View Poll Results: Should Marbury Be Played?

Voters
26. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    22 84.62%
  • No

    4 15.38%
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 45 of 45

Thread: New York Knicks vs Milwaukee Bucks 11/02/08

  1. #31
    Superstar WiL8000's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    529
    Rep Power
    11

    Default

    I agree that Duhorn is not a starting point guard, he's a good backup or role player certainly. The damage is done though when it comes to Marbury.

  2. #32
    Veteran
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    7,192
    Rep Power
    20

    Default

    Every uptempo run n gun team strive to score 30 points each quarter.
    Their number one objective is to score before their oponets could get back on defense.

    The Bucks have a very poor defensive system plus they played last night, and the running Dantoni Knicks only averaged 21.5 points per quarter on the Bucks.

  3. #33
    The Gold Mac MSGKnickz33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    4,474
    Rep Power
    13

    Default

    good stat kiyaman

    if it wasnt for quentin richardson we would have lost by 30 points again

  4. #34
    Veteran JayJ44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Brooklyn
    Posts
    1,700
    Rep Power
    8

    Default

    Surprisingly, Q-Rich has played the best by far tonight. 28 points, made a lot of his 3's. Unsurprisingly, Duhon and Crawford played the worst by far. They combined for 7 points.

  5. #35
    Member D-Lee42fan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Denver,CO
    Posts
    228
    Rep Power
    8

    Nyk Logo

    A bad loss, to a not so great team. there was no offensive flow tonight. milwaukee came in and played a half court game and it took away from the knicks new run and gun style.

  6. #36
    Superstar WiL8000's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    529
    Rep Power
    11

    Default

    What an ugly game this was, I expected more c'mon this is the Bucks! Q-Rich had a decent game, as good as I've seen from him in a long time. This game really exposed a dire weakness the Knicks have.

    When they can't score and don't have a presence in the middle, they're in deep trouble. This is when not having Eddy Curry in shape and playing well really hurts the team. I would love him traded at this point as much as the next guy but the Knicks have no alternative besides James for a true center. I'd love for the guy to go on the Atkins diet and contribute.

  7. #37
    The King Akamu's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    720
    Rep Power
    7

    Default

    Nice avatar LOL, we need Lebron to get things poppin!

    When your team get's owned by the Bucks you die a little inside-

  8. #38
    Veteran jpz17's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    2,782
    Rep Power
    10

    Default

    well... man, I don't know, Duhon doesn't suck. Hes just not worth 5mil and not worth starting. Oh and Q did great today for once

  9. #39
    Superstar WiL8000's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    529
    Rep Power
    11

    Default

    Thanks for the big ups on the avatar Akamu. Duhorn doesn't suck I agree with the last comment, like I said this guy is a good reserve PG. Unfortunately we have a very talented PG in Marbury, but he's alienated this team so badly that they've decided to pay him to sit the pine. Hopefully we trade him for something worth while to help this team out.

  10. #40
    Veteran jpz17's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    2,782
    Rep Power
    10

    Default

    we shouldn't trade him. Hes 20mil off our cap next year

  11. #41
    Veteran JayJ44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Brooklyn
    Posts
    1,700
    Rep Power
    8

    Default

    Originally Posted by jpz17
    we shouldn't trade him. Hes 20mil off our cap next year
    Depends on what we can get for him. If some team at the trade deadline is looking to get better, they can panic and make a hasty trade. Maybe Denver is doing badly, they panic and trade AI. But we're not going to be able to trade him if we don't play him and show him off to other teams.

  12. #42
    Superstar WiL8000's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    529
    Rep Power
    11

    Default

    Having him sit on the bench though...what a waste. Yes the salary comes off the books after the season and that's good, but use him. Until he does something that warrants him to not to be in the lineup. Supposedly it was a clean slate for everyone, including Marbury. I would support this more if he was acting like he always has. Knowing the Knicks, they'll trade him, I'd be surprised if they keep him all season.

  13. #43
    12th man
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Far far away from the orgy that consist of clyde, 8's, rady, smokes and rono
    Posts
    11,260
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    We start the offense too much from the outside in.

    We need to attack the rim more and get more close range shots.

    Nash, Amare, and Marion are all close range players, thats why they have such high FG%.

    We don't have a Nash, Amare, and Chandler is the closest thing to Marion, and he's been taking too many jumpers for a guy of his attributes.

    Attack the rim more and get more close range shots for himself and his teammates

    Uhmm...I wonder who can do that.

  14. #44
    The Knicks are Back DaTPRiNCE's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Brooklyn N.Y.........Alexandria,Egypt in the blood
    Posts
    3,862
    Rep Power
    12

    Default

    we played horrible 2day we were shooting opps i mean chucking mad three point shots...chandler wasnt playing his game and settling for 3's on 2 many plays....it was evident that we need marburys experience and talent cause the bucks owned us on this night....looks like the drive for rubio/jennings has already started

    WE WANT MARBURY WE WANT MARBURY!!!

  15. #45
    Veteran Paul1355's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    East Coast
    Posts
    5,484
    Rep Power
    14

    Default

    Originally Posted by WiL8000
    What an ugly game this was, I expected more c'mon this is the Bucks! Q-Rich had a decent game, as good as I've seen from him in a long time. This game really exposed a dire weakness the Knicks have.

    When they can't score and don't have a presence in the middle, they're in deep trouble. This is when not having Eddy Curry in shape and playing well really hurts the team. I would love him traded at this point as much as the next guy but the Knicks have no alternative besides James for a true center. I'd love for the guy to go on the Atkins diet and contribute.
    He played very aggressive and used his wide and strong frame as to his advantage. If he does that he should be a decent bench player. I still think Chandler should start. I think with him always impressing and Q Rich always starting, is beginning to negatively effect Chandler. As soon as Q starts hitting shots, Chandler has a bad game going 3 for 13.

    Q's game today was a silent 28. He made shots when we were down by double figures and missed them when the game was close. And he missed A lot of big shots over and over again. He did play better and his aggressiveness was the key reason why.

Similar Threads

  1. the PO
    By 6thman in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: Jan 25, 2012, 21:10
  2. Farewell Marbury???
    By lanceroy in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 154
    Last Post: Jul 10, 2008, 19:22
  3. Utah Jazz vs New York Knicks Game Thread 1/30
    By MSGKnickz33 in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: Jan 31, 2008, 20:05
  4. Replies: 76
    Last Post: Jan 31, 2008, 19:05
  5. New York Knicks vs Charlotte Bobcats Game Thread 12/21
    By MSGKnickz33 in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: Dec 22, 2007, 22:58

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •