I think most teams would take Eddy Curry's contract if they could move up from the 2nd round to the 8th pick in the draft. Curry is only guaranteed for 2 more seasons. So if another team can trade a contract that expires in 2010 for Curry who expires in 2011 and a lottery pick, im sure they would jump at that opportunity.
I think its the Knicks who shouldn't give up their pick just to get rid of Eddy Curry's contract. If they do trade down, they should be getting 2 mid-late round 1st round picks, not a 2nd. Thats why I suggested earlier that Minnesota might be an option with their #18 and #28.
Not too hyped about that.
I wanna stand still...we may not keep the 8th, look at Chicago who was the 9th pik getting # 1.
I want Rubio if we get lucky.
If we're stuck at eight, I want Lawson.
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]Roy Williams, who was in New York Thursday night attending the annual Winged Foot Dinner at the New York Athletic Club said that if the Knicks want to draft a point guard in June's NBA Draft, the only place to look is North Carolina floor general Ty Lawson.
"If you want to run, there is no one better," Williams told me. "In a halfcourt system, Ty wouldn't be as effective but if you want to run the way the Knicks want to, there is no better fit than Ty. He's going to get people easy baskets and and he's going to push like one else can."
Lawson also developed his 3-point game this past season, shooting an impressive 47% from behind the line, something that's a major necessity if you're going to play for Mike D'Antoni.
I've felt all year long that there were major similarities between Lawson and the Bobcats' Raymond Felton but Williams saw it differently.
"Raymond might play through pain a little bit more than Ty throughout an 82 game season," Williams said. "Ty is a much better shooter and a bit quicker. Raymond also knows how to bull his way to the basket more and grind things out. They're similar but they're not identicial."
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]I'm hearing Lawson is already scheduling a predraft workout with the Knicks.
Last edited by JayJ44; May 08, 2009 at 19:46.
What do you guys think of Jordan Hill? He hasn't been talked about at all over here and I think there is a definite possibility of him slipping to #8. Every mock drafts I see have him in the #4-#6 area, but I don't see how that will hold up. He is still very raw and all projection at this point.
The only team I see him as a better fit than us is Memphis, but who knows what they will do. They may go PG to compete with Conley.
Any thoughts or projections on him? Draft express has him as a best case - better rebounding Chris Wilcox...That doesn't sound all that impressive. He has all the physical tools, and good speed. Sounds like someone that can excel under D'Antoni.
What do you guys think? He is the only PF/C I think I would take at #8 if he was there.
Looking over the numbers of our top power forwards, we noticed a number of players who are projected as lottery picks that don’t look the part on paper. Sitting just behind Griffin in our rankings, we find [Only registered and activated users can see links. ], who’s overall Points Per Possession of.94 places him slightly below the mean of .98, not quite what one would expect from a potential top-5 draft pick. Looking deeper, we realize that Hill ranks right around the average in a number of areas. He surprisingly connects on just 63.87% of his finishing opportunities not including post ups, and only scores on 49.6% of his logged possessions –sitting just off the mean in both categories. Much of Hill’s lack of efficiency can be attributed to the fact that he only gets fouled on 10.4% of his possessions and gets very few touches in transition (16th at 1.1 Pos/g) and basket cut situations (15th at 1.8), two scenarios where he’s effective ( 1.33 and 1.43 PPP respectively). The other factor working against Hill is his jumper, which we’ll discuss later.[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]On the other hand, Hill’s poor skill-level was very much evident in this game, as he looked very raw and mechanical trying to post up Cleveland State’s undersized defenders in the post, being stripped on one possession and also throwing up some ugly looking bricks. You would have expected him to dominate this game considering the huge advantage he holds in terms of size/athleticism against the 6-5 and 6-6 big men he went up against, but he really wasn’t able to consistently take advantage of his natural gifts. Defensively, Hill has potential but clearly is lacking in the fundamentals department, having a hard time rotating over effectively to guard the paint and picking up some questionable fouls. His basketball IQ is clearly nothing to write home about, and unless he’s able to significantly improve his skill-level over the next few years (not out of the question considering how far he’s come), he looks a lot more likely to develop into a solid energy guy/role-player rather than the game-changing presence you might expect from a potential top-5 pick. With that in mind, the fact that his rebounding rate has fallen significantly recently, going from over averaging over 12 boards per contest in the first 20 games, to just 9.3 rebounds in last 12 games, is not a great sign.
We need someone who can come in and contribute right away. Hill is a project, and is very overrated IMO. He's getting drafted mainly on his athletic ability, which isn't usually a good sign. I honestly don't think he's worth a lottery pick, especially a top 10.
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]We took our time in crunching the numbers of this year’s point guard crop, since it should prove to be the deepest and most talented position throughout the draft process. It also provides the most unique story lines, with the likes of [Only registered and activated users can see links. ], [Only registered and activated users can see links. ], [Only registered and activated users can see links. ], and [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] vying for position, with each featuring a completely different playing style.
As we’ve done in each of our four previous pieces, we’ll be utilizing Synergy [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] Technology’s Quantified Player Reports to see how this year’s point guards stack up against one another from a situational perspective.
Unlike the other positions we’ve evaluated, this group is headlined by two international players and has a dearth of underclassmen that would be ranked closer to the top of our rankings in many other seasons. Considering our current mock draft has 6 point guards going in the lottery and has 11 slated to go in the first round, it isn’t difficult to see why <nobr id="itxt_nobr_6_0" style="font-weight: normal; font-size: 100%;">NBA</nobr> teams searching for lead guards are looking forward to draft day and doing their homework on these prospects. With that said, we’ll do our best to paint a full picture of what each player can bring to the table moving forward.
There is a bigger disparity in the roles point guard prospects play than exists at any other position.
Looking over the 24 prospects we have on our list, there is such a vast stylistic gap from one player to the next that it isn’t difficult to infer just how differently point guards are used in the array of systems these prospects honed their crafts in. From an NCAA perspective, the spectrum of roles range from big combo guards like freshman [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] and [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] who did as much scoring as they did passing, to guys like [Only registered and activated users can see links. ], [Only registered and activated users can see links. ], and [Only registered and activated users can see links. ], who were relied on almost exclusively to carry their teams to victory, to hardnosed defenders to Tony Douglas, to facilitators from elite programs like [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] and [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]. That range doesn’t even take into consideration the five international guards on our list, or the lower level prospects who weren’t necessary standouts.
There may be no better example of how many different roles point guards fill than the gap between our top two PGs. [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] and [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] both saw major action in the Euroleague, but have little in common outside of that. Rubio was a creative playmaker that stood out while running the show almost exclusively in a leading role for DKV Joventut, while Jennings was essentially a spark plug off the bench for Lottomatica, asked to do very little, but still managing to show off awesome athleticism and ability in the open floor. Clearly, this group features a lot of unique talents, and that requires teams to do their homework more than other positions do.
• [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] looks as good as anyone from this perspective, regardless of position.
As we put this data together, we weren’t surprised that [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] excelled from a situational perspective, as he did play for the most potent offense in all of college [Only registered and activated users can see links. ], but we didn’t expect him to look this good. He ranks first in a number of key categories, including overall FG% (52%), Points Per Possession [PPP](1.13), pull up jump shot FG% (47%), and %shots he was fouled on (16.1%). Though his teammates did a lot of scoring as well, Lawson functioned seamlessly as a complementary scorer. Looking past his efficiency as a shooter off the dribble, he was second in catch and shoot field goal percentage at 48%. From a purely statistical sense, no player on this list scored more efficiently than Lawson.
We thought that UNC’s transition offense might have given Lawson a decided advantage over some of his counterparts in terms of efficiency, but that wasn’t entirely true. He did get 10% more offense in transition than any of the other players we looked at (an outrageous 38.6%), but his transition PPP of 1.2 is the same as his PPP in spot up situations and not as far above the average as his PPP in pick and roll situations (1.19 PPP, +.29) or on isolations (1 PPP, +.16). Lawson was an incredibly prolific transition player (which is quite an advantage in itself today’s NBA), but he was comparatively better in other areas as well. When you consider that he only turned the ball over on 13.8% of his half court possessions (5th best) and can drive left and right equally well, it seems like Lawson could be an excellent offensive fit on virtually any team, regardless of tempo.
• [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] doesn’t have overwhelming stats, but he’s the youngest prospect on our list playing against by far the strongest competition, and thus isn’t as weak in some areas as people may imagine.
Considering his frail frame, lack of awesome leaping ability, and level of competition, it would be fairly reasonable to expect Rubio to struggle around the basket. Even though European prospects (and veterans for that matter) tend to have a lower PPP than their NCAA and NBA counterparts, Rubio actually falls right around the average of this group as a finisher at 1.11 PPP. His ability to transition that part of his game to the NBA is going to be very important when you consider that he takes under 2.5 jump shots per game, has made only 5 of his 25 logged pull up jumpers, and is still gaining confidence in his improved catch and shoot ability (1.1 Pos/G, 41%, 9/22).
Always better known for his creativity and playmaking ability, it doesn’t come as a shock that Rubio looks good in transition. He is shooting 69% on his transition opportunities on just 13 attempts this season –which is a bit misleading since he doesn’t take many attempts more because he knows when to give the ball up than because he isn’t pushing the tempo. In contrast, his limited isolation possessions are indicative of some issues, as he’s not going to produce a ton in pure one-on-one situations. Fortunately, Rubio, like most European point guard’s we’ve evaluated, is effective on the pick and roll. With 27% of his touches coming from the two-man game, Rubio could have a mutually beneficial relationship with the post players he is teamed with in the NBA, since they’ll likely make his life just as easy as he’ll make theirs.
Obviously our sample size is a bit limited for two reasons: Rubio simply doesn’t use that many possessions as a scorer (9 Pos/G), and he missed a good portion of the season with a wrist injury. We were on hand for one of his first games back in December, and while he’s shaken off some of the rust as the season has continued, his wrist is still limiting his production, but not to the extent that it was initially. Evidence for that can be found in the observation that Rubio drives left nearly 74% of the time he looked to go to the rim, the most of any player on this list by over 5%. His injury is also partially accountable for the fact that he turned the ball over on 28.5% (1st) of his halfcourt possessions. The team that drafts will need to make sure that they get him back on the right track as a shooter and help open up the floor to get him back in the swing of things to make up for all the time he lost this season.
• AAU basketball and high-level European basketball are worlds apart. [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] got to experience the difference first hand and it shows in his numbers.
Jennings has the second lowest usage on this list at 7.6 Pos/G, and his .77 PPP is the worst. The rigors of international basketball aren’t kind to the average eighteen year old, and considering he threw himself to the wolves in signing with a team playing on the highest levels in Lottomatica Roma, he struggled as expected. His athleticism let him make some plays from time to time, but his inexperience was constantly apparent in his shot selection. He took 2.1 pull up jumpers per game, but only hit 21% of them. He shot under 25% from the field when running the pick and roll and when isolated as well. The fact that he was fouled on merely 6.2% of his halfcourt shots didn’t help his PPP in those areas either. Jennings was at his best in spot up situations, but his 1.07 PPP is still only a bit above average –though he did put up 1.39 PPP on open catch and shoot jumpers. News isn’t all bad for Jennings, as he turned the ball over less than average (15.2% of halfcourt Pos), but at the end of the day, he scored on merely 29.7% of his possessions. Jennings’ struggles may make any point guard considering the jump from high school to the top level of Europe think twice, as it’s likely just too big a jump in competition to overcome in a minimal role in a single season.
• [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] has the scoring tools to be productive, but needs to improve his perimeter <nobr id="itxt_nobr_33_0" style="font-weight: normal; font-size: 100%;">arsenal</nobr> to be efficient.
Evans was the top player on our list in possessions used per game as a finisher at 8.8, and his PPP of 1.14 lands him a bit above average. Unfortunately, his overall PPP was .88, which lands him slightly below average and exposes the biggest weakness in his offensive game: his jump shot. His PPP in open catch and shoot situations was a paltry .86. Couple that with only .69 PPP on jump shots off the dribble, and it becomes abundantly obvious that Evans is far from a complete package offensively. His PPP of .54 on isolations is a bit disconcerting as well, but it shows that he’s opportunistic enough to find his way to the rim in other situations, while also displaying his tendency to force the issue in one on one opportunities. Getting fouled at an average rate and not being too turnover prone, whichever team drafts Evans needs to take the time to develop his jumper to help the transition of his dribble-drive game to the NBA.
• [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] had little opportunity to be efficient, since he was doing enough shooting for three people at Davidson.
Curry’s 31.9 possessions per game is highest usage of any player in the draft this season. Its 50% higher than any other point guard not named [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]. With that in mind, it is important to take his average .94 PPP with a grain of salt, since it is representative of the load he carried and not the role he will play in the NBA. Curry took 5.4 catch and shoot jumpers per game, and his 1.15 PPP with a hand in his face and 1.33 PPP when left open both land him well above average. In terms of his shooting off the dribble, Curry took 11.6 pulls up jumpers per game, more shots than some players took in total.
Projecting him to the next level, Curry is an interesting case. He’s likely to do a lot of his damage in spot up situations in the NBA, but got only 8.9% of his possessions off of spot ups last seasons. He’s not likely to use a lot of one-on-one possessions, but he used 8.6 per game last season (1st). Averaging 8.3 isolations per game (68.3% Left), Curry probably won’t sniff half that number next season. In terms of guard play, his 41% shooting in transition ranks second to last, showing how hard he was pressing to score, but his 1.3 PPP on the pick and roll is excellent—which leaves a lot of room for optimism. He did use 2.6 possessions per game as a jump shooter running off of screens, so he does have a nice base of experience there, but it is notable how far apart Curry’s role in the NCAA was from the role he is likely to play in the NBA.
• [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] didn’t stand out in any one area, but he’s similar to [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] in how he needs to develop a jumper to complement his finishing ability.
Not super efficient overall (.86 PPP), Holiday has the lowest usage of any NCAA player on our list at 9.7 possessions per game. He played a small role on a very slow-paced team, which he’ll like to tell you all about if his recent interviews are any indication. He got about a third of those possessions as a finisher at the rim, where he posted a PPP of 1.2 that places him well above average. He scored 1.34 PPP in transition on limited touches in UCLA’s system, but showed that he can get to the rim and make plays in the open floor.
Unfortunately, the good news ends there for the most part. Holiday shot only 28% from the field on his catch and shoot jumpers, landing him second to last, and his .75 PPP on pull up jumpers leaves a lot to be desired as well. His inordinately large percentage of possessions coming from spot up shots (27.8%) indicates that he spent heavy minutes off the ball –usually when [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] was on the floor. Couple that with his questionable jump shot and you have a clear-cut recipe for disaster, which is exactly how he’d likely describe his first (and likely last) season in the NCAA.
• [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] was fast enough to compensate for his size on the NCAA level.
Flynn was a standout in two areas: his ability to get to the rim, and his one-on-one skills. Thankfully for him, those are two skills that the NBA values dearly. Clearly, his productivity is grounded in his first step. Flynn got to the rim 8.8 times per game, which accounted for a lot of his scoring, but his 1.24 PPP in unguarded catch and shoot situations and .94 PPP on pull up jumpers are both very respectable. His 4.3 possessions per game on isolations are amongst the best amongst big-conference players, and his 41% shooting on those plays isn’t awful. Couple those tools with his capacity to drive in both directions and his ability to draw fouls (16.1% SF), and it becomes hard not to think that Flynn could be, at the very least, a high quality backup if he improves his efficiency, especially once he masters the pick and roll (.84 PPP).
• [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] looks like an awesome backup point guard.
Collison ranked third in overall FG% at 50% and his PPP of 1.02 lands him well above average. The second best finisher in our group at 1.26 PPP and very capable shooting off the dribble (.99 PPP), Collison can score in one-on-one situations (1.02 PPP) and utilize the pick and roll (1.14 PPP) to get his shot off. Able to score at a high rate when he puts the ball on the floor, Collison could still stand to improve his catch and shoot ability, but could be a great backup point guard in the NBA since he doesn’t seem to force anything and his offensive tools are conducive to success in most situations. The question now is whether he can translate that to a higher level of competition.
• [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] falls somewhere in between [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] and [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] in terms of his numbers, as he was a very high usage point guard, but still was able to remain fairly efficient—which is a very good sign. His 21.2 possessions per game place him 3rd in that category, but his overall PPP of .99 ranks a very respectable 6th. Maynor’s best quality appears to be his short range game, he got to the rim 8 times per game and posted a PPP of 1.12 as a finisher. That’s slightly above average, but few players on this list utilize the same mix of floaters and scoops that Maynor does, and those types of shots have a much greater degree of difficulty than the average layup. Maynor didn’t fall below the average in nearly any category, usually hovering around the middle of the pack, and his isolation PPP of 1.01 stood out amongst this group. The team that drafts Maynor will be getting a player that obviously knows his limitations and can play a number of roles well, but might not stand out in any one area immediately.
• [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] was the second best finisher on our list, posting 1.26 PPP around the basket. For player who is often knocked for his lack of strength and athleticism, Calathes more than compensated for any shortcomings in this area last season. He did turn the ball over on 19% of his used possessions, but he was also one of the better spot up players on our list (1.17 PPP). That should help him in the NBA since he won’t be asked to do as much playmaking in the lane, but will be able to initiate the offense and still contribute.
• [Only registered and activated users can see links. ], was one of the most efficient players on our list, using over 20 possessions per game (20.7). His overall PPP of 1.04 was the second best of all players, while his PPP as a finisher of 1.22 was sixth best. As a jump shooter, he scored 1.41 PPP on unguarded catch and shoot attempts, and 1 PPP on pull ups. A gifted off the ball player who scores 1.23 PPP (5th) shooting off of screens and 1.14 PPP in spot up situations, Douglas is only an average shot creator (.85 Isolation PPP), but he doesn’t turn the ball over in the half court almost at all (9.7%, 2nd), has experience running the pick and roll (5.3 Pos/G, 2nd), is an excellent defender, and seems like an ideal complement to a taller ball-handling guard. His stock has risen in recent months, and will be interesting to how his limitations as a distributor (he ranks dead last in amongst all passing metrics amongst draft-eligible PGs) factor in to where he’s selected on draft day.
• [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] had the lowest logged shooting percentage at 36%, and the fact that he took 3.3 contested looks from the outside per game (1st) may have played a role in that. All the three pointers Mills attempted certainly didn’t help his efficiency on the college level. For as fast as Mills is, he got to the rim at an average rate and really struggled to convert once there. He also ranked last for the percentage of possessions he was fouled on—just 5%.
• Real Madrid point guard [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]’s 1.81 PPP on unguarded catch and shoot attempts rank first in our database and are representative of what he can bring to the table once he gives the ball up. He wasn’t great on the pick and roll (.88 PPP) and doesn’t get to the rim much (2.7 Pos/G, last), but when he can set up in the corner, he’s a dynamite spot up player (1.31 PPP).
• [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] was Tennessee Martin’s go-to-guy and then some, using 28 possessions per game. While there isn’t a lot of video on him right now, he’s a known commodity after declaring for the draft last season. His play over the next few months will be exponentially more important to his stock that what he accomplished this season.
• [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] came on extremely strong for Cholet in the last couple months, but more than any player on this list, the sample size of what we’re looking at doesn’t offer much. His logged games were easily his best, so it doesn’t paint the most accurate picture of his body of work, but his ability to get to the rim (22/32, 69%) is an accurate representation of his overall quickness. His teammate, [Only registered and activated users can see links. ], is the loser in this case, since his good games didn’t always coincide with Beaubois’.
• Duquesne’s [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] tied [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] for the best logged shooting percentage on our list at 52%, thanks in large part to his 64% shooting in 8.7 possessions per game as a finisher. His jumper leaves a lot to be desired at this point (1.6 catch and shoot jumpers per game), but he’s a guy with a couple tools and clearly defined weaknesses that he could work out over time.
nice post JayJ, i hope we land Lawson and we make a trade for T.Chandler somewhere in the offseason.
but when it comes to this draft looking realistically if we could land Lawson,Holiday or Jennings i'd be very physicked
Thanks Prince. Holiday intrigues me. He's an excellent defender. He's underrated right now, if we end up trading down, he could be a steal.
i see holiday moving up if anything. he's projected around late lottery by the time the draft is here he'll be around 8 where we're picking if not higher.
the more i look at this draft the more it looks like Lawson or Jennings will be our pick they just seem destined to be knicks ( well one of them)
Theres a lot of good guards in this draft.
I'm just not sold by Jennings yet. If he really cares about his skills, he would stay another year in Europe and prove himself. He'll be throwing himself into the pack of wolves again by making another big jump to another league without being proven.
Theres no doubt his ability is ELITE in the world, but he hasn't shown he could lead a team or put them on his back, or even produce in a professional league yet.
I just don't feel its good to take the risk, even though I could see why people are intrigued by Jennings due to his Tony Parker quickness, and Tim Hardaway type handles.
if Brandon Jennings is available at the spot we pick on, I say yes. He can be like a Chris Paul-type player. We need a point guard.
That's what confuses me..a year ago was there that much difference between the hype of Jrue Holliday and Brandon Jennings? Neither showed much this season, yet Jenning's stock stayed up and Holliday's fell down to mid-late 1st round. Explain that..its almost like Jennings gets a pass because he was playing in a league he wasn't ready for.
how bout jeff teague??didnt he enter the draft???he looked real good from what i saw this past season