Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 35 of 35

Thread: where's marbury?

  1. #31
    Your Best Bet is B Ez datruth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    new york
    Posts
    1,553
    Rep Power
    11

    Default

    Originally Posted by MSGKnickz33
    Its not fair to go by marburys stats so far, family deaths plus Isiah.
    Just one last stat for you, 3pt shooting %'s:

    marbury = 42%
    Crawford = 32%

    In conclusion, Crawford is more turnover prone then Marbury when he doesnt have the ball in his hands as much. This also shows how selfish Zach Randolph is to be averaging 3.15 turnovers per game. But back to Crawford, he is just another player, theres nothing important about him. Theres a long list of shooting guards better then him (see above). Unlike lunch for Eddy Curry, Zach Randolph, and Jerome James, this discussion is over.
    homie u contradicting urself, just stop it

    Originally Posted by metrocard
    Theres actually a reason.




    Marbury is a PG...guys like Nash, Kidd average 3-4 turnovers, same with Davis, its common.


    Crawford is a SG, a SHOOTING GUARD and shoots poorly, is turnover prone and weak defensively.

    .
    i understand what u saying wit marbury is a PG and stuff like dat but doesnt jamal have the ball more than stephon, correct me if im wrong, doesnt jamal play the PG through out the game?? i dont know, maybe im bugging

  2. #32
    The Gold Mac MSGKnickz33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    4,474
    Rep Power
    12

    Default

    Originally Posted by datruth
    homie u contradicting urself, just stop it
    Is that the best thing you can come up? This is somthin thats debateable, theres 2 sides to it:

    1) I am contradicting myself
    2) Although Marbury has had a tough start becuz of personal reasons, it is pathetic that hes still shooting better then Crawford.

    You took one of the first things I said then one of the last. One of them was referring striclty to turnovers and that arguement favored crawford becuase marbury is averaging less turnovers this year then he did last year. Hes also playin less minutes, so I chose to go with last years stats.

    That 42% from downtown is very imressive with everything starburys been through, what happened to crawford that has made him shoot a low 32% 3pt fg percentage?

    As you see, theres many different ways to look at it but most of them favor what im tryin to say.

  3. #33
    12th man
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Far far away from the orgy that consist of clyde, 8's, rady, smokes and rono
    Posts
    11,260
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    classic Starbury battle.

  4. #34
    The Gold Mac MSGKnickz33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    4,474
    Rep Power
    12

    Default

    Originally Posted by GetRealistic
    Not to mention Jones and Crawfod have been a solid combo.







  5. #35
    12th man
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Far far away from the orgy that consist of clyde, 8's, rady, smokes and rono
    Posts
    11,260
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Originally Posted by MSGKnickz33









    I remember when I thought GetRealstic was retarded, he has improved his game though.

    LOL, looking at old threads is always a good laugh.

Similar Threads

  1. Marbury must go!
    By nycefnl in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: Dec 09, 2007, 10:10
  2. Starbury...what a joke!
    By JerseyCityNETSfan15 in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: Mar 20, 2006, 08:41
  3. If the Knicks want Brown, get rid of Marbury
    By Cakalusa in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: Jul 29, 2005, 21:04
  4. good words from marbury
    By risingknicks20 in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: Jul 23, 2005, 20:05
  5. Knick Concerns
    By mrj18 in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: Jan 04, 2005, 14:51

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •