Howard Eisley was the type of player who didnt look to do much statistically, he played within the teams system, kept his turnovers down, and did what he was asked. If you asked me who I would rather have runnin the point, Crawford or Eisley I would say Eisley. Ill admit that Crawford has more ability as a player but what good is his ability when he doesnt use it? I would like to see better shot selection, less stupid turnovers, and more effort on defense from him. Everyone thinks I hate Crawford but I have said before thats not the case. He pisses me off but in his defense its not his fault that he plays 42 minutes a game. He should be comin off the bench playing about half that.