View Poll Results: With Randolph and Crawford gone, who's going to lead the Knicks in scoring?

Voters
30. You may not vote on this poll
  • Al Harrington

    13 43.33%
  • Nate Robinson

    11 36.67%
  • Cuttino Mobley

    3 10.00%
  • Tim Thomas

    0 0%
  • Quentin Richardson

    3 10.00%
  • Chris Duhon

    0 0%
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 51

Thread: With Crawford and Randolph gone, who will lead the Knicks in scoring?

  1. #31
    Member DANUTZ39's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    451
    Rep Power
    7

    Default

    Originally Posted by jswinder
    Hahahahaha

    I'm a Warriors fan and have been one for years. I feel very sorry for all of you Knicks fans who think Al is going to be your top scorer, let alone a better defender than Jamal Crawford. Be prepared for a player who will shoot you out of games with poor shot selection, (check his FG%'s) never boxes out his man on the boards(just like Curry), perimeter defense forget about it, is an embarrassing finisher, constantly misses defensive assignments, can't shoot free throws, can't take criticsm, and is one of the most overrated players in the NBA due to the 07 playoffs and the prior 6th man award.

    His back was never hurt, he was just too much of a prima donna to play under pressure after being called out as the role player he should be. Sound familiar??? Haha. Crawford is twice the scorer Al is, and his weak defense is something I can live with because we've got excellent young shot blockers to help him out. I wish I could say I feel sorry for you guys, but if you were a Warrior fan like I've been over the last 15 years, it's hard to sympathize with anybody...especially Knicks fans.

    I find it hard to believe how much stock you guys are actually putting into landing LeBron. Why would he want to come to such a joke of a team and play under such a tumultuous front office? Why would he do that? The Cav's are winning now, and LeBron's from Akron. I think you Knick fans just have to deal with the fact that LeBron's not your guy, and that Jamal was just about to flourish under D'Antoni. Yes, I'll take his 20 and 6 apg, thanks. Ya'll just been fleeced. THANK YOU!
    You are just a sorry dude who went out of his way (registered)just so you can post your very deep knowledge on this trade.
    You say that jamal is a better defender than harrington.WTF are u talking about, jamal can't defend his shadow let alone other players but i guess you sorry gs fans will see.
    About scoring you just wait and see. jamal scored on this theam only when he was the main option and took half of the team shots in the process.Wait till he s gonna start hoisting some of his ''what he was thinking'' shots. He's not gonna be your first scoring option (see jackson) or second when monta comes back (if he ever will).You will be lucky if he will get 12-13ppg out of him. And since you tell us to check AL FG% you better check JC and let us know what you see. AL carrer fg% .450, 3p% .359 and JC fg%.403, 3p%.358
    and jamal is a shooting guard(pathetic). I mean JC is a good locker room guy and decent player(still no defence) but dont think you got Ray Allen or some
    M. Reed. By the way jamal just scored 9 points for your team tonight in 29 minutes as starter. enough said.
    Then when you talk about the knicks you look even more stupid(saying that on this site) and I cant even lower myself to your level. Go back and be a sorry azz GS fan(for another 15years) and leave this site alone. I ussualy dont use insulting words but you deserve some for sure. So get the fk out of here.

    PS. How pathetic is that abcd agreed with this smuck( just because walsh did not made a trade to please him) that only came here to make fun of our team.

  2. #32
    Veteran TunerAddict's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    2,183
    Rep Power
    9

    Default

    Originally Posted by DANUTZ39
    PS. How pathetic is that abcd agreed with this smuck( just because walsh did not made a trade to please him) that only came here to make fun of our team.
    Dude, he wants our team to fail. What do you expect him to say?

  3. #33
    Moderator
    CoolClyde's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Bronx
    Posts
    2,479
    Rep Power
    20

    Default Ouch

    Originally Posted by jswinder
    Hahahahaha
    I'm a Warriors fan and have been one for years. I feel very sorry for all of you Knicks fans who think Al is going to be your top scorer, let alone a better defender than Jamal Crawford. Be prepared for a player who will shoot you out of games with poor shot selection, (check his FG%'s) never boxes out his man on the boards(just like Curry), perimeter defense forget about it, is an embarrassing finisher, constantly misses defensive assignments, can't shoot free throws, can't take criticsm, and is one of the most overrated players in the NBA due to the 07 playoffs and the prior 6th man award...
    Ya'll just been fleeced. THANK YOU!

    Damn you laughing boy! Harrington sounds like a po' ZBo... that sucks. thanks alot, Golden State A-hole! New high scorer will be Harrington, N8 or Chandler, depending on minutes. With Crawfish and Z-Bo gone (half the offense, half the shots) who will be starters? When/if Mobley, Jeffries and Galinari get going, everyone's minutes will go down... who will the 8-9 man rotation be 2 months from now? This is the key to the high scorer question...

    Overall, I think Chandler will bust out this season, get the most minutes, and be high scorer, but I would love N8 to prove me wrong.
    Chandler>Harrington
    Chandler>/= N8

  4. #34
    Superstar dre48ny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    681
    Rep Power
    7

    Default

    Lee's scoring will increase, which is key. Robinson will lead the team in scoring.

  5. #35
    Veteran OriginalKnickGrandson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    N.Y.
    Posts
    1,116
    Rep Power
    9

    Default

    Originally Posted by TunerAddict
    Dude, he wants our team to fail. What do you expect him to say?


    I'm sorry TurnerAddict, I agree with them. I stated on the Curry for Harrinton trade thred that Harrington is another Z-Bo (of 07-08) Harrinton has more athletic ability than Z-Bo , but dosen't rebound? Harrington is a chucher like Jamal and Z-Bo except Z-Bo and Crawford are better shooters (beleive it or not) He is a ball hog, demonstrated in his first game here. He plays little to no defense and has no post game. I'm just glad that his contract is up before 2010.

    Tim Thomas> Al Harrinton

  6. #36
    Superstar WiL8000's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    529
    Rep Power
    11

    Default

    These recent trades hurt the Knicks for the moment, thats obvious. Once they mesh, which will take a few weeks at least, they'll play a little more competitively I think. There's still a lot of other possibilities in other trades the Knicks will probably make before the trading deadline. The top scorer in my opinion will be Chandler, followed by Nate.

    Somehow they've got to trade Eddy Curry's contract, but with his value down like it is we may get some garbage thrown at us. I'm actually hoping he plays a little to get the ball rolling on moving him. I hope we don't have to include someone like David Lee to do it, but that's probably the case.

  7. #37
    Veteran TunerAddict's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    2,183
    Rep Power
    9

    Default

    Originally Posted by OriginalKnickGrandson
    I'm sorry TurnerAddict, I agree with them. I stated on the Curry for Harrinton trade thred that Harrington is another Z-Bo (of 07-08) Harrinton has more athletic ability than Z-Bo , but dosen't rebound? Harrington is a chucher like Jamal and Z-Bo except Z-Bo and Crawford are better shooters (beleive it or not) He is a ball hog, demonstrated in his first game here. He plays little to no defense and has no post game. I'm just glad that his contract is up before 2010.

    Tim Thomas> Al Harrinton
    No problem man. Its your right to disagree. Donnie and Dantoni both said that they felt this is actually a better team now and I believe them. Even if the talent we received is less than what we gave away, we may see a more unified team, a smarter team, and bigger roles from players who weren't able to shine like they may be able too with crawford and ZBO in their way. This may free people like DLee, Chandler, or Nate to take that next step and become greater than they were before.

    Best team isn't always about talent or how good they are on paper. We've been proving that for years the wrong way. Time we showed it goes both ways.

  8. #38
    Enlightened OGKnickfan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    944
    Rep Power
    7

    Default

    Where's Chandler? He should be on this poll, since he's averaging almost 16 a game, at the moment . Anyway, I say Chandler becomes leading scorer. As for the G-State fan, what can I say? I never wanted Crawford and Zach to be traded. I thought, with Curry benched, we really had a chance to get a playoff seed.

    As things are, we'll be lucky to finish 10th in the East. I don't believe Lebron is the end-all, either. We don't need Lebron to be a good team, we just need a solid big man, some solid role players, who can pass, box out, and play D, and a guy who can do what Crawford did: hit big shots and score.

    As for Harrington, I've never liked him and don't see how this trade benefits us. I doubt, after all, that Crawford would not have opted out of his contract. He can definitely get a better deal. By getting Harrington's expiring contract, we just get a guy who becomes a free agent and doesn't have the option of staying on or opting out, who's a damn bum. Anyway, that's just my 2 cents. I think someone put it best, in another thread, by saying that the Knicks are going on a two or three year vacation.

    I think it's unfair to the fans, for the team to be made into a squad that can't compete and won't even win 30 games.
    I wonder if D'Antoni had a say in this, because I remember Walsh saying that he was letting D'Antoni request which players he wanted, etc., which is why he claimed to be surprised about the Marbury situation.
    Last edited by OGKnickfan; Nov 26, 2008 at 12:48.

  9. #39
    Newbie KnIcKliFe031's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    BROOKLYN
    Posts
    12
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Originally Posted by abcd
    Personally, I think Al Harrington is going to lead the Knicks in scoring. Harrington averaged 17 points per game, in the 2004-2005 season and 18 points per game, in the 2005-2006 season.


    I think Wilson Chandler will be the second leading scorer, and Tim Thomas will be the 3rd leading scorer.

    What do you guys think?

    I forgot to put Wilson Chandler on the poll. Sorry about that.
    I WOULD OF PICK WILL THRILL IF U HAD HIM UP THERE AND NATE WILL BE RIGHT BEHIND HIM

  10. #40
    Member DANUTZ39's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    451
    Rep Power
    7

    Default

    Originally Posted by OriginalKnickGrandson
    I'm sorry TurnerAddict, I agree with them. I stated on the Curry for Harrinton trade thred that Harrington is another Z-Bo (of 07-08) Harrinton has more athletic ability than Z-Bo , but dosen't rebound? Harrington is a chucher like Jamal and Z-Bo except Z-Bo and Crawford are better shooters (beleive it or not) He is a ball hog, demonstrated in his first game here. He plays little to no defense and has no post game. I'm just glad that his contract is up before 2010.

    Tim Thomas> Al Harrinton
    1) Like tunner said is ok to agree or disagree with another usefull member of this site about how the Knicks are doing and there is nothing wrong with that.

    2) When you jump on and agree with a smuck that registered 20 min before his first post (which will probably be his last) and his only reson for joining is to diss the Knicks and to tell us how stupid we are then you are pathetic. It shows that you dont see the bigger picture, like why he joined, how he s thinking, what are his resons, etc.

    3) About the trades, like I said before, walsh did them not because he thought we are a championship or a playoff team and he needed to make a push but because he s looking at the bigger picture (knicks future). He thought if we gonna make the playoffs in the next 2 years(wich is not impossible, see atlanta last year) that will be a bonus but comes 2010 I'm gonna be a player in the Free Agent market (Lebron or not).

  11. #41
    KnicksonLIN.com
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    3,073
    Rep Power
    11

    Default

    Originally Posted by TunerAddict
    Dude, he wants our team to fail. What do you expect him to say?
    I also want your mother to have my child.

    You're nothing but a f*(king dumbass. I was being real. What? You want me to say Al Harrington is 10x better than Crawford and that the Knicks are going to have a dynasty? Just shut the f*(k up, you fat b!tch.

    You're nothing but a fat f*(k that sucks on Mardy Collins' dick. Keep sucking Collins' dick, and shut the f*(K up.

    And since you're a snitch, I'm sure you'll report this post, too. But I don't care. I'm a top poster.
    Last edited by abcd; Nov 26, 2008 at 15:50.

  12. #42
    Veteran TunerAddict's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    2,183
    Rep Power
    9

    Default

    Originally Posted by abcd
    I also want your mother to have my child.

    You're nothing but a f*(king dumbass. I was being real. What? You want me to say Al Harrington is 10x better than Crawford and that the Knicks are going to have a dynasty? Just shut the f*(k up, you fat b!tch.

    You're nothing but a fat f*(k that sucks on Mardy Collins' dick. Keep sucking Collins' dick, and shut the f*(K up.

    And since you're a snitch, I'm sure you'll report this post, too. But I don't care. I'm a top poster.
    You make me lol

  13. #43
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1,671
    Rep Power
    11

    Default

    my vote goes to david lee... my crystal ball shows him developing a 3 1/2 ft jumper and leading the knicks in scoring...

  14. #44
    Veteran OriginalKnickGrandson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    N.Y.
    Posts
    1,116
    Rep Power
    9

    Default

    Originally Posted by paris401
    my vote goes to david lee... my crystal ball shows him developing a 3 1/2 ft jumper and leading the knicks in scoring...

    Why allways so negative Paris? Maby its sarcasm, but I rarely read any post of yours that says something positive about the Knicks.


    just wondering?

  15. #45
    KnicksonLIN.com
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    3,073
    Rep Power
    11

    Default

    Originally Posted by paris401
    my vote goes to david lee... my crystal ball shows him developing a 3 1/2 ft jumper and leading the knicks in scoring...


    Now can you dig that, Sucka?!!!!!!

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 83
    Last Post: Nov 17, 2008, 08:48
  2. Replies: 83
    Last Post: Oct 28, 2008, 14:31
  3. Farewell Marbury???
    By lanceroy in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 154
    Last Post: Jul 10, 2008, 18:22
  4. Looking back on the 2003-04 Knicks season
    By metrocard in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: Jun 28, 2008, 21:10
  5. New York Knicks at Atlanta Hawks Game Thread 2/29
    By MSGKnickz33 in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 69
    Last Post: Mar 01, 2008, 09:58

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •