Originally Posted by
Knicks4lyfe
How does it make sense that the new century would begin a year after 0? would you then say that 2001 would really begin in 2002? You'd have too with your logic. The year OF the new century would be the actual year after 99. That year would be 0. Which in this case would be 2000, not 2001. I was born the year of 1978. Does that mean I was born in 1979? No. So logically the year of the new century would be the first year, which starts in year zero, until you get through 365 days which would then put you a year into the new century. 2001-2002 would be year one headed to two, which would be past the first year of the century. So no, prophecy really shot there. But it also said the big city will burn before the third big war, only the buildings burned, not the whole NYC, and secondly, unless you know something the rest of us don't, this did not ignite a third big war.