I'm not completely anti-war. War, because of how the world is set up, can be necessary. If a government is actively (operative word) committing genocide, or engaging in unprovoked belligerent acts against its neighbors, war is necessary, obviously.
However, this is not what the United States has done, for the most part, if you look at the history of this country. This war was fought on the pretext that nuclear and biological weapons were being kept in Iraq. Because we felt Israel could be struck by these, we sacrificed over a million lives. Turned out that they had none of these weapons, and we should have allowed inspectors to continue doing their jobs, which is what they asked us to do. Documents were forged and the whole thing was being pushed since the Clinton administration, by Neocons.
Even the just wars that we've engaged in have been for selfish reasons. During WWII, the holocaust was taking place, but we only entered the war when Japan bombed Pearl Harbor. During WWI, we didn't enter until the Zimmerman note, sent by Germany and asking for the invasion of the United States by Mexico, was intercepted. We didn't enter the Civil War to stop slavery, we did so as the result of economic conflict between slave states and free states, as the US moved to settle the lands stolen from Mexico.
So, bottom line is that we have engaged, by and large, in amoral war. I do not support war, if it's immoral (done for the wrong reasons). Amoral (not done out of goodness) war can be right, if, at the least, the nation fought is engaging in evil. You need to decide what you are first, a Christian or an American. Since Christians can be born anywhere, and under any political conditions, your mixing of politics and religion is almost anti-Christian.
*Also, Barack never said that he was wrong about the surge, which is what you claim. If he did say that, please quote the question and the answer. Don't play those type of games. A few Al Qaeda fighters are also incapable of taking control of a country where they are not even citizens and cannot speak Iraqi Arabic, that has never, Paul: they're not trying to settle the country, bring their families to live there. What you propose has never happened. Also, most of the people who fought the US in Iraq were not Al-Qaeda. Again, you're repeating what the Bush administration likes to say, in order to justify attacking Iraq, claims of Iraq funding Al-Qaeda, providing bases, etc. All that's a lie, for the simple fact that Al-Qaeda hated Saddam for being a secular leader, who allowed women to hold jobs, drive cars and go to school. Again, do you research, before talking.