Crawford didn't need to play defense because he played the 2?
LMAOOOOOOOOOOOO.
Crawford only had 4-5 game winners, honestly.
Stop acting like he had 20 and get off his nuts.
One game over .500, in what? like 15 games?
Crawford has gave the Knicks some one of the worst LOSING seasons CONSISTENTLY this franchise has ever seen.
He will forever be the biggest LOSER in the NBA, check out his winning %, the worst in the NBA.
And its getting WORSE.
You say we got worse without Crawford, well did the Warriors get any better?
LMAO
No.
Crawford stinks.
Hop off him.
k, thanks.
T'Mac is a 45% shooter
J'Kidd can't shoot.
Iverson is a career 27 ppg player, where as Crawford is 15. AI always got a lot of heat, now he's a cancer in Detroit.
A-Yo, Mr. Planter, aren't you the one having players' babies and saying that you love the big cock? If anything, you should get off of nuts.
Craw was a good player. I don't know what games you were watching, but the ones I saw had Craw scoring in bunches, which is what you want from your players and scoring in the clutch, way more than 5 times.
In fact, Craw was one of the few bright spots we had. He was streaky, but he did enough to HELP us get wins, if he had had the HELP to do so. After all, one player isn't capable of winning games on his own.
What exposes your faggot ass is how you fail to ever criticize Marbury, who I like but not to the point where I can't criticize him, Richardson, who you called the best Knick, at one point, or Harrington, who went 5 for 18, last night, without a word from you.
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ME AND THE REST: I MAKE UP MY OWN MIND!!!:afro: