Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 21 of 21

Thread: What would your lineup be?

  1. #16
    El Cacique portega1968's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    River Rocks, Port Rich (Rio Piedras, Puerto Rico PUNETA!!!)
    Posts
    1,611
    Rep Power
    12

    Default

    And the assist goes to mapquest.com... jajaja

    We may not agree on Steph's fate and part in this mess, but at least we agree on using Stevie to land a PF.

    Props 2 ya' bro'... peace!!!

  2. #17
    Next season, keep waiting donchris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Raleigh NC
    Posts
    1,689
    Rep Power
    12

    Default

    What's up with all this apologetic stuff. You guys getting all diplomatic and what not. Man nearly a year ago I was fighting wars in this forum. But seriously it's good to see mutual respect. Moving on. I'm not for moving Marbury here's why.
    When Marbury scores more than he passes, which is a must being that no one else on this squad can score. When he does this Brown and others say "He's not being a floor general. Implying that he needs to pass first. When he passes first and they lose Brown and others say "He's not being aggressive enough." So it's a double edged sword. Marbury's not the problem. The problem is our best PF is a rookie and best SG is a PG.

  3. #18
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    2,085
    Rep Power
    13

    Default

    My starting five for next year would be:

    pg- Nate Robinson
    sg- Jamal Crawford
    sf- Q-rich
    pf- Channing Frye
    center- Eddie Curry

    Marbury needs to go asap and as much as I like Stevie Franchise' talent, he doesn't seem coachable. We have to start playing the young guys consistenly, and this lineup leaves plenty of flexibilty off the bench to go big or small as the needs arise.

  4. #19
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    NY 'til I Die
    Posts
    321
    Rep Power
    9

    Default

    Originally Posted by jimkcchief88
    My starting five for next year would be:

    pg- Nate Robinson
    sg- Jamal Crawford
    sf- Q-rich
    pf- Channing Frye
    center- Eddie Curry

    Marbury needs to go asap and as much as I like Stevie Franchise' talent, he doesn't seem coachable. We have to start playing the young guys consistenly, and this lineup leaves plenty of flexibilty off the bench to go big or small as the needs arise.
    thats a good lineup, it could bring us from the 2nd worst team in the league right into dead last.

  5. #20
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    NY 'til I Die
    Posts
    321
    Rep Power
    9

    Default

    Originally Posted by donchris
    I'm not for moving Marbury here's why.
    When Marbury scores more than he passes, which is a must being that no one else on this squad can score. When he does this Brown and others say "He's not being a floor general. Implying that he needs to pass first. When he passes first and they lose Brown and others say "He's not being aggressive enough." So it's a double edged sword. Marbury's not the problem. The problem is our best PF is a rookie and best SG is a PG.
    i agree 110%

  6. #21
    NYKnicks
    Guest

    Default

    - STARBURY
    - JAMAL CRAWFORD
    - Q / LEE
    - CANNING FRYE
    - EDDY CURRY

Similar Threads

  1. The Starting Lineup Has NOT Been Named
    By littleed511 in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: Oct 13, 2006, 19:00
  2. Knicks lineup ideas
    By nyk35 in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: Sep 20, 2005, 01:56
  3. The Knicks Starting Lineup
    By Knicks_fan_4_eva92 in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: Aug 11, 2005, 19:47
  4. This can't be our lineup!!!!!
    By nycefnl in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: Jul 27, 2005, 10:50
  5. knicks need new lineup
    By nycballa91 in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Jun 02, 2004, 16:12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •