How did this come up? Again...keep on subject. All those players are MVP caliber players that can take over a game. 3/6 of the guys have rings. 4/6 have been to the championship. The only player that could possibly be on Nash's level is KG and T-Mac yet they take over games and Nash does not.
I call him kid, he calls me kid back. I call him my son, child, he does the same. I think he gave up on spitting bullshit and his opinion and he focusing on my style. You can't bite the swagger kid. w :afro:
What the hell are you talking about in your first paragraph? Stats in the playoffs don't mean everything. If they did, then you could make an agruement for Jerome James earning his contract from his OKAY preformance for Seattle in the playoffs.
You did bring it up chimp, you ranked Nash ahead of T'Mac. You even use playoff preformances to bring down Nash's value. Nash is a better playoff preformance and has had more sucess in the playoffs than T'Mac's whole 10 year career, bottom line.
No one is off topic, you ranked players ahead of Nash and your reason for that was "Nash doesn't dominate like a MVP" "He doesn't dominate in the playoffs".
You repeat yourself over, and over and over. "Nash doesn't dominate"
You're holding on to your agruement by your pinky finger now.
You just said KG is on Nash level. KG is a former MVP and a top 5 NBA player. Basically you mean Nash is a MVP caliber player and a top 5 player if he's on KG level. Good job on contradicting yourself, again.
You should of said "Being a leader", instead of dominating before you wrote that garbage. You're always changing up your words. Just say what you mean.
How can anyone agrue that Nash isn't a leader? Sure his team has not advanced to the finals yet, but they sure as hell had great opportunities to. It is not like Nash totally flunked in the playoffs like T'Mac or other overrated superstars. Nash has preformed at the elite level in the playoffs, and gave his team a chance to win those teams, everygame. Thats what MVP's do.
Nash had led his team to the 2005 and 2006 conference finals and fell short to elite teams. Nash was Nash, but he faced better TEAMS. Thats something you need to understand. Just because Nash's team lost to the best team or top 2 doesn't mean he isn't a leader, or dominant. He's consistant with his team and gave the Suns an opportunity most teams in the NBA don't have, back to back conference finals apperances. It is not the biggest accomplish, but Nash has done alot for Phoneix in the playoffs in only a span of 3 years. He will do the same thing next year, cause he is a leader.
Once again you prove you have poor poor knowledge of the Knicks. Houston was dropping buckets on George, Kobe, no one could stop him. It was a dominating preformance. Houston proved he can dominate and take over game. He has DONE it. So has Nash. You were proven wrong, just walk it off.
Taking credit away from the greatest Knick shooter of all time to make your nonlogical irrevelant point about Nash not "dominating" games? Sick, you are the most disgusting person to ever claim to be a Knick fan, hence the reason why you never earned the title as Knick fan from me, son.
Stockon didn't win MVP because he didn't win the NBA Finals? Now you're gonna discredit John fucking Stockon?
Stockon didn't win MVP because Barkley, Jordan, Hakeem, Robinson and Malone were in the NBA, not because he didn't win the NBA finals.
Barkley and Malone didn't win the finals, but they were still MVP's. I don't understand your stupidity. Your posting is similar to Steve Franchis' headless chicken dribbling-turnover routine, it goes no where. The fact you have to bold your words make you seem weaker in material and facts. Do your research first, stop sweating my style and trying to style your senseless post, it hasn't work.
I'v thrown stats, his resume in the playoffs and his ability to create and dominant the pace of the game. You thrown monkey shit at me, and I'm offended. Don't ever lower my IQ like that again. When I read post, I expect quality shit. Look at around the forum. There are alot of quality post and you are the least of them. Thats why when I reply to you, you get little to zero respect, cause you havent' earned it and you retaliate in anger and frustration. The difference between me and you as posters, is that theres always something in my post you can agree with, always. No matter how opinionated I am or I try to be(I try), I'm just good at laying down the facts and proving my points. I can't honestly remember I've agreed with you once. If there was, please show me. The reason for that is you always have a tense pissed off losing attitude in your post. Just be open minded and stop trying to discredit everything. As my boy Spirit of Truth would say "You simple monkey minded mothafucka"
Nash is MVP
Nash is a deserving MVP
Nash is a competitor, a leader and a dominant all star player.
Nash has been the most sucessful PG in the NBA in the last 3 years, thus making him the best at his position currently.
Theres a MVP for the regular season and a MVP for the playoffs. Sad you just figured this out today.
Nash has GONE far in the playoffs multiple times.
Like what we use to say in HS in the Bronx...."Cut ya mic off" :smokin: Peaaaace