Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Should we include Lee

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    91
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Should we include Lee

    Been Doing a lot of thinking and I see why holding off on trading Zach was a good move. (As his stats get better we will get more in return.)

    The same does not apply for Eddy Curry. It is inevitable that Gallo and Chandler will be getting starting mins. As much as I love Lee, is he really a good enough shooter to play in D'Antoni system? I am starting to think we should include Lee with Curry in a package deal for Harrington. who knows maybe we can get a lottery protected 2010 first rounder also.

    What do you guys think?

  2. #2
    Lurker
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    4
    Rep Power
    0

    Default I like Lee

    I like Lee... i don't know if i like including him

  3. #3
    is the Bo$$ Toons's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Bahamas
    Posts
    2,379
    Rep Power
    12

    Default

    harrington says he is a all star player...
    he is begging for more minutes and he already plays 30+
    we dont need another head case.
    harrington is not the answer to our problems

    unless we get a first round pick in return,
    we dont need harrington.

    and for lee? no deal!

  4. #4
    Superstar richtree's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Dirty Jersey
    Posts
    513
    Rep Power
    6

    Default

    INCLUDE LEE IF WE MUST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


    LETS FACE IT ...IF WE HAD 2 BIG MEN THAT COULD REALLY PLAY...LEE WOULDN'T BE GETTING THAT MUCH TIME, OR NUMBERS/ ESPECIALLY REBOUNDS

  5. #5
    Superstar richtree's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Dirty Jersey
    Posts
    513
    Rep Power
    6

    Default

    sorry, had to let it be known...


    if lee went to play behind sammy D and Brand on sixers....

    he would avg...6pts ...7reb...2asst.....his real numbers...

  6. #6
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1,648
    Rep Power
    11

    Default

    i thought lee was a 5ft shooter... after 3 games thats giving him too much credit... if it aint a dunk.. he aint hitting it...

    and it rumored he wants 10+million.... i agree with richtree 6/7/2... are his real numbers... ship his ass out ... bring in fredic weis....

  7. #7
    Veteran JayJ44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Brooklyn
    Posts
    1,700
    Rep Power
    7

    Default

    I'm for trading Lee if we get something good for him. But we don't need a player who can cause chemistry problems.

  8. #8
    Superstar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    962
    Rep Power
    8

    Default

    I agree. Lee will have artificially inflated stats this year for the Knicks due to this offense (if they actually did the 7 seconds or less...stupid Crawf+ Duhon) but every team has a David Lee type player (Tho Lee is better than most of them). Udonis Haslem for example.

    Lee cannot block shots, and his D still isn't all that. Even with his improvement, cuz he can hit the open jay now, i still don't say hold on to this dude if you can find a good deal that makes sense salary cap wise.

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    91
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    I don't think Harrington is going to bring chemistry problems. We all ready have no chemistry and this team is not very good. But if we do trade curry we get rid of $$. Harrington contract is up after this year.

Similar Threads

  1. One of the few post ima post this season
    By Kennedy Curse in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: Mar 21, 2008, 13:12
  2. Replies: 8
    Last Post: Mar 31, 2004, 15:10

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •