Are you crazy or something, biatch? I ain't reading this boring 5hit.
This faggot is stalking me, trying to blow my morsilla.
You last visited: Today at 15:26
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]: Unread 20, Total 28.
<object width="425" height="344">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/rm81LSKJC2k&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></object>
Last edited by OGKnickfan; Apr 11, 2009 at 14:41.
taking everything mad literal. while we're mostly joking.
gayblack, you showed your true colors with that racist ****. i say "ni66a" the way most people use the word "dude" or "man", not because of someone's skin color. your an ignorant mofo.
as for penis-addict, what took you so long? I knew you wouldn't keep your mouth shut, seeing as how you're the biggest hater in KO. don't think i won't diss the **** outta you just cause you're a ****ing cripple.
I don't really know what else he does - but I do know he's had other problems. There's a history with these people. And it's very telling.
And, for the record, I know people use the n-word as saying dude, my argument was if you can do that to a white person, why can't a white person use a slur of sorts in the same way? In what way does that make me racist, any more than using the n-word in the same way makes you a racist? I'm sure you two idiots will have no answer and will just post random animated .gifs and ****, which is typical of your m.o.
Enough evidence - counselor? Fools? Morons? Meanwhile - you didn't even acknowledge all the lies that this guy posted - twisting our posts and calling people stupid for not acquiescing to every single belief he holds. You should mind YOUR business - especially when you don' even know the history of the argument.
You've completely discredited yourself - for now and ever - by saying you never insulted anyone - when you clearly did. You said a few morons infiltrated Knicks online and named abcd explicitly. Only other person in that argument - on abcd's side - was me. You clearly tried to attack sly - when he co-signed on something metro said - but you said nothing to metro.
You're as soft as a mr. softee in July at high noon.
Here's Kblack - folks:
I didn't say anything to metro because he likes to stir the pot, he knows it, I know it, everyone here knows it. He just says people won or he won just to get everyone riled up. He's done it on several threads. Responding to him would just be giving him exactly what he wanted to do, more drama.
I never specifically implicated you, I said a few morons have infiltrated this site. I never said anything about a few morons (plural) infiltrating this discussion. A few morons HAVE infiltrated this site, and you took offense to that. Are you admitting you are a moron? My post only had something to do with abcd, whom I still believe is one of the dumbest people on this site (including even you). You jumped into defend him. Then yelled at me for defending people...explanation? You have none.
Edit: Also, I've read this thread. I didn't see much twisting of arguments at all to tell you the truth. They quoted you in full, it happens. My advice would be to let it go if they twisted your words around, because obviously they are going to do anything and everything to get the better of you including lie. But I don't really think they did.
i'd like to make a comment about donnie and what he has/has not done for the knicks, but i'm afraid i'll get caught in the cross-fire..
And then he edits his post to talk about (HAHAHA) his opinion, "to tell you the truth," as he claims. The guy has nuts, I'll give him that much: a true piece of work.
Your failure to supposedly find anything, GayBlack, shows you should mind your business, in the future, since the twisting of posts is a long standing problem with tuna and lgay, from other threads and into this one: where it is clear as day. If you can't find it on this thread, even though it's mentioned numerous times, it further proves your lack of skills to be a lawyer or a balanced, honest and fair person, i.e. to have integrity. Even though this is just the internet, you're still providing a psychological profile of a person of little to no character and no scruples, whatsoever. It is disconcerting to think that someone like you might someday be in a position to decide the fate of others.
Furthermore, your inability to comprehend the dynamics of twisting facts, an essential part of legal analysis, is disturbing, particularly if you indeed are to become a lawyer. I hope you get that straight, seriously, for the sake of whomever might work with you, someday.
And finally, I'm not re-posting the twisting of people's words, by Tuna and LGAY, laid out clearly in this thread, because they're both known for that sort of conduct, and, in fact, people have confronted them on it, on numerous occasions. You have an agenda, obviously: protecting your daddies, which is why you say you can't find anything, no matter how hard you search, to change the idealized view that you have of them.
All right , enjoy your day of lurking KO.
Last edited by OGKnickfan; Apr 15, 2009 at 05:10.
I assume by "post manipulation" you are referring to when abcd said he never wanted Craw and Z traded, then LJ showed a post where abcd gave his ideas for a trade, and the abcd said that he was talking about trading Eddy Curry in the post immediately "proceeding" (sic - it's preceeding) post?
It's very simple, wanting to trade Eddy Curry has nothing to do with whether or not he would be open to trading Z and Craw. The evidence cited is completely irrelevant, all it shows is his preference to trade Curry. That's it. LJ showed a post where abcd listed ideas to trade Z and Craw, and abcd could bring in no evidence showing that he ever said he didn't want to trade them. All the Eddy Curry quote shows, again, is his penchant towards trading Eddy Curry.
You could also be referring to when you said something about how you hate flamers, and then they claim you went and supported one. I don't see how this is twisted at all. abcd is one of the biggest flammers/spammers/trolls on this website, most of his posts consist of him posting weird ass pictures and throwing insults without really making any argument at all. Then you went and supported him. Whether or not you are supporting him because he is "standing up" to people that flame is also irrelevant, because supporting a flamer who stands up to flamers is still supporting a flamer. Any way you slice it. Perhaps I'm twisting now, but it's not that hard.