Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 38 of 38

Thread: New York Knicks vs New Jersey Nets Game Thread

  1. #31
    Veteran StEpHoN_mArBuRy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Queenz
    Posts
    3,086
    Rep Power
    15

    Default

    Originally Posted by Toons
    knicks win....so what if the nets are kiddless, we donth have cuurry or randolph....maybe theis should b our starting lineup lol
    You sounded a bit sarcastic there but I think Isiah should seriously consider this. The defensive intensity was great last night and the offesnse was flowing fluently. Had Curry palyed we would've kept force feeding the post which leads to everyone standing around and offensive stagnation. Godd win tonight.


    6-11 with a back to back against the 76ers comming up...

    8-11 anyone ?

  2. #32
    Veteran
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    6,978
    Rep Power
    18

    Default

    Well, the two so-call Knick Franchise players "Marbury & Curry" did not play against the Nets, and the Knicks finally WON a road game.
    This Knicks first Road WIN had nothing to do with the Missing of Marbury & Curry, it was because the Nets Coach, Floor Leader, Franchise Player, and best PG in the NBA was missing in action "Jason Kidd".
    Plus the Nets played reckless ball all 48 minutes of the game.

    Knick-Fans dont get happy over Jamal Crawford Performance in the Nets game. Crawford is still not as good as the average Guard in the NBA, this was one of those games that Crawford gives us every 20 games of the season when the next team have no leadership in the Backcourt.
    It would have been a different story and a Knick Loss if either PG-Kidd or PG-Armstrong had played for the Nets.
    When was the last time either of us seen Crawford take 14 shots from the Foul line in one game? 2, 3, or 4 seasons ago.
    Crawford shot 7-17 from the FG, 3-8 on 3-pointers, and a season high 7 assists, and only 2 fouls in 45 minutes of playingtime. Which means if the Nets SG-Carter had another Guard beside him with the Green Light to score they would have tourched Crawford.


    What was Q.Richardson doing for 40 minutes of the game? Nothing! SF-Richard Jefferson 31 points, SF-Mark Allen 13 points, and SF-Nachbar 16 points. We need Q.Richardson off this team, and far away from Knick Players.

    Fred Jones took advantage of being a Starter and defended the passing lane so well that he put the "W" in this Knick Road WIN.

    What's up with Isiah Thomas in just giving Nate Robinson only 6 minutes to score 7 points in this Nets game with a Nets team who had a PG (Gill) that Nate could have gotten 30 points in just 25 minutes. Crawford, Jones, and Q.Richardson did not have to play 40 or more minutes in this Nets game for the Knicks to WIN.

    This game showed that Isiah Thomas should not be the Head Coach of this Knick Team, giving the bench-players only 31 minutes for 11 points, when all the offensive plays throughout the game were designed for just Zach & Crawford "One on One" talent (Nate Robinson made another mistake by scoring again, so his benching will continue.).

    This has been the main reason Isiah Thomas coaching of 15 Knick players has been very POOR at getting team chemistry from the Knick roster, when a scouting report on the Nets had to show they were at the end of a Back to Back game where they struggled for the WIN over a Lebronless Cavs team lastnight with the BIG Help of Jason Kidd whom did not showup for this Knick game.

    Isiah Thomas gave 3 halfcourt players on the Knicks 40 and more minutes against a Nets team that played an uptempo fast pace game the previous night inwhich aghausted their Franchise PG-Leader to the point where he could not even show up tonight and play vs Knicks.
    Isiah Thomas coaching rotation was helping the Nets stay in the game for the final minutes of the fourth quarter.
    Knick-Fans should know that if the Nets PG-Kidd or PG-Armstrong would have played for the Nets, that Isiah coaching & Rotation would have cost the Knicks this game in the 4th quarter by depending on 40 minutes of halfcourt offense from Zach, Q.Rich, and Crawford.
    Lord knows we need a brighter Head Coach in New York...

  3. #33
    Veteran LJ4ptplay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Ft. Collins, CO
    Posts
    2,950
    Rep Power
    12

    Default

    Even though the Nets were without Kidd, you still have to recognize the effort the Knicks played with. Two big scorers (Crawford, Randolph) surrounded by hustle players is a more balanced starting lineup. My personal opinion is when you have more than three starters on the floor who need the ball to be effective, the play becomes stagnant with less ball movement and more individual play. I hope Eddy and Steph are out for many more games. If a winning streak begins (haha, who am I kidding?!?) with this more balanced lineup, Isiah will have to shake some things up. Yeah right. We all know Isiah will go back to the old, stagnant, no ball-movement lineup when everybody comes back.

  4. #34
    Your Best Bet is B Ez datruth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    new york
    Posts
    1,553
    Rep Power
    12

    Default

    Originally Posted by Kiyaman

    What's up with Isiah Thomas in just giving Nate Robinson only 6 minutes to score 7 points in this Nets game with a Nets team who had a PG (Gill) that Nate could have gotten 30 points in just 25 minutes. Crawford, Jones, and Q.Richardson did not have to play 40 or more minutes in this Nets game for the Knicks to WIN.

    This game showed that Isiah Thomas should not be the Head Coach of this Knick Team, giving the bench-players only 31 minutes for 11 points, when all the offensive plays throughout the game were designed for just Zach & Crawford "One on One" talent (Nate Robinson made another mistake by scoring again, so his benching will continue.).
    man do u really watch the game, yeah nate scored some baskets but on defense it was killing us, nate came in da game when eddie gill was in da game but when eddie gill got in foul trouble that forced the knicks to play that 2-3 zone which lead to the nets cutting the 14 point lead to 7 after the back to back nachbars 3 pointers, it was just the match ups dat limited nate in DIS GAME.....

  5. #35
    Go 1990s New York Knicks! nyKnicks126's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1,842
    Rep Power
    9

    Default

    Originally Posted by LJ4ptplay
    I hope Eddy and Steph are out for many more games. If a winning streak begins (haha, who am I kidding?!?) with this more balanced lineup, Isiah will have to shake some things up. Yeah right. We all know Isiah will go back to the old, stagnant, no ball-movement lineup when everybody comes back.
    Yupp. But its unfortunate cause Isiah doesn't see that... He is a bad GM. The reason why there is no ball movement is because of the two problem players we have EC and Stephon Marbury. Marbury passes it to EC. Curry either shoots it, turns it over, passes it out, and the same things are done over again... then the knicks SLOWLY swing the ball around the perimeter..... no effort.


    I remember the late mid 90s , when the ball was quickly and accurately passed among the knick players to find an open man.... But now wit Marbury its a slow paced offense.

    Its a coaching error, and since Marbury can't make plays for others thats why we are in the situation we are in right now. I say trade MARBS and EC to Philly like said in your thread.

  6. #36
    Cutest Guy Here Kennedy Curse's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Queens New York Ozone park
    Posts
    913
    Rep Power
    7

    Default

    well we beat liek a a bad nets team...they only had 8 players! and eddie gill kept gettin in foul trouble

  7. #37
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Bronx
    Posts
    75
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Steph Buries His Dad

    http://www.nydailynews.com/img/2007/...y_funeral9.jpg. this is very sad. my thoughts and prayers are with Steph and his family

  8. #38
    Veteran
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    6,978
    Rep Power
    18

    Nyk Logo

    Originally Posted by dr.carpy
    Your bias makes your posts stray into being obsurd. Seriously, Q-Rich has done everything rebounding assisted the ball, played killer D, so your best thought is to trade him? He has been one of the most consistant members of this squad. Once Q-Rich gets into a rhythm, he will be one of the biggest threats on this team. He's bought into the system. You can tell by how hard he plays night in, night out.
    What game have you been watching, or what Richardson player in the NBA are you talking about? It can't be the Q.Richardson that is in his third season with the Knicks and only played decent B-Ball for only two months (2006 November & December) since becomming a Knick. The so call Q.Rich "Back-Injury" has played out its the same as the Nets Head Coach Jason Kidd "Migrane" which is a different story which will make head lines because the majority of his teammates stand behind him on everything (maybe that's why the Knicks was finally able to beat the Nets).

    Marbury is a selfish uncoachable player, Crawford is a Soft One on One Street Ballin Nut, Curry is softer than Butter, Zach is LAZY,
    But Q.Richardson is a NBA BUM that has no trade value in the NBA (Penny Hardaway, Trevor Ariza, and rookie David Lee played 100% better than Q.Richardson's first season as a Knick. Coach Larry Brown Firing and 23 WIN season had alot to do with him Starting Bum Q.Richardson and playing him for 30 MPG.
    Q.Richardson & Davis did not want to be a Knick and showed it consistently in their performance their first season as a Knick.
    Q.Richardson performance was so BAD the Knicks was forced to make the trade for "Jalen Rose".

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 12
    Last Post: Apr 15, 2007, 10:21
  2. Replies: 8
    Last Post: Feb 26, 2007, 10:31
  3. Replies: 31
    Last Post: Jan 20, 2007, 10:05
  4. Replies: 16
    Last Post: Feb 25, 2006, 21:22
  5. GAME THREAD - 2/8/06 - 7:30 pm EST - Knicks @ Nets
    By Peach_NYK_21 in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: Feb 09, 2006, 02:08

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •