Davis (21 ppg 4 rebs 8 assist)
Gordon(13 ppg 35% 3pt)
Thorton(15 ppg 6 rebs)
Camby(10 ppg 13 rebs 3 blk)
Kaman(17 ppg 9 rebs 1.7 blks)
not a bad starting 5.
Knicks failed tho
Davis (21 ppg 4 rebs 8 assist)
Gordon(13 ppg 35% 3pt)
Thorton(15 ppg 6 rebs)
Camby(10 ppg 13 rebs 3 blk)
Kaman(17 ppg 9 rebs 1.7 blks)
not a bad starting 5.
Knicks failed tho
I kind of have to agree with you now. At first I was willing to give Donnie a chance. I figured he was trying to get something better. But now I just wish we had taken the deal in the first place. We're going to regret this decision if we still have Randolph on the team this year.
I don't understand what Donnie and Mike D are doing. If we had done the same deal the Nuggets did for Camby, we would have wiped away Zach's contract immediately and would have got a $10 million trade exception. Our cap situation would have been solved NOW and we could have had money to sign a decent free-agent before 2011 to go along with Lebron, Bosh or Wade. Or we could have had Camby on our team this year.
I'm depressed. I had hope in Donnie, but now I'm starting to wonder. I don't like how Donnie is taking his time. If he hasn't noticed, the rest of the league has moved quickly and we stood around waiting while everybody else has improved.
One thing i dont understand is why the #1 priority it to trade Randolph. Why isnt it to trade curry? At least randolph is solid fundamentally. I would rather see z-bo at center then curry at center. Were gonna need some rebounding....last time i checked curry doesnt rebound.
I dont see how this trade makes sense for either team, especially the nuggets. The clippers needed a power forward who can score. I see camby as more of a power forward then chris kaman...camby actually did used to play power forward. And i think he can prove me wrong and score if he has to. Ive seen him run the floor like a point guard...and hes got an ok jumpshot.
This makes no sense for the nuggets. There problem was that they didnt play defense...so how they gonna trade the only player on their team that plays defense? From now on im callin them the Enver Nuggets, without the D.
No offense to Zach haters but wouldnt Lee at PF and Zach at Center give us a million rebounds, atelast there is a positivie with Zach at center since Curry is the only center on this team. Like Pat Riley says, rebounds wins games.
THANK YOU! I'm tired of everyone making Zach Randolph the #1 trade priority. I understand he's overpaid, but damn. At least he's productive. Eddy Curry averages 13 points, 4 rebounds, and .5 blocks. If I didn't know Curry was 6-11, I would've assumed he was a small forward. Curry plays soft. He's overweight. Eddy Curry's been in the NBA for 7 years. It should be clear by now that Curry will never be a good defender, rebounder, free throw shooter, passer, conditioner, or player period. Zach Randolph, unlike Curry, has been on winning teams before. He's been to the playoffs two times in his career. Curry has never been to the playoffs, and a lot of it is his fault. The center position is the main position where you need defense and rebounding from, because if your center doesn't play defense or rebound, point guards could just snatch the rebounds from you and drive the basketball to the basket all game long.
PS- Eddy Curry has 3 YEARS and 31 MILLION DOLLARS left on his contract.
He has a chance to opt out, in 2010, but HE'S NOT GOING TO OPT OUT.
Co-sign MSG's post
really though, who the hell going take curry??? we all kno randolph better then curry but tradin randolph is much more realistic though i think randolph can fit the system well
Mike D'Antoni should say, if Eddy Curry doesn't opt out, I will bench him forever