Page 8 of 17 FirstFirst ... 234567891011121314 ... LastLast
Results 106 to 120 of 241

Thread: The Official Crawford Sucks Thread

  1. #106
    Superstar pat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    902
    Rep Power
    10

    Default

    Okay, here are three things everybody should be able to agree on:
    1.) Allan Houston was a great shooter
    2.) Sprewell could go to the basket whenever he wanted
    3.) LJ was the lockerroom leader. ([Only registered and activated users can see links. ])

    I know, we are running out of topics but this fight is absolutely useless. Crawford is still out there, Houston didn't manage to make a comeback and LJ ...
    ... I don't even know where he is.

  2. #107
    12th man
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Far far away from the orgy that consist of clyde, 8's, rady, smokes and rono
    Posts
    11,260
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Another L for fatboy, goes complete off topic when he gets tired of holding his delusional statements in his little fat hand.

    Why would anyone say they play for a D-1 school online but not even name it? You're not even good at lying.

    You're 28 years old and 15 year olds on this site stay tackling you for being such a clown.

    You wanted to be the village idiot of another thread by sucking Crawford off and trying to say discombolated comments of Houston not being an elite shooter, having no leadership skills, crossing over is the only way to create your own shot and only H20 being a spot up shooter who can't create his own shot.

    Mamaguebo, DonChris is a Allan Houston hater, but atleast he does it proper and accepts that Houston was good; his agenda is that Houston was overpaid, became injury prone and couldn't add alot of dimensions to his game.

    You're just a complete clown who doesn't accept the facts and tries to say anything just to be in a conversation. You bring nothing to this website, except making good threads into garbage.


    Back to Crawford's suckage

    Dude has gone his whole life without appearing once in the playoffs. He leads a team in scoring, and they suck horribly, coincidence or no?

  3. #108

    Default

    Originally Posted by metrocard
    Another L for fatboy, goes complete off topic when he gets tired of holding his delusional statements in his little fat hand.

    Why would anyone say they play for a D-1 school online but not even name it? You're not even good at lying.

    You're 28 years old and 15 year olds on this site stay tackling you for being such a clown.

    You wanted to be the village idiot of another thread by sucking Crawford off and trying to say discombolated comments of Houston not being an elite shooter, having no leadership skills, crossing over is the only way to create your own shot and only H20 being a spot up shooter who can't create his own shot.

    Mamaguebo, DonChris is a Allan Houston hater, but atleast he does it proper and accepts that Houston was good; his agenda is that Houston was overpaid, became injury prone and couldn't add alot of dimensions to his game.

    You're just a complete clown who doesn't accept the facts and tries to say anything just to be in a conversation. You bring nothing to this website, except making good threads into garbage.


    Back to Crawford's suckage

    Dude has gone his whole life without appearing once in the playoffs. He leads a team in scoring, and they suck horribly, coincidence or no?
    Hmm you really can't figure out why I wouldn't name the school jackass? It was a school in the America East conference and I'll leave it at that. Furthermore the only reason it was mentioned is because you're constantly posting your resume, not to mention your days schedule, as if that somehow legitamises you and makes those of us who disagree with you idiots who know nothing about basketball.

    Hey metrotard when did I write that Allan Houston wasn't good?

    I never wrote the word crossover once. What I have been saying is if you can't handle the ball you can't create your own shot. Everyone from jv level up knows this about the game. Also as I said there are plenty of great players a la Reggie Miller, Ray Allen who can't get their own shot. All these players need to come off screens, have plays run for them, have post presences, playmaking points etc. How you don't understand this simple fact is beyond me.

    Here are the things that were debated between you and I here. Leaving your alter ego MSG aside this is what happened.

    Houston was a very good shooter but not an elite one. Uhh nobody else called him elite besides you.

    Houston was poor defensively. Everybody else agreed with me, not you.

    LJ was the locker room leader not Houston. Everybody else agreed with me, not you.

    Houston wasn't able to create his own shot. Everybody else agreed with me, not you.


    So how did I 'lose' again?

  4. #109
    The Gold Mac MSGKnickz33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    4,474
    Rep Power
    12

    Default

    Originally Posted by Eddy Currys House Special
    Here are the things that were debated between you and I here. Leaving your alter ego MSG aside this is what happened.

    So how did I 'lose' again?

  5. #110
    12th man
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Far far away from the orgy that consist of clyde, 8's, rady, smokes and rono
    Posts
    11,260
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Originally Posted by MSGKnickz33




    TOMAAAAA

  6. #111
    The Gold Mac MSGKnickz33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    4,474
    Rep Power
    12

    Default


  7. #112
    Newbie lithuania's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    17
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Crawford war. Nice

  8. #113
    12th man
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Far far away from the orgy that consist of clyde, 8's, rady, smokes and rono
    Posts
    11,260
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Crawford needs to go.

  9. #114
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    12
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Players like Crawford (and Curry) are the antithesis of winners...
    in other words, they pretty much SUCK!

  10. #115
    Veteran TunerAddict's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    2,183
    Rep Power
    8

    Default

    Originally Posted by Eddy Currys House Special
    Hmm you really can't figure out why I wouldn't name the school jackass? It was a school in the America East conference and I'll leave it at that. Furthermore the only reason it was mentioned is because you're constantly posting your resume, not to mention your days schedule, as if that somehow legitamises you and makes those of us who disagree with you idiots who know nothing about basketball.

    Hey metrotard when did I write that Allan Houston wasn't good?

    I never wrote the word crossover once. What I have been saying is if you can't handle the ball you can't create your own shot. Everyone from jv level up knows this about the game. Also as I said there are plenty of great players a la Reggie Miller, Ray Allen who can't get their own shot. All these players need to come off screens, have plays run for them, have post presences, playmaking points etc. How you don't understand this simple fact is beyond me.

    Here are the things that were debated between you and I here. Leaving your alter ego MSG aside this is what happened.

    Houston was a very good shooter but not an elite one. Uhh nobody else called him elite besides you.

    Houston was poor defensively. Everybody else agreed with me, not you.

    LJ was the locker room leader not Houston. Everybody else agreed with me, not you.

    Houston wasn't able to create his own shot. Everybody else agreed with me, not you.


    So how did I 'lose' again?
    American East for real? Stony brook? UMBC? Albany? Bing?

    I'm going to Bing next year for college.

  11. #116
    The Gold Mac MSGKnickz33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    4,474
    Rep Power
    12

    Default

    Originally Posted by metrocard
    Toons, first of all, I'm being realistic when I say I saw 50-60 Knicks games. By reading your post I doubt you've watched half as many games.

    Time to end this thread debate for once and for all.

    Paul1355, you tripping.

    20 and 5 means nothing.
    Crawford gets 40 minutes a game. Do you think his 20 and 5 out impresses guys like Kobe, Paul, or other all star players who gets 40 minutes a game?

    Crawford isn't efficient.
    He gets 20 and 5 because he was allowed to dominate the ball and take majority of the perimeter shots.

    That lead to a lot of LOSING, fact.
    Why?
    Crawford isn't a player who can lead a team, instead he forces the team to watch himself play like a clown.
    A lot of isolation, missed shots, bad decisions with the ball and a lot of indecisive overall. He's a TERRIBLE first option and was the WORST first option in the NBA last season. Find me someone worse, thank you.

    Crawford wouldn't even be an efficient 3rd option on a WINNING TEAM.
    He belongs on the bench similar to Eddie House.

    You guys act like bitches about "Knicks counting on Crawford"
    Thats 100% bull****.
    Isiah gave this team to Crawford, does that excuse Crawford for playing like a dumbass all the time?
    No.

    Toons,


    Crawford isn't a good ball handler because he tries too hard to be fancy and doesn't make the right decisions with the ball. His basketball IQ is as low as it gets for a guy who's been in this league for so long (Whats this, his 6th or 7th year? Dude is already vet and plays like an 8th grader) and gets so many minutes.

    Who said Crawford sucks?
    He's a C level player.
    Thats average.
    Crawford just sucks **** as being the primary player on your team.
    **** ESPN and you're made up **** you have no SOURCE of providing here, just something you heard in your delusional Crawford-manlove mind. If you could provide an article or vid where a sports journalist said then, then do it; if not shut the **** up about it.
    So yeh, **** ESPN here's a fact.
    When Crawford is the primary option of your team.
    Your team is bound for the lottery.
    Your team is bound for a 50-60 loss season.
    Don't believe me?
    Look at Crawford's glory in the Bulls.
    Look at the Knicks the last 3-4 seasons under Crawford.
    It seems like we got WORSE when Crawford's role got bigger, check out the records.


    Crawford caused a lot of problems on the court, he played like the biggest dumbass on the Knicks and put us in a losing situation every game. But once or twice a season he would hit a game winning shot, while missing 15-20 of those, but still being proclaimed as "clutch" by the Crawfordsexuals. Funny right?

    You acting like a bitch right now, no snitching? **** that Cam'ron ****.
    If you don't like Isiah, how the hell can you like Crawford? Isiah is Crawford's Don. Crawford wore his number in dedication to Isiah and Isiah made Crawford untradable when he should of been traded two seasons ago.
    Crawford didn't say **** because Isiah had his back. So obviously a Crawfordsexual wouldn't beef with Isiah and Isiahsexuals so much.

    Marbury was tired of the losing and the manlove between Crawford/Isiah. He came to NYC to rep his hometown, and these midwest faggots weren't repping the Garden right. Marbury had EVERY RIGHT to call out Isiah's punkass for soiling the Garden with his draft blunders, free agent failures and complete debacles on trading with other teams making them better.

    How DARE you even take defense of a bitch like Isiah just for the sake of your homeboy Crawford. You pick this team first, and Isiah and Crawford hurted this team too much for them to be defended. A Knick fan defending Crawford is like Bush coming to the defense of the Taliban.

    Son, I got like 20 other paragraphs I could DESTROY Crawford with, I've been bashing Crawford for 3+ years already and got a ****load of information and facts that would already make this thread burn more than its already burn.

    Don't challenge me, **** Team Starbury...thats just a sarcastic thing; sensitive Isiahsexuals like you need to fall back and stop taking jokes so serious.

    Crawford has to go.
    LosingEST player in the NBA
    Heres a fact from not too long ago.

    Miami, Minnesota, Memphis, Seattle and New York are on pace to finish below the Crawford Line (.307) this season -- the most teams to finish with fewer than 26 wins since 2000-01. The Crawford Line is named in honor of New York Knicks guard Jamal Crawford, who has a career winning percentage of .307, worst among active players with at least 400 games played.




    a classic post from metro....good work as always fam

  12. #117
    12th man
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Far far away from the orgy that consist of clyde, 8's, rady, smokes and rono
    Posts
    11,260
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Powerful thread

  13. #118
    Veteran StEpHoN_mArBuRy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Queenz
    Posts
    3,086
    Rep Power
    15

    Default

    kevin Martin > Jamal Crawford

  14. #119
    The Gold Mac MSGKnickz33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    4,474
    Rep Power
    12

    Thumbs up Some More Reasons.....

    why crawford sucks


    Crawford aint close to being a good shooter. He shoots 41% from the field and 35.6% from 3pt range. Thats terrible for someone who takes 17.4 shots a game and only hits 7.1 of them. You cant find many shooting guards that shoot worse then Crawford.

    He averages more 3 point attempts per game then free throws. Like i already pointed out Crawford only shoots 35.6% which has him ranked 81st in the league. So why would he shoot more 3's instead of driving to the hoop trying to get fouled and shoot free throws? Because hes dumb and he sucks.

    His 41% field goal percentage has him ranked 48th in the league (guards only) which means most teams have a point guard and a shooting guard that shoots better then crawford.

    On top of all this he plays no defense so please...i dont want to ever see anyone defend crawford again. Hes gotta career winning percentage of about 32%...he sucks just like the thread title says.

    Marbury>>Crawford (not close)

    I wanna post this one more time

    Crawford-41%fg (Ranked 48th amongst guards)
    35.6% 3PT (Ranked 81st amongst all players)


    So how is Crawford good? He cant shoot. He doesnt defend.

    Why the f*** does everyone bring up marbury and say they want him outta here so bad....when no one can compare to Crawfords entire career of losing. None of this starbarians team starbury haterburys stuff would be on here if people said "I want Marbury, Crawford, Randolph, and Curry gone." Although i dont think marbury is a problem at least that quote would be identifying the 3 largest problems left (Isiah was the biggest problem). But to mention marbury and not bring up those other 3 players....it just shows that the posters are biased and have something against Marbury. I dont respect that. Zach Randolph punched a teammate in Portland and he threw water at nate robinson. Crawford is selfish and he cant win...and Curry doesnt care about basketball. I cant respect you haterburys






  15. #120
    Your Best Bet is B Ez datruth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    new york
    Posts
    1,553
    Rep Power
    11

    Default

    okay this FG% shyt is kind of an overrated stat:

    Baron Davis: 42 FG%, 33% from 3(6.4 3PT attempts and only making 2) and shoots 5.2 FTS a game, so he takes more 3 point shots then FTs, does that make em a bum??

    baron davis is another chucker, does that make em selfish too???

Similar Threads

  1. Official Walt Clyde Frazier Thread
    By metrocard in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 47
    Last Post: Mar 09, 2012, 14:01
  2. The Official EURO 2008 thread
    By rady in forum Other Sports
    Replies: 117
    Last Post: Jul 14, 2008, 22:08
  3. Replies: 177
    Last Post: Jul 04, 2008, 19:58
  4. where's marbury?
    By reckoning in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: Jun 25, 2008, 18:17
  5. The Official "Any Ideas?" Thread
    By MSGKnickz33 in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: Dec 16, 2007, 12:39

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •