Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 19

Thread: Q Richardson is a snitch.

  1. #1
    12th man
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Far far away from the orgy that consist of clyde, 8's, rady, smokes and rono
    Posts
    11,260
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Q Richardson is a snitch.

    He is the one talking sh*t about Marbury reference locker room disturbance, etc. Q played under D'Antony and he knows that D will listen to anything he says. Q should be THE first to be bought out, because he is totally out of shape and can contribute nothing to this team except this fake leadership attitude.
    We have a lot of bitch ass n*ggas on this team that like to hide their failures behind one man.

  2. #2
    Veteran GetRealistic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,370
    Rep Power
    9

    Default

    Are you related to Marbury or something. God you spend so much of your time trying to stick up for a guy who has done nothing for you. I'm fairly certain that Donnie and D'Antoni have atleast spoken to every player on this roster via a phone call, and my guess from the reports is that 80 percent of the players have given negitive feedback on Marbury. Not to mention D'Antoni has been around Steph previously. I'm also positive Donnie Walsh called up his former coach Larry Brown and asked for a report on Marbury and i'm sure that wasn't a glowing endorsement. (Marbury and Brown butted heads on the Olympic team before he even was the Knicks head coach).

    You may love Marbury as a player and a person, but even the biggest Marbury fan has to admit he's got a bad reputation and its not all hype many of his criticisms are warranted. I mean remember when KG bashed Marbury after the blow out in Boston this year. KG and Marbury were friends and even KG laid into him.

    But hey nothing is certain, this still is the Knicks there known for bad decisions. That being said they'll keep Marbury and have yet another incident happen that means he has no trade value.

    Why not just trade him, or better yet buy him out. It's better for every single person involved including Marbury. He'll even be able to have some new colors on his shoes so all you shoe lovers will be happy.


    You said it yourself Metro we are not going to be good, so why does it matter if hes on the team or not.

  3. #3
    Veteran
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    7,297
    Rep Power
    20

    Default

    Q.Rich has always been a Lockerroom divider!!!

  4. #4
    Veteran LJ4ptplay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Ft. Collins, CO
    Posts
    2,950
    Rep Power
    12

    Default

    Oh, so it's Q. Rich's fault now. It's always somebody else's fault. I'm sure Donnie just interviewed Q. and then made his decision (sarcasm).

  5. #5
    Veteran Trin_Starr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Trumbull, CT
    Posts
    1,093
    Rep Power
    12

    Default

    I've always felt Q Rich is an ass.
    He's always ready to run his mouth and act tough - but work on ur damn game fool - loose some weight and make some shots and maybe you will be respected as ball player.
    Last edited by Trin_Starr; Jul 08, 2008 at 11:24.

  6. #6
    Your Best Bet is B Ez datruth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    new york
    Posts
    1,553
    Rep Power
    12

    Default

    i understand if Q is the only one sayin things about marbury but if its most of the team if not the whole team talkin about Q, i see no problem

  7. #7
    OG GoKnIcKsDLEE42's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Long Island
    Posts
    1,399
    Rep Power
    9

    Default

    Q-Snitch...

  8. #8
    Member brooklyn_baller318's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    133
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    every single one of you except for getrealistic is out of your minds...
    90 percent of the team does not like the atmosphere marbury brings to the team... donnie and dantoni have spoken to many different sources concerning marbury including marbury himself... one man would not sway the opinion either way.... you all love marbury no matter what and will stick up for him rather than face any concept of reality.... the only reason marbury may even stay around is cuz of the expiring contract otherwise hes a waste to the knicks and their efforts to grow as a team

  9. #9
    Veteran jpz17's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    2,782
    Rep Power
    10

    Default

    Q-Rich-the-snitch

  10. #10
    Veteran TunerAddict's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    2,183
    Rep Power
    9

    Default

    Originally Posted by metrocard
    He is the one talking sh*t about Marbury reference locker room disturbance, etc. Q played under D'Antony and he knows that D will listen to anything he says. Q should be THE first to be bought out, because he is totally out of shape and can contribute nothing to this team except this fake leadership attitude.
    We have a lot of bitch ass n*ggas on this team that like to hide their failures behind one man.

    Link? Evidence? Or is this just your suspicion?

  11. #11
    Veteran StEpHoN_mArBuRy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Queenz
    Posts
    3,086
    Rep Power
    16

    Default

    (PA speaker)

    33333333333333 POINT BALL QUE--TIN---SNITCHARDSON !!!

  12. #12
    Veteran jpz17's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    2,782
    Rep Power
    10

    Default

    I do have to say, when healthy he is a great shooter. But he shouldn't play on a team with this many "bosses" on court. Steph is boss, Zach is boss, Q is boss, Jammal is boss, and Zach is boss. Our whole lineup is filled with players who can only be "in charge" and can't take being quality team players. Q might be good on a team like SAS or LA, but not on a team filled with attitude problems.

  13. #13
    Quiet Storm New New York's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    2,431
    Rep Power
    16

    Default

    First off how do we know it is Q?

    Second, and I think that Da Truth touched on it, but Q isnt the only one sounding off against Steph!

    I'm sorry but you dudes who sweat Marbaury are really confused! Steph puts his coach and other players on blast and he is showing leadership, but someone talks about him and they're a snitch.

    Again please prove it was Q, and then find two players or coaches who contradict the statements made.

    Also it's not like Q won't tell dude to his face how he feels, remember security had to stop Q from mashing Steph out after practice once, so I think that you can pop off at the mouth about someone behind their back if you're willing to say it face to face!

  14. #14
    KnicksonLIN.com
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    3,073
    Rep Power
    11

    Default

    Whether metrocard's statement is true or not, Q-Hitch is an out of shape scrub. I never wanted him on this team to begin with. Kurt Thomas is a way better rebounder, defender, and shooter than Q-Hitch. I was disgusted at the trade, when I first heard about it. Q-Hitch is a one hit wonder that had 1 good year with the Clippers and then choked for almost his entire NBA career. He has the talent to be good(like a lot of players on the Knicks) but he doesn't lose weight, and it leads to him always getting injured and struggling with his jump shot and defense. In his 3 seasons in New York, he's averaged a combined 9.76 points, 37.7% fg, 34.6% 3pt, 5.3 rebounds, and 1.9 assists. A lot of people on this site bash Tim Thomas, but at least he shot a good fg%, and at least he consistently scored 10-15 points a game. With Quentin Richardson, you never know what to expect. One night, he'll have 15 points, 7 rebounds, and 3 assists, on 50% shooting, and the next night he'll have 4 points, 1 rebound, and 1 assist, on 29% shooting. I like Richardson's leadership qualities, but it just isn't worth the 8 million dollars that he's making. He needs to be packaged in a trade ASAP.

  15. #15
    12th man
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Far far away from the orgy that consist of clyde, 8's, rady, smokes and rono
    Posts
    11,260
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Originally Posted by brooklyn_baller318
    every single one of you except for getrealistic is out of your minds...
    90 percent of the team does not like the atmosphere marbury brings to the team... donnie and dantoni have spoken to many different sources concerning marbury including marbury himself... one man would not sway the opinion either way.... you all love marbury no matter what and will stick up for him rather than face any concept of reality.... the only reason marbury may even stay around is cuz of the expiring contract otherwise hes a waste to the knicks and their efforts to grow as a team
    False.
    Stop being paranoid, its obvious Marbury won't be here in 2010.

    Originally Posted by New New York
    First off how do we know it is Q?

    Second, and I think that Da Truth touched on it, but Q isnt the only one sounding off against Steph!

    I'm sorry but you dudes who sweat Marbaury are really confused! Steph puts his coach and other players on blast and he is showing leadership, but someone talks about him and they're a snitch.

    Again please prove it was Q, and then find two players or coaches who contradict the statements made.

    Also it's not like Q won't tell dude to his face how he feels, remember security had to stop Q from mashing Steph out after practice once, so I think that you can pop off at the mouth about someone behind their back if you're willing to say it face to face!
    Malik Rose is a scrub too.

    You rather have Q-Snitch and Maweak Rose over Starbury and his expiring? Yuck.

    There are various quotes of Q beefing off with teammates, and if you watch the games you could see Q-Rich doing a lot of talking on the bench and the lack of communication there is between Q and Marbury.

    Marbury never put his coach or players on blast withOUT reason.

    So you are the one confused.

    Marbury called out Isiah for making Curry the center piece.
    He called out for forcing Marbury to play a passive role which resulted in a worst record.
    Everything Marbury has said could be justify and thats what ends it.

    If Isiah just built around Stephon properly with shooters, defenders, and a legit big man; we wouldn't have this problem. Isiah beefed with Marbury and threw him in the back of the bus. How the hell do you expect Marbury to react?

    I'm really to begin to think you guys are retarded now; you constantly ignore all these factors that has happend in the past and act like Marbury is wilding out for no apparent reason. It makes uncomfortable to debate with you guys since you're not seeing reality and just have the Daily New's dick in your face.

    Just some real talk.

    If you're a Knick, remember the last 3-5 years deeply.
    Recongize the FACTORS that created the cause and effect in past history.
    If you do this with logic and reason, you could actually see where I and many others are coming from.


    I never said I wanted Marbury apart of the Knicks future.

    All I said is that I want Marbury on this team next season, we don't have a legit PG, we don't have an expiring contract like Marbury, and we wouldn't have any ballers to represent NYC on the team(okay, weak reason but all my NYC heads should know whats up)

    Marbury hate is just a played out trend.

    Originally Posted by abcd
    Whether metrocard's statement is true or not, Q-Hitch is an out of shape scrub. I never wanted him on this team to begin with. Kurt Thomas is a way better rebounder, defender, and shooter than Q-Hitch. I was disgusted at the trade, when I first heard about it. Q-Hitch is a one hit wonder that had 1 good year with the Clippers and then choked for almost his entire NBA career. He has the talent to be good(like a lot of players on the Knicks) but he doesn't lose weight, and it leads to him always getting injured and struggling with his jump shot and defense. In his 3 seasons in New York, he's averaged a combined 9.76 points, 37.7% fg, 34.6% 3pt, 5.3 rebounds, and 1.9 assists. A lot of people on this site bash Tim Thomas, but at least he shot a good fg%, and at least he consistently scored 10-15 points a game. With Quentin Richardson, you never know what to expect. One night, he'll have 15 points, 7 rebounds, and 3 assists, on 50% shooting, and the next night he'll have 4 points, 1 rebound, and 1 assist, on 29% shooting.


    Good stuff.

    Another thing I want to point out is that I never stated this was factual.
    It was just a look from my perspective on things.
    Richardson always been a problem in the locker room, and its funny you guys complain about Marbury so much when we have guys like Rose, Robinson, Richardson, James and Curry acting like clowns.

    Originally Posted by GetRealistic
    Are you related to Marbury or something.
    You gotta be more creative than that.

    Good post on repeating yourself again.
    Last edited by metrocard; Jul 08, 2008 at 19:37.

Similar Threads

  1. ESPN: Michael Ray Richardson Free Tickets!
    By ESPNQF in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Nov 21, 2006, 11:46
  2. Jeffries a Knick. Is there room for Richardson?
    By donchris in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: Aug 14, 2006, 10:12
  3. QuEntin Richardson.. Tuff enough?
    By donchris in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: Oct 30, 2005, 01:05
  4. Trade Reported: KT for Q Richardson
    By rady in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: Jun 23, 2005, 18:41
  5. Q Richardson
    By e_D in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: Jun 02, 2004, 14:17

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •