The topic of this discussion is "What would you want the Knicks line up to look like in 2005-2006". Please be realistic when answering, because saying stuff like trading Marbury for Tracy McGrady is just way off the wall.
Assuming we're able to pull a three-way for Dalembert and Chandler (using Sweets, Jamal, Penny's expiring deal and some picks) and then trade TT's contract for Marion in Feb, this would be my happily-capped lineup:
C - Dalembert
PF - Chandler
SF - Marion
SG - QRich
PG - Marbury
IR - Allan Houston
(waive Malik Rose)
If we can't get both Dalembert and Chandler, then I would start Mo Taylor at PF because he's a monster posting up and that would give us a better insideout game.
desde la cuna del chango
Not sure how...but what the hell
REPRESENTS BROOKLYN ALL DAY EVERY DAY
BROWNSVILLE & BED-STUY
WHERE U AT?
Q Rich SG
P Pierce SF
C Frye PF
T Chandler C
C Fry C
Walker PF or Webber PF
Easter Conference Finalist Contending Team.
Donchris You heard it first......
"Walker PF or Webber PF "
hahahaha......woo that was the funniest thing i heard all day
start a scrub at pf and 2 all about me pf who are not good webber once good but hes now ass....
thank you i needed a good laugh
Thanks for your feedback but Don't sleep on C Web. As I said most of you will disagree but Webber still contributes on the scoreboard. My argument is that Weber may be the best Power foward possible available. Walker's a good guy to have for a year or so until we can trade him off. I have to defend Wally. Think about it the guys better than 3\4s of the knicks line up. He has been benched and not had the opertunity to shine.
wally will get 0 time over timmy and ariza
wallys a scrub aswell and i dont see my ppl fascinate about him. hes just like walker and webber jack up the shots and put the numbers up that way
#15...So good it had to be retired twice