Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: I just Don't understand one thing!!

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Hungary
    Posts
    81
    Rep Power
    0

    Default I just Don't understand one thing!!

    Why always Crawford has to be the "Last man" and finish the attacks in the Knicks in crunch time ??
    He can't be our "Buzzer beater guy", he can't even shoot the ball well!!
    He only won one time the game for the NYK with luck..
    I think every team has a best player & they have to take these final shoots at the end of the games.
    Our best is Starbury, why can't he just take these shoots like Kobe, T-mac, A.I., etc does?? Huh?

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    371
    Rep Power
    11

    Default

    yeah man, i agree. we should TRADE crawford.

    we should trade him for.........

    earl watson!!!

    watson is a better backup point guard, doesnt hog the ball, plays better D, etc...

    JAMAL CRAWFORD FOR EARL WATSON STRAIGHT UP!!!!!!!!

    if isiah doesnt do that trade hes an idiot!!!!

    we desperately need a backup point guard, doesnt isiah know how to fill missing holes in the roster????

  3. #3

    Default

    **** that, Watson sucks more....... trade crawford for wilcox or sumthing.

  4. #4
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,590
    Rep Power
    11

    Default

    he was being sarcastic...and once again Earl Watson is a better point guard NOT a better player so no way should that trade even be really considered...

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Hungary
    Posts
    81
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    I wasn't talkin' about trading Crawford for Watson, just tellin' that MARBURY has to take the final shots and no one else in the team!!

  6. #6
    Knicks Guru hometheaterguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    1,017
    Rep Power
    12

    Default

    I happen to like Crawford, he is a talented guy but he is small at the 2. I would love to see him play the 1. I whish he would get it into his head that he could be a tremendous point guard and then he would be a decent size at the 1 spot. He came into the league with Chicago playing him at the one. I feel it is his small stature that causes him to struggle from time to time. He has good court vision and passing skills, he just does no want to play the 1. So, that being said, since we have QR whose game is a carbon copy of Crawford’s; he could be expendable. Don’t think many teams would want him though. Remember, we tried to trade him for Kwame and they wanted QR instead. If we keep Marbury, we should try to move either Crawford or QR.

  7. #7
    Your Best Bet is B Ez datruth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    new york
    Posts
    1,553
    Rep Power
    12

    Default

    finally ya seein wat i saw three years ago....we have to get chris wilcox but i wont trade crawford for him cuz wilcox wont come expensive...trade malik rose or jerome james or maybe even a draft pick and cash

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    113
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    the knicks need to keep jamal crawford earl watson won't give us any offense and marbury and crawford are playing good defense the knicks are fine the way they are the guys need to get used to each other if the knicks keep on making trades the players won't never be able to get used to each other and we will be sort of like the hawks who make trades every month

Similar Threads

  1. Today In NBA
    By NYKnicks15 in forum NBA
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: Apr 22, 2005, 12:43
  2. Jay Williams
    By Skyhi300 in forum NBA
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: Jan 17, 2005, 14:14
  3. [Article] Isiah Has A Suhr Thing
    By rady in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: May 30, 2004, 10:40
  4. Replies: 3
    Last Post: Jan 18, 2004, 06:29

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •