Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 32

Thread: Trade Crawford of Keep Crawford?

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    192
    Rep Power
    10

    Default Trade Crawford of Keep Crawford?

    Jamal Crawford. Trader? Keeper? Jamal has that "take over the game" potential as we've seen on several occasions. He needs to improve his shot selection no doubt. Can Jamal improve his defense? Can Jamal bulk up? If he fails to improve the way NY needs him to, we can trade him. He's a young sg/pg w/ great potential. I'd rather keep Jamal, and Sweetney. I'd rather lose "Stephanie Marbury".

  2. #2
    Superstar ny3nyk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Queens, New York
    Posts
    520
    Rep Power
    10

    Default

    keep crawford, we signed him to 6 years because we saw things in him, he will definitly work out and work on his game like his passing and his point guard skills

  3. #3
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    PHOENIX
    Posts
    26
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    we must keep CRAW i im tellin u this his breakout year TRADE STARBURY.

  4. #4
    Superstar KnicksFan20's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Nj
    Posts
    554
    Rep Power
    10

    Default

    i agree keep craw deal marbury

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    86
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    MANNN how could u guys even think about trading starbury?!?! He lead our team in assists, steals, and points. I say we keep both crawford and marbury Marbury plays point, Crawford at the 2, Q playing 3, Tim thomas could play the 4, and james at the 5.. A small quick, 3 point shooting lineup. Stephanie Marbury I dono how u could call ureself a knicks fan

  6. #6
    Superstar KnicksFan20's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Nj
    Posts
    554
    Rep Power
    10

    Default

    the reason he led in assists is because of 1 person.. kurt thomas.....he had at least 6 assists a game from him alone off pick and rolls



    and ariza led in steals per 48 minutes.....he just didnt play enough....


    reason marbury scores the most cuz he was 2nd in the league in total minutes and he is a ball hog....

  7. #7
    Member crawford_fan1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    BROOKLYN
    Posts
    129
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    We should keep Crawoford he is the only SG that does good on that team. Houston haven't play 3/4 of the 2004-2005 season. Hardaway has ankle problems. So who else is going to play the SG position? I know you are think that we have Richardson now, we don't need Crawford. Bot we do need Crawford. We need a secondary SG. Houston and Hardaway is not our secondary SG. They don't even play most of the season.

  8. #8
    Veteran Peach_NYK_21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    1,240
    Rep Power
    11

    Default

    well one scenerio people having been messing around with is the idea of sliding Marbury over to the 2, and Nate and pg... personally i dont think that sounds too bad

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    east coast
    Posts
    94
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Marbury is too short to defend a lot of shooting guards. We would have the shortest backcourt in the NBA. We have to have marbury as the pg and a 6'5" shooting guard at least. A question i ask myself is who is more capable of defending 2guards: Marbury or Crawford? The answer is none of the above. Go with Q-rich at sg, TT at sf, and marbury at pg. That's the best immediate 1,2, and 3 combination until ariza proves hes better than tim thomas.

  10. #10
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    FLA
    Posts
    21
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    we MUST keep Crawford, he has the potential to be an all-star within the next couple of years, if its at the 1 or 2 idk. he will become our go-to scorer once he starts takin it to the bucket instead of settling for jumpers. he is light but not too undersized bcuz the average sg is 6'6". Larry Hughes (also 6'5" and 5 lbs lighter)[Only registered and activated users can see links. ] had to make the same transition coming into the league, lyk craw, 8th overall as a pg. I'd rather see Marbs go but i'm not saying we should.

    CRAWFORD HAS TO LEARN TO SNAG SOME BOARDS

  11. #11
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    13
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    you have to keep crawford, he would be super valuable off the bench!

  12. #12
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,590
    Rep Power
    11

    Default

    but to get what we need (a starting PF) we mite need to part with J Craw

  13. #13
    Superstar KnicksFan20's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Nj
    Posts
    554
    Rep Power
    10

    Default

    or part with marbury.......


    we can always deal some of our 7 pf's

  14. #14
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,590
    Rep Power
    11

    Default

    not everyone wants one of our 5 power forwards...Rose, Taylor, Williams, Sweetney, Lee

    the only two that are maybe desirable is Sweetney and Lee and their contracts are so cheap you would have to stick them on to a deal to make it cap wise...

  15. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    371
    Rep Power
    11

    Default

    isiah has a monstrous ego. hes not gonna trade crawford because he just got him last year. that would be like admitting that he made a mistake. he wont do that.

Similar Threads

  1. crawford a knick and its final.......
    By JJtheKnick in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: Jan 10, 2008, 15:33
  2. Crawford will play!
    By rady in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Nov 16, 2004, 11:22
  3. Crawford Wants to Win
    By jsm0331 in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: Aug 16, 2004, 17:37
  4. Crawford rejects the trade
    By jsm0331 in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: Aug 04, 2004, 17:35
  5. Knicks have trade options with Dallas
    By allan20 in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Aug 04, 2003, 12:21

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •