Duhon is a very slow PG...needs to be limited in minutes.

Paul1355

All Star
LOL-Calvin_and_Hobbes.jpg


Idk which part u laughed at. I basically agreed with you. Marbury is better than Duhon on offense.

And do you forget that you said once that CHandler should be a SG???

Yea you did. So did Walt Frazier during an analysis of Chandler in the summer league.

So whats so funny? lol
 

GetRealistic

Starter
Paul you gotta stop... I even agree with Metro (very rare occurance) that Chandler is not at all close to a Point Forward. He doesn't have the ball handling, court vision, or passing ability to be a point forward. And thats not a knock on Chandler at all. Chandler seems like hes going to be a steal of a draft pick, but there are very few players in this league that have the skill set to be a point forward. Scottie Pippen and even to an extent Toni Kukoc were rare talent sets. I firmly believe Chandler will be a good player but he projects more to the level of a Shawn Marion who plays great in the open floor and in iso situations then a Scottie Pippen who could run the entire offense.

From scouting report Galo seems to have the makeup of a Point forward but the problem is he's still 19 and hasn't had an offical practice this season yet. IF you expect to see Galo come in and be a point forward from day one your crazy. Maybe come January you will see glimpses but to put that much on a 19 year old is crazy. Two or 3 years down the road he could very well be that player but for now i'm sure he'll be used to spread the floor and knock down jumpers. Something we desperately need.


P.S. Duhon has been far from the problem. I think people should really look and be happy with what hes brought us. Take away the first game where he had 7 turnovers and he's only had 12 over the next 5 games. He's also shot 44.4 % from three. Oh yea hes our best on the ball perimeter defender. Marbury shows flashes of defense but he doesn't bring it every night. Also Marbury and even Mardy Collins are more suited to guard SG's or even certain small forwards.
 
Last edited:

portega1968

El Cacique
In any other offense, the dialogue would vary but in this particular offense, IMO:

Duhon PG + Marbury SG >>>> any other backcourt combo

PG Duhon >>> PG Collins >>> any other player at PG

SG Marbury >>> SG Nate >>> SG QRich >>> SG Crawford

Nate first guard off the bench.... Stephon runs PG for various plays until Collins spells Duhon. I would barely use Nate at PG and Jamal never at all.

I don't want Marbury running the offense more than 20% of the times down the floor... I want him to let Duhon or Collins do that for most of the game while he focuses most of his minutes on scoring.

Crawford needs to be traded as well as Curry. We're in a catch22 with them 'cause if we play them they may not help the team enough to warrant those minutes, whereas if we bench them their value just falls. IMO, the bench is preferable as they would be challenged to make the most of any minutes they get.

I agree with D'Antoni that Chandler is better suited at the 4spot in this offense where other PFs would have a very hard time guarding him. Danilo should be at the SF where he would just shoot over any defender... until he's able, we will just have to move Chandler to the SF and have Randolph at the PF (Randolph must also be traded if we ever hope to get under the cap by 2010).

Until we get a center, Lee will have to do. He's may favorite player on this team (no homo) and he could be on his way to an AllStar berth... but I think his value is maximized with the energy he's known to bring off the bench.
 

portega1968

El Cacique
you copyrighted no homo?

Ill use that or any other word whenever the fuk I want.

Or is it that you're a Crawford junkie and just came at me (no homo) 'cause I hurt your feelings?

Please don't get on my nuts and learn to respect your elders.
 

GetRealistic

Starter
you copyrighted no homo?

Ill use that or any other word whenever the fuk I want.

Or is it that you're a Crawford junkie and just came at me (no homo) 'cause I hurt your feelings?

Please don't get on my nuts and learn to respect your elders.



I can't respect an elder who tries for some reason or another to be young by using phrases like that (incorrectly at that). But hey good luck with that mid life crisis of yours. Lease a new sports car yet? Make sure to watch the World series they have tons of commercials for Viagra and what not.
 

portega1968

El Cacique
Its not that you cant respect, its that you HAVE 2 respect dude regardless of how I choose to talk... you just sound inmature calling out an older person for shit like this, you know? Youre better off ignoring it.

I'm not trying to look young... I feel young and will still feel that way after Im 60. If you plan on feeling old when you reach my age, youre gonna be one grumpy old fart. Pray that you still have my attitude by then or be prepared to be miserable.

Midlife crises? new sports car? Viagra?

Dang Getrealistic (what the fuk does that mean by the way, I guess its something my generation cant comprehend)... can you be less creative with your comebacks? stay away from the age cliches Crawford groupie.

Yes, because its not my use of no homo that got you talking... its your obsession with #11.

Just because you think my nuts hang down to my ankles doesn't mean you can swing on 'em... please get off (no homo, no homo, no homo, no homo)
 
Last edited:

Paul1355

All Star
Paul you gotta stop... I even agree with Metro (very rare occurance) that Chandler is not at all close to a Point Forward. He doesn't have the ball handling, court vision, or passing ability to be a point forward. And thats not a knock on Chandler at all. Chandler seems like hes going to be a steal of a draft pick, but there are very few players in this league that have the skill set to be a point forward. Scottie Pippen and even to an extent Toni Kukoc were rare talent sets. I firmly believe Chandler will be a good player but he projects more to the level of a Shawn Marion who plays great in the open floor and in iso situations then a Scottie Pippen who could run the entire offense.

From scouting report Galo seems to have the makeup of a Point forward but the problem is he's still 19 and hasn't had an offical practice this season yet. IF you expect to see Galo come in and be a point forward from day one your crazy. Maybe come January you will see glimpses but to put that much on a 19 year old is crazy. Two or 3 years down the road he could very well be that player but for now i'm sure he'll be used to spread the floor and knock down jumpers. Something we desperately need.


P.S. Duhon has been far from the problem. I think people should really look and be happy with what hes brought us. Take away the first game where he had 7 turnovers and he's only had 12 over the next 5 games. He's also shot 44.4 % from three. Oh yea hes our best on the ball perimeter defender. Marbury shows flashes of defense but he doesn't bring it every night. Also Marbury and even Mardy Collins are more suited to guard SG's or even certain small forwards.

Okay chill. I can agree. Just that Walt Frazier is a good basketball analyst and he saw Chandler possibly playing a SG one day. So did Metro, so I thought thats what you meant by point forward.
 
Its not that you cant respect, its that you HAVE 2 respect dude regardless of how I choose to talk... you just sound inmature calling out an older person for shit like this, you know? Youre better off ignoring it.

I'm not trying to look young... I feel young and will still feel that way after Im 60. If you plan on feeling old when you reach my age, youre gonna be one grumpy old fart. Pray that you still have my attitude by then or be prepared to be miserable.

Midlife crises? new sports car? Viagra?

Dang Getrealistic (what the fuk does that mean by the way, I guess its something my generation cant comprehend)... can you be less creative with your comebacks? stay away from the age cliches Crawford groupie.

Yes, because its not my use of no homo that got you talking... its your obsession with #11.

Just because you think my nuts hang down to my ankles doesn't mean you can swing on 'em... please get off (no homo, no homo, no homo, no homo)


clowwwnnnnnn
 

portega1968

El Cacique
someone has a dual personality... you think you sly with two usernames

I know you must be tired of getting owned by Metro and MSGKnickz33 over and over and over again... but that don't mean you should be looking to chew my nuts.
 
Last edited:
over and over? what?

i havent had run ins with anyone on here except for...well..you, clown


and you have an infatuation with nuts...willlld homo.


also,no dual personality dummy, i post under one name, and i just started posting here a month or so ago

dont think like an old fart, then you'll start saying words like...old...fart..

real quick,

1. dont use words or terms you dont know how to use or dont use in your daily life, you end up looking like a clown

2. dont bother trying to get other people involved in your temper tantrums,its only going to make you look like more of a clown.

3. dont keep saying stuff about nuts in every post, while i dont have a problem with it, im sure your father would be insulted that his son relates everything back to male genitalia. clown.


oh and no one has to respect you, you get respect by giving it. by throwing your baby fits, you're only proving your infancy bozo
 

TunerAddict

Starter
Guys gotta remember that D used Shawn Marion at the 4 spot in Phoenix in an undersized lineup. Chandler would fit in just fine if he is the 'Baby Matrix.'
 

portega1968

El Cacique
over and over? what?

i havent had run ins with anyone on here except for...well..you, clown


and you have an infatuation with nuts...willlld homo.


also,no dual personality dummy, i post under one name, and i just started posting here a month or so ago

dont think like an old fart, then you'll start saying words like...old...fart..

real quick,

1. dont use words or terms you dont know how to use or dont use in your daily life, you end up looking like a clown

2. dont bother trying to get other people involved in your temper tantrums,its only going to make you look like more of a clown.

3. dont keep saying stuff about nuts in every post, while i dont have a problem with it, im sure your father would be insulted that his son relates everything back to male genitalia. clown.


oh and no one has to respect you, you get respect by giving it. by throwing your baby fits, you're only proving your infancy bozo

thanks for the lecture GetRealistic
 

portega1968

El Cacique
You're such a tool.

I've noticed you constantly correct people on their grammar... so I took the liberty of adding that apostrophe for you son.

You knowz EddyCurrysCancer and you are the same IP, same poster... you created that alterego to have a different voice after getting owned 2 many times by 33 and metro. You use both names to give the impression of someone backing you up.

But you outed yourself. You said as GetRealistic that we previously had the "no homo" conversation before, but just so happens that conversation was with your alterego EddyCurrsCancer... you forgot that when you dissed me in this thread.

Then to further prove this, you jumped in as EddyCurrsCancer to backup GetRealistic without being provoked. You've unmasked yourself.

So, leave me alone and let me get go in peace... I have to get my Viagra prescription.

Next time, just defend Crawford with logic and not by making fun of my age.
 
wow, you figured it out


wait, no you didnt


you're making up a conspiracy in your head because you cant believe that someone posted on this board that hasnt been here for the past 2 or 3 years?

and because we both agree that you're a bozo, then we have to be the same ...person?


since you took the time, ill son you on your own grammar correcting

if you take a look back, at any of my posts since ive been here, you'll notice, my grammar is pretty on point, including "you're" and "your", so while you continue to correct the "other me" and play games in your own sad world, everyone else here will go on with the understanding that i dont share an ip with any board name here, you're speaking on ish you cant confirm and dont know (because its not true) and proving yourself to be more of a douche than previously self-reported

done with this, im not here to argue with old men who stay stuck on stupid, stupid.
 
Top