I think Nate is much better than Crawford. He's taking pretty good shots most of the time, ones he usually makes. He's just going through a really bad shooting slump.
We really suck in the 4th quarter. We were playing pretty well the whole game, and then our shots stop falling, no ball movement. Part of it maybe from being tired, maybe they get nervous, I don't know. Either way, we need to improve our composure in the 4th quarter.
Yea. Harrington's biggest problem is the 3 ball. He takes way too many when it isn't his forte. He can take those guys off the dribble. You're totally right. He just needs to realize that the best shot is the shot you take, and the best shot for him is posting and toasting on whoever is guarding him, because usually its a guy hes much faster than and can shake off him.
Hey I did'nt watch the game b/c I watched the college football game but I have the Knicks game tivoed.I know they lost but whoever watched it tell me should I watch it or not.If its one of those games that gets you pissed then I don't want to watch.
Not as much as Crawford would of lost the game for us.
All of Jamal's clutch shots are tainted, because he has had so many moments of failure and losing; hitting 4-5 clutch shots doesn't make up for HUNDREDS of loses Crawford has been the main culprit of.
Long live the worst defender and decision maker in the NBA.
Firstly: I think it's wrong to dump a heap of blame on Robinson, when he's usually very dependable: the guy is usually automatic. These past two games, he's shot the ball poorly. It's a slump, and he'll eventually snap out of it.
Secondly: Where's the criticism for Richardson? Outside of Tuner, nobody's come out and stated the obvious: the guy stinks and should not be playing big minutes. Before Crawford was even traded, I stated this; and the Crawford haters came out, saying that Richardson was better and was once "the best player on the Knicks:" Twilight Zone material.
Thirdly: Crawford is gone, and the Knicks are still losing. Bottom line, before Crawford left, we were a game over .500. Now, we're 12-20 or whatever. Crawford is a streak shooter, reminiscent of John Starks or Latrell Sprewell.
He's not needed for D: he's a 2. He's not needed for PG duties, again, because he's a 2. What he does is get hot, sometimes very hot, and score in bunches. His first year with the Knicks, he was losing the ball off of his foot, that type of stuff, though not on every touch, as the haters on here like to say. I liked his game, even then. Since his first season with us, he's played well. And 4-5 game winners is just ludicrous BS, from the same person who said he was "the worst player in the history of the nba." Jamal can play. Why else would Lebron tell the cavs to make a play for him?
Shooting in the low 40's is not ideal, but AI, Kidd, TMAC and many others shoot around the low 40's, without being bashed. The reason Crawford hasn't been able to shine is because he's been put on teams that are dysfunctional. The same reason that the Marburians give for why Marbury has had little success.
I've actually gone to Knick games, and the guy is out there, before all other players, getting ready to play, shooting and running drills. Find somebody else to blame.
Crawford didn't need to play defense because he played the 2?
LMAOOOOOOOOOOOO.
Crawford only had 4-5 game winners, honestly.
Stop acting like he had 20 and get off his nuts.
One game over .500, in what? like 15 games?
Crawford has gave the Knicks some one of the worst LOSING seasons CONSISTENTLY this franchise has ever seen.
He will forever be the biggest LOSER in the NBA, check out his winning %, the worst in the NBA.
And its getting WORSE.
You say we got worse without Crawford, well did the Warriors get any better?
LMAO
No.
Crawford stinks.
Hop off him.
k, thanks.
T'Mac is a 45% shooter
J'Kidd can't shoot.
Iverson is a career 27 ppg player, where as Crawford is 15. AI always got a lot of heat, now he's a cancer in Detroit.
This team lacks a leader and intelligence on the decisive moments, I don't understand why the hell Harrington shoots the ball every time he has it, even with 2 defenders on him.
all im sayin at the moment is, jamal right now is needed on the knicks more then al harrington, when jamal was here majority of ya hated jamals shot selection, well al harrington's shot selection may be worse, at times this guy be falling from a spin move and he still shoots..we suck in the 4th quarter and jamal was top 5 in scorin in the 4th
lmao at eddy playin
now..
for the game..
If you were to tell me last year that we would almost beat the Mavs ever this year I would not believe you, so I say good game
A-Yo, Mr. Planter, aren't you the one having players' babies and saying that you love the big ****? If anything, you should get off of nuts.
Craw was a good player. I don't know what games you were watching, but the ones I saw had Craw scoring in bunches, which is what you want from your players and scoring in the clutch, way more than 5 times.
In fact, Craw was one of the few bright spots we had. He was streaky, but he did enough to HELP us get wins, if he had had the HELP to do so. After all, one player isn't capable of winning games on his own.
What exposes your faggot ass is how you fail to ever criticize Marbury, who I like but not to the point where I can't criticize him, Richardson, who you called the best Knick, at one point, or Harrington, who went 5 for 18, last night, without a word from you.
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ME AND THE REST: I MAKE UP MY OWN MIND!!!
lmao curry looked madd tired with just 3 minutes. Wow im getting really tired of losing in the 4th quarter
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote