he averaged 8, but honestly Knight was always a decent PG through out his career, he was even a good PG when he first got drafted and was on the Cavs, just never got the chance to play I guess, because of his size
Ok, I just remember him being at the top of the leagues leaders in assists a few years back when Larry Brown wanted to trade for him.
I guess now you members in this forum know why I dont like Donnie Walsh or D'Antoni as part of this Knick Organization.
They want to sit on their fanny and do nothing but pick up the phone and find out that "David Lee" is the most desired player teams want to trade the Knicks for. Every Knick Fan could have told them this last year.
The Knicks had a chance to get some Prominent veteran Stars last offseason and this season with trading David Lee with a Knick Cancer Player.
And Walsh want to trade David Lee for the 5th pick. Not the 3rd pick, but the 5th pick. All you so-call Knick Fans that went along with this got a short memory of all the players that were offered for David Lee.
We will start with Ron Artest or J.O'Neal (when Walsh was incharge Frye or Lee).
If anyone want to say that a quick-fix dont work well, than "Walsh & D'Antoni" is proof of that.
Yes, I would admit that the Knicks should have FIRED and sued Isiah Thomas the day after the verdict of the Annucha Trail, and gave the reigns of the 2007-8 Knick season to the next in command at President, G.M., and Head Coach. How bad could the Knick Team do from a 23 win season? other than get us one of the 4 draft picks.
Hiring another Knick rival to replace Isiah like Donnie Walsh instead of Larry Bird or even Kiki Vandeweigh who learned from his mistakes with Denver was not a bright idea.
The Fans Boo's, NBA commentators, and New York Sports Writers are all jumping on Donnie Walsh and D'Antoni case after the draft with the words "Flawed Roster".
This will make the "Two Idiots" in charge do something quick before the media carry it any further.
The Knicks had the $Money$ to buy the rights to SG-Charmer too, who happen to be a very impressive SG inwhich the Knicks roster only have one SG on it.
Yes! I said it, both Walsh & D'Antoni are idiots which planned on getting paid for doing nothing but blaming the roster that Isiah left them.
But The New York Sports Media and Fans will change that fast.
Thanks to the Fans that BOOOED the Knicks selection on draft night.
Last edited by LOIOSH30; Jun 28, 2008 at 08:38.
Majority of Bobcat fans want him traded. He's a very streak and immature PG.
A lot of people complain about Felton because he can't score very well but takes a lot of shots.
Talented player, but doesn't know how to run an offense.
Do your research next time before giving you opinion.
Keep in mind; David Lee is a very good power forward at age 25. He averaged about 11 pts and 9 rebounds in 29 minutes. The whole Knicks team and coaching staff was messed up.....they played people like Zach Randolph more bc of salary but Lee should have gotten 35 minutes plus. He would get 10 minutes one night and 35 another night but when he got minutes he delivered every time. He averaged 18 pts and 12 rebounds in his last 15 games when he got big minutes
Felton isn't as bad as you make him out to be. He runs the floor well and he's a good passer. I would want more for Lee but a future first round pick is good since the Bobcats show no signs of being a winning team any time in the near future. There center is weak and their best scorer J. Richardson is inconsistent and will have trouble in Larry Brown's defense first system.
Felton would be a good back up guard for us and next years first rounder would also be a great addition. The trade makes sense for a rebuilding team. Lee's a back up. Trading a back up for a back up and a future pick makes sense.
Felton thinks he's a starter, thats good for him. I don't see him taking a seat on the bench as a former top 5 pick. He wants to play big minutes, but with the way the plays; I don't see him playing for a winning team. Needs a lot of maturity, the talent is there really. He's as talented as Williams or Paul, but he still plays like a college kid.
This Felton for Lee trade is stupid. Is Felton really better than Bayless or DJ Augustin, who we passed on? David Lee has never been given the chance to shine, like he did in the NBA Rookie vs Sophomore game (30 points, 11 rebounds, 14-14 shooting). This is a trade that will bite the Knicks in the butt, once Lee is given the minutes he deserves. I like Felton, but not for Lee, NOT FOR LEE, PUH-LEEEEEEEEESE!
Lee won't be a Knick after his contract expires. His agent has alread said hes going to be looking for 10 + million a year.
I know you love Marbury but even if he aveages 40ppg and 20 assists this is his last season so we need a plan for the future.
OH YEAH WERE GETTING A FUTURE NUMBER ONE PICK ALONG WITH FELTON. I say make that a 2010 #1 pick so we have one that season.
i dont like felton, he isnt cosistant, sometimes u dont even kno he's in da court, way too streaky, i dont see how he improves the team anyway, he's a better scorer then passer and he's not even dat good of a scorer
The Bobcats grabbing one of the Top-3 PG in this draft with their first pick shows they are on the right track. Now they have a Pure PG in DJ Augustin whom only plays the PG position for combo-guard Felton and SG-J.Richardson.
Nice Trio in the backcourt for HOF Head Coach Larry Brown system.
The Knicks should sucker the Bobcats into a trade for Jamal Crawford for Felton.
Those who want David Lee traded from this Knick Team are saying they want a frontcourt of C-Curry and PF-Zach with no rebounding Jefferies as their backups...
do we honestly have to trade David Lee..i mean if he is going to be crazy about his next contract offer then it's a must but if we can get rid of some guys and keep Lee so we can gurantee him to stay and have Danillo at the 3 and Lee at the 4 our defense wouldn't be superb but our movement and offensives threat would be pretty decent for those two alone. And Lee's rebound numbers are the most important thing about him and if we give him we better get a damn good guy guaranteed to help this club Lee is too much of an asset.If we get shot blocking center then defense on the 3 and 4 spots wouldn't be as stressed about. Honestly we should keep Lee because he's a rebounding machine and is improving offensively every year and he can move good in a D'Antoni system dont forget Lee was a big dunker back in the day and he's proven that white men can jump. I think Lee is more valuable then Nate robinson even Nate is great, Lee has too many positives.