would you consider trading the 2009 1st round pick in a deal with Curry and Jefferies if that was the only way to get rid of both without giving up Lee + Robinson? How valuable is that pick to the team anyway over Lee/Robinson? If trading 1 of the 1st round pick/Robinson/Lee is the only way to assure 2 FA signings in 2010 by getting rid of both Curry and Jefferies, I think I would rather give up the pick.
I have to admit I am still new at learning the salary cap/trading rules in basketball..but would the team be better 2010+ with Robinson + Lee + 2 FA signings? As opposed to Robinson + Lee + 1st round pick + 1 FA signing because Curry is still on the team.
Still not sure what is acceptable as a realistic deal in the NBA..have never been a big basketball fan..but like the style of the knicks now.
Like what if Toronto did Jermaine O'Neal + whatever garbage..Will Solomon + Hassaan Adams (22.7 mil) for 1st round pick 2009, Curry + Jefferies + Rose (23.3 mil)..maybe they throw in a 1st round pick in a few years when the knicks are actually good and hopefully won't have a lottery pick for a long time.
2010 would have
2 FA signing
Add a PG - Duhon probably stays..maybe add Nash whatever
Again the point of this is if it is possible to get rid of Curry + Jefferies without getting rid of Lee/Robinson..If it isn't would you rather give up the pick than Lee/Robinson to go along with Curry Jefferies.