What's the point? We are trying to cut salary not substitute it.
A rumor surfaced a few months ago that Washington were interested in bringing back Jeffries. This may sound odd to Knicks fans but it is believed that the Wiz miss Jefferies defensive abilities. Unlike the Knicks, the Wiz don't seem to be chasing 2010 as they already have three All-Star level players in Butler,Arenas and Jamison.Originally Posted by Marc Berman of NYPost
It would definately mean Nate is gone but i'd rather lose Nate and Jefferies for Mike James who is somewhat useful then trade them for Kenny Thomas of the Kings who has no value.
This also will clear some money for David Lees signing. And hopefully we'd be able to trade Nate for some sort of asset or a draft choice.
Is this actually being discussed or just another trade scenerio that we like how it works to our advantage?
"I'd Rather Melo shoot with 3 men on him than Jefferies shotting wide open"
-Jeff Van Gundy
Thing is there were rumors about the Wizards pursuing Jared Jeffries as well
I mean he WAS (no pun intended) on the team back when they were, you know, good. I assume they could use his defense and what do they really need Mike James for at this point, really?