i think it would be a very good idea to trade Marbury straight up for Pierce cuz larryalready dislikes marbury and for the first time since SPREE we will have a nasty SF that can stroke and be a team player.
Pierce in a knick jersey
i think it would be a very good idea to trade Marbury straight up for Pierce cuz larryalready dislikes marbury and for the first time since SPREE we will have a nasty SF that can stroke and be a team player.
yea marbury says he has no problem working with brown. if he means it or not is different, but AI and chauncey were both similar to marbury before brown coached them. if anything, hes already more of a passer than they were and now has better teamates.
THANK YOU RADY. i keep saying the relationship is fine and posting articles about them saying everything has been good long ago. and even during the olympics. but everyone would rather ignore that and yell trade marbury.
now boston needs a point guard but they also dont need to get rid of Pierce. and how would gettin Pierce help us? another SF? we need a STARTING POWER FORWARD.
Pierce ? Why ?
i like him, but a good point guard is better. We already have Tim Thomas and Quentin as Small foward. If we trade Marbury I think is much better to come a power foward. A good one...
y not put tim thomas at power foward???he has the size and body.....hes strong
or if that miracle trade marion for timmy would go through marion plays pf
people want to say Marbury has a bad attitude and a ball hog and all of that stuff (which he isnt), and then you talk about PIERCE? pierce may not be much of a ball hog, but ive heard people on here queastion his attitude, plus we already have some guards for this year
from the games ive seen against pierce i havnt seen him being a ball hog
Marbury will stay with the Knicks until Isiah agrees with a trade that involves another good PG.
If Marbury is traded for Pierce, what other PG will start with Marbury's goods.
Nate can't start because he is unexperiences with the NBA
Nate from wut ive seen is basically an identical twin of marbury
we still have crawford....he played the point in chicago......u act like if we lose marbury our team is doomed
the knicks are better without him
pierce is past his prime and marbury is currently the face of the franchise. yea we all would like to see the knicks win, but have all of u forgotten what ny is about? its about heart and playing at the most famous arena in the world. marbury may not play like we want him to but i know he has heart and i guarentee that he will play better under brown
explain how pierce is passed his prime
well i guess hes not REALLY past his prime but i dont see him improving his game any further. besides, i dont think we need a 3-guard line up, we need to get big
Getting peirce would not make us big. He is a sg/sf. There is no way peirce would play pf. He never has and he never will. Trading marbury would hurt the team. Nate isn't ready to start. Marbury is a veteran point guard who will run the offense successfully. Larry Brown is going to turn marbury into a true star. The most important position is pg. We have a talented one, so why trade him? I'd like to see anyone come up with a good answer for that question. You can't because there is no other knick pg that can run the offense and pass like marbury. Nate couldn't get the number of assists in college or summerleague that stephon gets and i dont think crawford could either.
a good pg is much more valuable than a sg or sf. imo marbury is beginning to enter his prime and if he has the right pieces alongside, hell be the best pg in the nba. pierce already had his prime i think w twoine when they made the conf finals against the 6ers....also since he got stabbed hes been totally less agressive. wed be a small team w craw at the pg with bad perimeter D. not a good deal....
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote