age of the Knicks is not the biggest issue , its KNEES. Stat and now J.R. have knee issues. The Knicks knew about J.R. prior to his signing so maybe he's insured for his contract...but how can STAT make it through an entire season when he has not been able to for the last 2-3 years. Should health not be the issue as it was last year the Knicks are now a better team as Camby , White, Novak, Richardson, Sheed, Thomas, and Kidd are replaced with MWP , Bargnani, Hardaway Jr. and starting the season with K Mart. The opportunity to add 3 more players for Veteran minimums won't greatly alter what we have currently under contract. We have added Beno, and Tyler so I remain at the roster is filled and will look this way barring a mega trade. So hopefully we make the playoffs and see where it goes from there.
    Last edited by DrB; Aug 10, 2013 at 14:03. Reason: TYLER,BENO,

  4. #4
    Veteran petescud's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,815
    Rep Power
    9

    Default

    The way things look at the moment, i don't think we'll get past the 2nd round - Pacers and Heat will definitely take us...I think the Pacers are putting together a team to beat the Heat this year...kudos to Larry Bird and their team for playing the right cards

  5. #5
    Member 21 Shump Street's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    402
    Rep Power
    6

    Default

    Yeah no way in hell we beat the Pacers, I mean Melo had a dislocated shoulder and JR had serious knee issues, Tyson was also injured, but really what does that even matter?

    We only added MWP, Bargnani and got younger, more athletic and better. Pacers added Scola and Copeland, who are both elite defenders and are real difference makers. Add that to Granger coming back who fits seamlessly with Paul George and there is no stopping them.

    Really OP? So much face palm in your post. Knicks beat Indy in 5 or 6 if fully healthy last season.

  6. #6
    Superstar nuckles2k2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    1,172
    Rep Power
    10

    Default

    Originally Posted by 21 Shump Street
    Yeah no way in hell we beat the Pacers, I mean Melo had a dislocated shoulder and JR had serious knee issues, Tyson was also injured, but really what does that even matter?

    We only added MWP, Bargnani and got younger, more athletic and better. Pacers added Scola and Copeland, who are both elite defenders and are real difference makers. Add that to Granger coming back who fits seamlessly with Paul George and there is no stopping them.

    Really OP? So much face palm in your post. Knicks beat Indy in 5 or 6 if fully healthy last season.
    But seeing as how Tyson hasn't come close to playing a full 82 game season, since he played 79 out of 82, 6 years ago...I seriously doubt he's not "injured" in the post season this year too. When you're averaging 23 missed games, per year (not counting the lockout shortened season) over the last 4 seasons...doesn't sound like he's just "injured" but he can't hold up. He's breaking down.

    If our #1 rebounding option is literally breaking down in front of our very eyes, how are we beating a team with Hibbert, West, and Scola? They came outta the womb boxing out, trying to get the rebound.

    Gotta love the eternal optimism tho. Sometimes I feel like Knicks fans would be like "nah, it's cool...everything is gonna be alright" while the bus is literally hurtling off the side of a cliff.

  7. #7
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    2,705
    Rep Power
    15

    Default

    Originally Posted by 21 Shump Street
    Yeah no way in hell we beat the Pacers, I mean Melo had a dislocated shoulder and JR had serious knee issues, Tyson was also injured, but really what does that even matter?

    We only added MWP, Bargnani and got younger, more athletic and better. Pacers added Scola and Copeland, who are both elite defenders and are real difference makers. Add that to Granger coming back who fits seamlessly with Paul George and there is no stopping them.

    Really OP? So much face palm in your post. Knicks beat Indy in 5 or 6 if fully healthy last season.
    Huh, Copeland and Scola are not elite defenders. The Pacers definitely will be better with Scola and Granger this year and the Nets will be also despite all the doubts about that aged roster. Cleveland may also be a force if Bynum can come back.

    Still don't see the reason to put Stat on minutes restriction if his knees are 100%, let him play 30 minutes and if he injures himself so be it. This Knicks were constructed to be a contending team with Stat being a FT player not a part time one, let him play.

  8. #8
    Superstar nuckles2k2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    1,172
    Rep Power
    10

    Default

    Originally Posted by tiger0330
    Huh, Copeland and Scola are not elite defenders. The Pacers definitely will be better with Scola and Granger this year and the Nets will be also despite all the doubts about that aged roster. Cleveland may also be a force if Bynum can come back.

    Still don't see the reason to put Stat on minutes restriction if his knees are 100%, let him play 30 minutes and if he injures himself so be it. This Knicks were constructed to be a contending team with Stat being a FT player not a part time one, let him play.
    #1) he was being sarcastic about Copeland and Scola.

    #2)That's the thing...his (STAT's) knees aren't good enough to let him play 30+ mins a game. When you see a company or organization say one thing, but do another, they only said what they said as a bit of spin-control, damage-control, and crowd control.

    In the summer of 2010, Amar'e went to at least 3 teams looking for a 5-year deal, and was turned down by all of them because "his knees wouldn't hold up." If I remember correctly, the Suns were offering 3-year guaranteed, with a team option on the 4th year, so if the knees went, so did Stoudemire.

    The Knicks, after being turned down by LBJ, were on the rebound...big time, and the only team even remotely interested in STAT's knees for more than 3 years guaranteed. So he took the money and security. When they went to insure his contract (like the majority of sports contracts are) it was turned down by every insurance company who they looked to get a policy from. See...insurance companies want to take your money, and not have to pay out. But with STAT, it wasn't a matter of If they had to pay out on the policy, but WHEN.

    So yea...we amnestied Billups a year early to get Tyson, who has never played all 82 games, but hasn't come close since 07-08, and we're now stuck with Amar'e.

    When the organization tells you "oh, he's healthy enough to return to all-star form....but he's only gonna play 20 mins per game" let their actions speak louder than their words.

  9. #9
    Superstar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    624
    Rep Power
    8

    Default

    Originally Posted by nuckles2k2
    #1) he was being sarcastic about Copeland and Scola.

    #2)That's the thing...his (STAT's) knees aren't good enough to let him play 30+ mins a game. When you see a company or organization say one thing, but do another, they only said what they said as a bit of spin-control, damage-control, and crowd control.

    In the summer of 2010, Amar'e went to at least 3 teams looking for a 5-year deal, and was turned down by all of them because "his knees wouldn't hold up." If I remember correctly, the Suns were offering 3-year guaranteed, with a team option on the 4th year, so if the knees went, so did Stoudemire.

    The Knicks, after being turned down by LBJ, were on the rebound...big time, and the only team even remotely interested in STAT's knees for more than 3 years guaranteed. So he took the money and security. When they went to insure his contract (like the majority of sports contracts are) it was turned down by every insurance company who they looked to get a policy from. See...insurance companies want to take your money, and not have to pay out. But with STAT, it wasn't a matter of If they had to pay out on the policy, but WHEN.

    So yea...we amnestied Billups a year early to get Tyson, who has never played all 82 games, but hasn't come close since 07-08, and we're now stuck with Amar'e.

    When the organization tells you "oh, he's healthy enough to return to all-star form....but he's only gonna play 20 mins per game" let their actions speak louder than their words.
    Stat and mwp off the bench is more lethal then cope and granger easily. Stat at 20 minutes all injury prone is waaaay better then anything cope could. Granger won't be granger cuz he's damaged goods too.

    Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk 2

  10. #10
    Superstar nuckles2k2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    1,172
    Rep Power
    10

    Default

    Originally Posted by knicksince 93
    Stat and mwp off the bench is more lethal then cope and granger easily. Stat at 20 minutes all injury prone is waaaay better then anything cope could. Granger won't be granger cuz he's damaged goods too.

    Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk 2
    I wouldn't say they're more lethal than Granger and Scola off the bench. Scola is yet another low-post efficient, rebounder, for them. Huge upgrade over Psycho-T. And Granger for 20 mins, with one iffy-knee, is more effective for his team than STAT with 2. Especially when they're core is intact, and anything Granger gives them is icing on the cake.

    STAT can't be the 4th highest cap hit in the NBA this year, but only play 20 mins per game for a team with aspirations of contention.

  11. #11
    Superstar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    624
    Rep Power
    8

    Default

    Originally Posted by nuckles2k2
    I wouldn't say they're more lethal than Granger and Scola off the bench. Scola is yet another low-post efficient, rebounder, for them. Huge upgrade over Psycho-T. And Granger for 20 mins, with one iffy-knee, is more effective for his team than STAT with 2. Especially when they're core is intact, and anything Granger gives them is icing on the cake.

    STAT can't be the 4th highest cap hit in the NBA this year, but only play 20 mins per game for a team with aspirations of contention.
    Good counter. However I still like us over them.

    Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk 2

  12. #12
    12th man
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Far far away from the orgy that consist of clyde, 8's, rady, smokes and rono
    Posts
    11,260
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Ask yourself who's our best shot blocker and best passer on the team.

    Once you name those guys, ranked them amongst the rest of the best in the NBA.

    Theres your answer.

  13. #13
    Veteran petescud's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,815
    Rep Power
    9

    Default

    Honestly, i don't think Cope gets much minutes in Indy cause of his D unless they need a scoring punch now and then. You'll get good doses of Scola, Grainger and CJ Watson though..Truly, i hope i'm wrong about them taking us...I like our guys optomism though

  14. #14
    Veteran bigapple's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    west poland
    Posts
    1,202
    Rep Power
    5

    Default

    some ppl on this board have some metnal problems or just desperations. Knicks lost game 1 which was very crucial. Same with Heat Pacers

    if Knicks would win game 1 series could b very diffrent same with Heat Pacers without game winner by your Letraveller Pacers should have 2-0 goin to Indy.


    Dont forget 1 thing

    NBA allways wants Heat Lebron in finals $tern will allway rig some games

  15. #15
    Veteran petescud's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,815
    Rep Power
    9

    Default

    Last year the NBA they did everything they could to keep us out of the finals...it worked. Hoping they don't pull the same **** this year

    Remember LBJ's 9 steps to the basket no call

Similar Threads

  1. Knicks 1st round vs
    By bigapple in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: Apr 16, 2013, 17:46
  2. Doesn't make sense for the Knicks to make playoffs.
    By metrocard in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: Jan 28, 2012, 03:31
  3. Replies: 27
    Last Post: Nov 18, 2010, 11:37
  4. Replies: 19
    Last Post: Nov 16, 2010, 14:00
  5. Round&round Q-Rich goes...
    By NYKnicks15 in forum NBA
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: Aug 22, 2009, 12:03

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •