Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 46 to 53 of 53

Thread: King of Turnovers

  1. #46
    Veteran
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    7,033
    Rep Power
    19

    Default

    Did the Knicks get something done about both ends of the Peremeter this offseason? YES!
    In June they aquired Zach (offense), Fred Jones (defense), Rookie Chandler & Nicholes (they play both well offense & defense).

    Did Isiah do something to help Curry this Offseason? Yes!
    aquiring 6.11 Randolph Morris, and 6.9 Zach Randolph. The growth of young players Lee & Balkman improvement will give Curry a better lift this season.

    What has been done about the Knicks backcourt this Offseason? nothing.
    Still have Zeke Favorite PET Players "Marbury & Crawford" getting all the playingtime.

    Preseason coaching should do something about lowering the 18 turnovers a game, and oponents 87 FGA per game.

  2. #47
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    BROOKLYN RAISED IN QUEENS
    Posts
    177
    Rep Power
    8

    Nyk Logo What Nothing was done

    I guess Crawford gaining 15 pounds of muscle to his mid section was nothing i guess Isiah and his team of coaches didnt come up with that idea. Fred jones is a pg nichols and chandler are shooting guars he picked up j jordan who is a pg but he did nothing. Are you slow or something i ususally dont say this about people but something is def wrong with you. Oh yeah Marbury had no turnovers and 5 assits against tel aviv. So that means his average is 1 TO a game not too bad bro not too bad at all


  3. #48
    Newbie TJ.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    35
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Jones is not a point guard. He can play either shooting guard or small forward.

  4. #49
    Member brooklyn_baller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Brooklyn
    Posts
    321
    Rep Power
    9

    Default

    Well the Knicks do led te NBA in turnovers. But the main focus is on the team, not one person(s) that cause tunovers. If there is somene to blame on the cause of the turnovers, that person should be the head coach/general manager, Isiah Thomas. If he was any real coach, he would take the time to help each player that cause turnovers. But we all know that Isiah has bette things to do, like trade off players for even more guards on the team and of course getting his big fat check from Jim Dolan.

  5. #50
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    BROOKLYN RAISED IN QUEENS
    Posts
    177
    Rep Power
    8

    Default wow

    So all the individuals who had problems last year who changed up to make there situation better this year was not because of Isiah. Ok once again 15 pounds of muscle so crawford can fight through screens and finish inside easier i see so many in ones this year from him oh boy. Curry loosing 20 pounds. Also last game Marbury didnt have a single turnover not one at all wow but still he dosnt get any love for that right You guys suck go root for another team please.


  6. #51
    12th man
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Far far away from the orgy that consist of clyde, 8's, rady, smokes and rono
    Posts
    11,260
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Originally Posted by MSGKnickz33
    I was really impressed with Marbury last season. I remember him doin a great job defensively on Gilbert Arenas and Ray allen. He really stepped up his D last year. Clyde would describe his defense as clinging to his opponent like a cheap suit. Hopefully with Crawford being stronger he can also step up his defense this year. He seems to be a good away from the ball defender but not a good 1 on 1 defender because of his lack of strength and probably defensive fundamentals to. Hes got the strength now, hes just gotta work on the footwork.
    Good analysis, we always seem something new each season, whether its positive or negative.

  7. #52
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    BROOKLYN RAISED IN QUEENS
    Posts
    177
    Rep Power
    8

    Thumbs down Curry Had No Turnovers

    BUT WE LOST BY 40 POINTS 101 TO 61 THIS IS SAD I DONT KNOW WHAT TO THINK ABOUT THIS SITUATION. THEY HELD GARNET AND THE OTHER BIG MEN DOWN BUT THE GUARDS RAN THROUGH US AND THERE TEAM SHUT DOWN OUT TEAM BAD. I DONT KNOW WHAT TO THINK ABOU THIS ZACH WENT NUT MARBURY WENT NUT AND NO ONE SCORED IN DOUBLE FIGURES FROM OUT TEAM. SOMEONE PLEASE BE OPTIMISTIC GIVE ME SOME KIND OF REASON TO BELIEVE THIS WONT HAPPEN AGAIN


  8. #53
    Superstar The 1 and Only's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    995
    Rep Power
    9

    Default

    We just had our heads handed to us. But this isn't necessarily a bad thing. First off...we didn't play our best players half of the time. If this were a real game...we would have been in the game the entire game and it wouldn't have been a blow out. Then you have to ask yourself, do you think KG can guard Z-Bo or Curry without getting in foul trouble. I guess that could go the other way also but we put our youngsters in the game early by looking at the play by play. The celtics played their projected rotation for most of the game while playing others sparingly. We played our entire roster basically lol. Thus not giving our star players rhythm or cohesion time on the court. Basketball is more than just stat sheets. So we have to look at all the factors other than just the numbers. I say we'll be alright...the next time they come around...we'll be ready for them.

Similar Threads

  1. Less turnovers = better Knicks chemistry
    By metrocard in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: Mar 11, 2007, 13:49
  2. Turnovers and Fouls are gonna KILL us!!!
    By BallHead in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: Nov 03, 2006, 18:00
  3. KG to be a KING?
    By NYKnicks15 in forum NBA
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: Jun 15, 2006, 08:09

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •