Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: [NY Post] Lee Miffed About Return To Bench

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Administrator rady's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Romania
    Posts
    3,811
    Rep Power
    10

    Media [NY Post] Lee Miffed About Return To Bench

    David Lee appeared displeased by Isiah Thomas' statement that he will be heading to the bench shortly, when Jared Jeffries and Channing Frye make their returns.

    Lee, the team's most popular and scrappiest player, had always followed the company line, so his remarks were very significant.

    "I'm surprised he's already made the decision," said Lee, who's started at power forward since Frye sprained his ankle 10 days ago.


    [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

  2. #2
    Veteran Starks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Bronx
    Posts
    1,472
    Rep Power
    11

    Default

    Okay. so we bench are most popular and hardest working player.. Yea, thats a great message. Things are going to get extremely ugly..and I mean fast

  3. #3
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1,642
    Rep Power
    11

    Default

    i sorta agree.. i think that jefferies and frye should get a starting job by earning it back when they are healthy.

    normally a player does not lose his job because of an injury, but these are not normal times here in knick-land.

    the team is dying for players who show up every night, and so far this year that's q-rich and lee... and recently i guess curry..

    some guys will have a bruised ego being the 6th or 7th man... tough ****...

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    QUEENS
    Posts
    101
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    I totally agree, David Lee and Balkman hustle their asses off which is more then i can say for anyone else on the team, besides maybe Q rich. Frye should not get his job back and jeffries never had it. Yea he was IT's "big" offseason signing but he has never played with the other guys and im sure he will be rusty. If i was Lee i would be pissed too, the guy averages almost a double double and your gonna bench him. thats bull****.

  5. #5
    Member theknicks3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    260
    Rep Power
    8

    Default

    i love lee as a player, he is hardworking and someone I would want in the starting line up.

    Alot would disagree with me, but I think we could package QRich and Marbury or Francis for two capable players. I think this is something we should look at. I cant see this same roster winning the playoffs unless something like this is done. The only trade bait we have...

    QRich - keep playing him, trade him for someone we can see has chemistry with other players.

    Frye - injured value gone down.

    Lee - We should sleep on Lee, I like him and see him in the future lineup at PF with Curry.

    Who agrees./disagrees with this

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Posts
    455
    Rep Power
    10

    Default

    David Lee should shut up and go back to the bench. When you come off the bench (secondary player) you know that when an injured starter is returning he won't lose his position to injury. Lee has been effective, but his bitching does nothing for team chemistry, which at times seems very tenuous at best. If this was Stephon Marbury unfortunately everyone would be on him for being a bad teammate. Lee knew this was temp job, so really he has no reason to act out this way.

  7. #7
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1,642
    Rep Power
    11

    Default

    Originally Posted by theknicks3
    Alot would disagree with me, but I think we could package QRich and Marbury or Francis for two capable players. I think this is something we should look at. I cant see this same roster winning the playoffs unless something like this is done. The only trade bait we have...
    i partly agree with ya.. q-rich is probably our best trading chip/bait. on the other hand, he and lee are the only guys who seem to play hard every night, so trading him probably hurts us in the short run, but depending on who is aquired for him, it could help us in the long run... decisions/decisions...

    as to packaging 'Q' with one of our point guards, i don't think there is a market for either... both have a lot of baggage tagging along with them... namely $ 40m (give of take a couple of $$$) owed over the next two years..

    if u are a contender and aquiring 'starbury' or franchise puts u over the top, then maybe u look at them, but does anyone really think that a contender is going to look at either of those guys and think they are the answer?? i don't .

    if u are not a contender, what the hell will either guy give u for $40m??.. they ain't making u an upper tier team, so u mite as well go with guys making a lot less..

    if I.Thomas can move either of them, in my mind he is G.M. of the year.
    Last edited by rady; Dec 08, 2006 at 08:58.

  8. #8
    Your Best Bet is B Ez datruth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    new york
    Posts
    1,553
    Rep Power
    12

    Default

    Originally Posted by 20 is a CROOK
    I totally agree, David Lee and Balkman hustle their asses off which is more then i can say for anyone else on the team, besides maybe Q rich. Frye should not get his job back and jeffries never had it. Yea he was IT's "big" offseason signing but he has never played with the other guys and im sure he will be rusty. If i was Lee i would be pissed too, the guy averages almost a double double and your gonna bench him. thats bull****.
    well jefferies wasnt going big on the offense, so i dont think rust will be a problem to a defender, i guess the speed of the game but he 4 yyear plus in the league so it shoulndt be a problem, and anyway david lee is still gonna get big minutes, just that energy he brings off the bench is needed and david lee is better off playing other teams 2nd unit

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    NY 'til I Die
    Posts
    321
    Rep Power
    9

    Default

    Thomas was kinda messed up singling out Lee like that. especially when hes playing better then pretty much everyone on the team. what has Frye done so good that makes him a lock as a starter? nothing that ive seen. and the more time is going by the more he is reminding me of Kenyon Martin. not the style of play but the inconsistency and how he has been injury prone.

    Lee- 10.7PPG 8.9RPG
    Frye- 7.6PPG 5.5 RPG

    channing needs to prove he can play @ the level he did the begining of last season on a steady basis. the truth is he hasn't yet. and carpy take it ez. if anything lee bit his toungue when questioned by the media. he was very professional about it.

    our starters get us in a hole early mainly because of rebounding. frye next to curry allows the opposition to rip down boards on both ends of the court @ ease. lee allows curry to worry more about his offense and getting up and down the court then chasing rebounds. i dont care whatchu say ... David Lee is a better man for the job.

Similar Threads

  1. Jeffries expected to return in 2 weeks
    By rady in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: Nov 22, 2006, 12:16
  2. Jay Williams plans to return
    By rady in forum NBA
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: Aug 07, 2006, 22:15
  3. Where's the bench?
    By donchris in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: Aug 12, 2005, 19:43
  4. [Article] Bedlam on Knick bench
    By newmove in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: Nov 13, 2004, 03:46
  5. Pistons say bench new, improved
    By newmove in forum NBA
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: Oct 28, 2004, 19:28

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •