Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Conspiracy Theory: Ricky had to be drafted for the Knicks, right?

  1. #1
    Quiet Storm New New York's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    2,431
    Rep Power
    16

    Default Conspiracy Theory: Ricky had to be drafted for the Knicks, right?

    Ok, when Rubio was selected at 5th I kicked the air like most Knick fans, but, I wasnt really expecting him to fall to 8. But, when Minny selected Flynn, not Curry (more on that in a second) I got a bit excited, not that Curry was going to NY, but, Rubio had to be on the move. It seemed a trade had to be in the works, and who else had the chips to nab him in the lottery. But, we selected Hill (Wolves already have Jefferson) and that notion faded quickly.

    Ok, but Minny story is not adding up, here is why...They at first said they thought both players could play sided by side. Well since Rubio is the furthest thing from a combo guard and Flynn at best can give you a few spot minutes the SG, but, is in no way a full time starter at that position, then why would they draft them both. Why would they try to tell that blatant lie? It Doesnt add up, Why if they wanted a player who could play with Rubio or Flynn did they not just Draft Curry, who can play the SG? Drafting Rubio and Curry gives them the best draft of the night!

    Now yesterday they said they drafted Flynn because they knew Rubio might bounce. Ok, then why not go for the sure shot move and draft Curry and Flynn? Both players report to Minny and you let G-State deal with Rubio's contract and desire to play there? Curry and Flynn in the same draft is considered a good night, Rubio and Flynn leaves heads scratching.

    Or why not Draft Curry and Rubio, and in the event that Rubio fails to report, you still got one of the most coveted players in the draft?

    Why report to ESPN 10 minutes after the Flynn pick was made that you were keeping both, essentially shooting down all trade inquiries on one of most busy day for draft day trades (and on a trade day with All Stars being let go for nothing) without hearing options for a player you thought you'd might lose anyways?

    Then there is the Ty Lawson pick, obviously the trade with Denver was done before this pick was ever made. After all Donnie Walsh did say that his former protege always is thinking 3 and 4 steps ahead on every move he makes. He clearly did with Lawson, and likely did with Rubio, the question is was it for his former mentor?

    Or why not keep Lawson if they thought Rubio might not report? Again Flynn had to be the player they thought could play the SG if they kept Rubio and Flynn, so drafting Ty Lawson gives them that same option. Not to mention, by time Lawson was picked Rubio's agent by then had to let them know Rubio was considering going back to Spain, another reason they wouldve thought to hold on to Lawson. They couldve traded Lawson to Den all Summer, why do it so soon with the possibility of having Rubio bolt?

    And lastly, the order of the picks. Drafting Rubio first and then Flynn seems like a formality more than anything right? Wrong! If they took Flynn first (the player that it seems they really intended on keeping all along) then it saved them about 1.5 million over the life of the contract by picking Flynn with the 6th not the 5th.

    As a Knick fan it my job, to be overly optimistic about the Knicks getting the best players. So maybe I'm looking too much into it, but, Minny certainley had more logical options than drafting Rubio. Now plus that with Walsh's connection with Kahn and you now have reason to think that the Rubio could've been for us all along.

    Only time will tell!
    Last edited by New New York; Jun 27, 2009 at 08:15.

  2. #2
    Superstar Scribbles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    607
    Rep Power
    7

    Default

    Minnesota is playing ransom.

    They know who wants Rubio and they traded up to dangle him and/or Curry in front of teams so they can add better pieces to their team than just one rookie and Mike Miller/Foye.

    I think a deal is definitely set in stone and it won't happen until maybe August so it doesn't look like the two teams tampered with the rules.

    It's so stupid, might as well have the FA start on Draft Night, so this type of stunt doesn't get pulled off again.

    It's tedious and annoying. We know Rubio is getting traded - to the Knicks.



    Now we just have to wait and watch Kahn and Walsh rehearse their act.

  3. #3
    Member Knicker23's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    CT 203
    Posts
    430
    Rep Power
    7

    Default

    you mean July?

  4. #4
    Superstar Scribbles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    607
    Rep Power
    7

    Default

    No, August. They have to put on a act for us so it won't be so obvious....

    Act 1 1st week of July: MINN doesn't want to trade Rubio
    Act 2 2nd week of July: MINN is hearing offers
    Act 3 3rd week of July: MINN wants Hill + N8 + 1st round Pick in 2011. Donnie refuses.
    Act 4 4th week of July: Another team pitches a deal to MINN
    Act 5: 2nd Week of August: MINN ends up dealing Rubio to NY for....?

    The end.

    Would be sweet if this got pulled off next week though LOL

  5. #5
    Veteran
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    7,301
    Rep Power
    20

    Nyk Logo

    Did the Knicks draft a much needed player for the team with the 8th pick?

  6. #6
    12th man
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Far far away from the orgy that consist of clyde, 8's, rady, smokes and rono
    Posts
    11,260
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Originally Posted by Kiyaman
    Did the Knicks draft a much needed player for the team with the 8th pick?
    If we get Rubio, yes.

  7. #7
    The Knicks are Back DaTPRiNCE's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Brooklyn N.Y.........Alexandria,Egypt in the blood
    Posts
    3,862
    Rep Power
    12

    Default

    next tuesday is the day im looking at cause thats when we can start doing sign-and-trades, Rubio will in all likelihood be a knick its just a matter of time right

    i would love to see Rubio to Hill alley-oops

  8. #8
    Veteran jpz17's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    2,782
    Rep Power
    10

    Default

    Rubio has said "inside word" if he is on a team like Minn he will NEVER play there.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 9
    Last Post: Jun 23, 2009, 18:07
  2. Cavs @ Knicks 11/25 7:30 PM ET
    By jpz17 in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 65
    Last Post: Nov 26, 2008, 21:10
  3. Replies: 83
    Last Post: Nov 17, 2008, 09:48
  4. Lampe signs with NY Knicks
    By KnickFan2080 in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: Jan 28, 2008, 00:17
  5. 11 Names on the Knicks Wanted List
    By keyindabox in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: May 06, 2004, 23:25

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •