Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 39

Thread: The Official Thread: Jamaal Crawford For Al Harrington

  1. #1
    is the Bo$$ Toons's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Bahamas
    Posts
    2,379
    Rep Power
    13

    Default The Official Thread: Jamaal Crawford For Al Harrington

    Your Thoughts?

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    163
    Rep Power
    7

    Default

    what is this like the 80th thread on this trade?

    my only thoughts is that you need to revise your avatar.

  3. #3
    Member JRG3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    74
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG i cant believe we would trade crawford away... harrington sucks and has mental problems...he suffers from a disease that makes him believe hes better than what he is

  4. #4
    Member Knicker23's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    CT 203
    Posts
    430
    Rep Power
    7

    Default

    I don't know enough about Harrington to make a good judgment...but it seems like moving crawford out is like taking the one player, besides z, who we look to for certain plays and stuff..i mean comon Qrich? the guy's got stronger but he still ain't nothing special as far as i'm concerned..nate is good but he's still young..duhon? good D i guess.. Crawford took some wild shots but his 3 point play has been pretty good lately, i'm not sure i understand why they'd trade him for Harrington. but i'm hopefull. new faces are always good

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    163
    Rep Power
    7

    Default

    Originally Posted by JRG3
    he suffers from a disease that makes him believe hes better than what he is
    he's already made a best friend on the Knicks with Marbury then.

  6. #6
    is the Bo$$ Toons's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Bahamas
    Posts
    2,379
    Rep Power
    13

    Default

    This is a good move by walsh once again. It really sux that we lose a good ofensive weapon. Crawford would have accepted any role on the team, he is definitely 6th MOY material. I like this move because it agrees with our 2010 plan. I wish we could have gotten bellinelli out of the deal as well, but i guess gs would have wanted expirings (which we want to keep). Harrington is overraetd, and has to prove himself the knick fans (not an easy task). Walsh maintained his patience, and allowed crawfords trade value to rise, and then he traded him. I feel that randolph is next.

  7. #7
    Member Knicker23's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    CT 203
    Posts
    430
    Rep Power
    7

    Default

    Crawford is clearly a better scorer...i mean do the knicks think there going to be bettered so much by harringtons defense that it will make up for the points they'll be missing with crawford? i don't want to jump to conclusions on how harrington will be, if he's like Z we'll do well, but the numbers when comparing Harrington and Craw speak for themselves...

    i don't think this is anything more then the knicks wanting to get rid of another contract....we better be getting LJ with all these people were getting rid of

    Originally Posted by Toons
    I feel that randolph is next.
    I don't get it. at what point do you stop getting players to make them good so they could be traded? I don't understand why we feel the need to trade our players once that get reasonably good. I mean the knicks don't have a go to guy right now...who are you going to go to for the three when were down 2 with 8 seconds left?? you gona let Qrich throw some shot up? Nate?? i don't get it

  8. #8
    Veteran Starks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Bronx
    Posts
    1,472
    Rep Power
    12

    Default

    This move is fine by me. The gameplan is to get under the cap for the big LeBron offseason, so this measures up.

    The Knicks don't have a problem scoring, so I dont think losing Jamal is that big of an issue, but the Knicks have depended on him when he's hot for such a long time that it will be intersting to see who they rely on in crunch time.

    Nate Robinson's stats are going to explode now that he is starting. If you have a fantasy team, pick him up right now

  9. #9
    Veteran Starks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Bronx
    Posts
    1,472
    Rep Power
    12

    Default

    theres another trade on the way it seems. Soemthing with the Clippers. The Knicks just activated Marbury so that they don't get fined for not having enough players dressed.

  10. #10
    Veteran LJ4ptplay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Ft. Collins, CO
    Posts
    2,950
    Rep Power
    12

    Default


  11. #11
    Superstar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    683
    Rep Power
    11

    Default Crawford Gone

    If Crawford is indeed gone for Harrington, it proves that Walsh is dead serious about getting under the cap for 2010.
    If he traded Crawford for Harrington, I fully expect he will trade Z-Bo for almost anything that will get him under the cap in 2010. Crawford's 2010 contract is about $7M less than Z-Bo's.

    This is not about making the team better this year.

  12. #12
    The Knicks are Back DaTPRiNCE's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Brooklyn N.Y.........Alexandria,Egypt in the blood
    Posts
    3,862
    Rep Power
    12

    Default

    Z-Bo is rumored to go to Dallas...damn i wish they still had Harris....i want Bass and a good player from them i dont know thier team that well

    [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

  13. #13
    Member DANUTZ39's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    451
    Rep Power
    7

    Default

    If Nate will be our starting sg I dont think we lost anything.
    Nate is a better (younger too)player then J C and now that he will start and he s minutes increase so should his stats.
    So anytime you shed so much salary witch will be esential in 2 years, have same or better option at that position and get Al Harington in the process
    you just made a pretty good trade

    GOOD MOVE WALSH

  14. #14
    Superstar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    962
    Rep Power
    8

    Default

    This helps my fantasy team immensely. I have nate and chandler.

    I honestly think if we get rid of zach we will be worse (where is the scoring gonna come from). But, it certainly means we are landing a big free agent in 10

  15. #15
    Member Knicker23's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    CT 203
    Posts
    430
    Rep Power
    7

    Default

    if we get rid of Z we'll have no one to look to to score on a basis...zip

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 50
    Last Post: Nov 24, 2008, 20:35
  2. The Official Crawford Sucks Thread
    By MSGKnickz33 in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 240
    Last Post: Nov 21, 2008, 17:32
  3. Too many SF!!!!
    By nyk_nyk in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 71
    Last Post: Jul 24, 2008, 20:14
  4. Replies: 20
    Last Post: Jul 01, 2008, 02:31
  5. Crawford?
    By chaos147 in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 74
    Last Post: Feb 26, 2008, 19:45

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •