Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 45 of 45

Thread: 3 Reasons why the Knicks are losers

  1. #31
    12th man
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Far far away from the orgy that consist of clyde, 8's, rady, smokes and rono
    Posts
    11,260
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Lopez is slow??? Gallinari isn't?
    He's 7 foot and moves well for his size.

    Man, you're just not making any damn sense.
    Stop crying about your opinion, the stuff your saying is really STUPID, there is no debate about that.

    Jordan Hill top 5??? LOL

    Over Evans, Jennings, Griffin, Harden, Lawson, Collinson, DeRozan, Flynn, and even possibly Rubio.

    What the hell has Jordan Hill done for him to be PROJECTED as top 5?

    You're hopeless on this.

    Yea kid, I know you're DONE, because you would look just straight up ignorant to keep this stupidity going. Walk out of here like the dumbass you are.

  2. #32
    Veteran ANU's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    1,068
    Rep Power
    8

    Default

    .......this **** sucker.i just got pawned by metrotard.lolz.whatever shall i do?this coming from a ****bury lover.I'm gonna donate to the special olympics just for you.I'm proud of you metro.keep up the stupidity.so when is your girl gonna log on to help you out with this one?

  3. #33
    12th man
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Far far away from the orgy that consist of clyde, 8's, rady, smokes and rono
    Posts
    11,260
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    You okay man?

  4. #34
    Superstar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    962
    Rep Power
    8

    Default

    Lopez > Gallinari end of discussion. Gallinari is a nice player and has potential to be a good 1st option. I would build around Lopez however....brings it on both sides of the court hits 85% free throw....Could be a Pat Ewing in the making.

  5. #35
    Sexy Stud knickzrulezH20's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    1,781
    Rep Power
    8

    Default

    Originally Posted by ANU
    .......this **** sucker.i just got pawned by metrotard.lolz.whatever shall i do?this coming from a ****bury lover.I'm gonna donate to the special olympics just for you.I'm proud of you metro.keep up the stupidity.so when is your girl gonna log on to help you out with this one?

    i agree that gallinari will be better than lopez in about 2 years. but you cant bash lopez like you did. he is a good center right now, who will be a great center next year. and lopez isnt slow for his position, gallinari is sadly. and jordan hill a frontline version of danny granger? its been pissing me off at how stupid this forum can be. first lawrence frank, then some1 callin gallo kyle korver, and now this? wtf? danny granger?? you making yourself look foolish. jordan hill has NOTHING in common with danny granger other than they are both black. and then u trying to say value wise?? top 5 pick?? over rubio, jennings, lawson, evans, griffen, flynn, harden?? gtfo
    Last edited by knickzrulezH20; Dec 03, 2009 at 18:26.

  6. #36
    Sexy Stud knickzrulezH20's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    1,781
    Rep Power
    8

    Default

    Originally Posted by metrocard
    You okay man?
    hes got ****ing down syndrome.

  7. #37
    Veteran ANU's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    1,068
    Rep Power
    8

    Default

    Originally Posted by knickzrulezH20
    i agree that gallinari will be better than lopez in about 2 years. but you cant bash lopez like you did. he is a good center right now, who will be a great center next year. and lopez isnt slow for his position, gallinari is sadly. and jordan hill a frontline version of danny granger? its been pissing me off at how stupid this forum can be. first lawrence frank, then some1 callin gallo kyle korver, and now this? wtf? danny granger?? you making yourself look foolish. jordan hill has NOTHING in common with danny granger other than they are both black. and then u trying to say value wise?? top 5 pick?? over rubio, jennings, lawson, evans, griffen, flynn, harden?? gtfo
    1.lopez is team hasn't won a game.ok, maybe i over did it with ****ting on him, I'm just not a fan, i got carried away.

    2.again, for the third time, I'm talking about VALUE in comparing granger with hill.
    you want to say hill won't be better than rubio, ok, at this point they've played how much time in the nba in comparison to each other in the league?

    a good "big" is more VALUABLE than a good guard.rubio will be nothing more than a good guard.

    gallinari looked like pretty atheletic in italy, now his back is fine, yet you say he's slow for his position; could it be because of the speed of the euro game compared to the nba game?

    that won't affect rubio though right? a pg with a ****ing set shot, in comparison to a big live active body with a decent jumper a good motor, and athletisicm, and who's shown abilty to block shots.

    but yeah, a rubio will be more valuable in the nba.ok.


    I'm not even going to get into the other guys.cause i don't need to.you gotta it all figured out, jerkoff.

    clearly, every prospect thats not in a knick uniform is better than those that are.

    and no, i don't have "****ing" down syndrome.and no i won't gtfo.you can eat a dick though.just saying.....

  8. #38
    Veteran GetRealistic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,370
    Rep Power
    9

    Default

    Originally Posted by ANU
    1.lopez is team hasn't won a game.ok, maybe i over did it with ****ting on him, I'm just not a fan, i got carried away.

    2.again, for the third time, I'm talking about VALUE in comparing granger with hill.
    you want to say hill won't be better than rubio, ok, at this point they've played how much time in the nba in comparison to each other in the league?

    a good "big" is more VALUABLE than a good guard.rubio will be nothing more than a good guard.

    gallinari looked like pretty atheletic in italy, now his back is fine, yet you say he's slow for his position; could it be because of the speed of the euro game compared to the nba game?

    that won't affect rubio though right? a pg with a ****ing set shot, in comparison to a big live active body with a decent jumper a good motor, and athletisicm, and who's shown abilty to block shots.

    but yeah, a rubio will be more valuable in the nba.ok.


    I'm not even going to get into the other guys.cause i don't need to.you gotta it all figured out, jerkoff.

    clearly, every prospect thats not in a knick uniform is better than those that are.

    and no, i don't have "****ing" down syndrome.and no i won't gtfo.you can eat a dick though.just saying.....
    Give this guy a kleenex

  9. #39
    Veteran ANU's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    1,068
    Rep Power
    8

    Default

    Originally Posted by GetRealistic
    Give this guy a kleenex
    for what....Im not crying about lopez and jennings.

  10. #40
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    2,845
    Rep Power
    12

    Default

    I'd rather have Gallo over Lopez in a vacuum. But for our roster and franchise, especially after Hill, drafting Lopez and we'd be infinitely more primed, re: Plan 2010.

    PG and C have been and are our biggest needs, as much or more than any team in the NBA. We got nada.

    Maybe we can put Hill at our C; and Walsh can pull a rabbit from his hat and hook us up with a Fernandez, Harris, Flynn, Rubio before next season.

    Dump Jeffries and/or Curry this season by throwing in Lee, Harrington, Nate to sweeton the pot, and give us the power to go after a tagteam influx of bigtime FAs.

  11. #41
    Veteran TunerAddict's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    2,183
    Rep Power
    9

    Default

    Originally Posted by metrocard
    Simply draft decisions.

    Gallinari over Lopez (we needed a true center)

    Jordan Hill over a PG(Lawson, Jennings,Holliday, Maynor, Collison, and many others)

    Drafting Toney Douglas over Blair or Budinger.


    Check this

    If we had a core

    of Lawson, Budinger, Lopez..

    We be so straight right now.
    Still sounds like a losing team...

  12. #42
    Sexy Stud knickzrulezH20's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    1,781
    Rep Power
    8

    Default

    Originally Posted by TunerAddict
    Still sounds like a losing team...
    it would be, and my 3 biggest reasons

    1.) isiah thomas
    2.) eddy curry deal
    3.) starbury deal (yea trading for francis, zbo, jalen rose, made no sense at all, but those trades arent taking our 2010 first round draft pick)

  13. #43
    Veteran nyk_nyk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    3,529
    Rep Power
    15

    Default Let's revisit

    Originally Posted by nyk_nyk
    2. Coaching - Dantoni was one of the best in Phoenix but reality has set in and he has been exposed as narrow and linear. His coaching only extends to SSOL and doesn't properly adjust to maximize execution. There is certainly a responsibility of all the players to perform on the court every game, but they don't always do it and it is the coach's job to motivate and or substitute as necessary to create the right chemistry. We all know Gallo's playing time and shots should be increased, but for some reason Dantoni refuses to address these issues. I mentioned above that Gallo needs to learn how to move without the ball. He also needs to be more agressive among other things but this is what practice is for and if Dantoni can't draw up some plays for him them he will continue to hang around the 3pt line all game. I guess that's not a problem since Dantoni never yells at anyone for taking a 3 pointer no matter how awful it is. Dantoni doesn't understand how to win in crunch time either, probably because he doesn't understand the difference between low and high percentage shots.
    Nearly 3 years later and this still holds true. Why do people continue to support this man when no matter who the players are, the SAME issues exist?

  14. #44
    Member CoolRunnings's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Brooklyn, Bay Ridge NY
    Posts
    482
    Rep Power
    5

    Default

    Originally Posted by ANU
    drafting over need is stupid; lopez ain't tim duncan.i happen to think he blows.i mean his team is winless for pete sake.you'd think td part 2 would be resposible for a win.

    we didn't go with jennings.i wished they had.but hill has a lot of upside.he's going to be a frontline version of granger.he's going to be that sort of value pick imo.

    we've had little glimpses of hill and gallo beucase our coach insists on playing certain players.who's to say jennings wouldn't be riding the pine here?
    ??????? Drafting over need is stupid??????? I'm no pro basketball GM but........

  15. #45
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    2,845
    Rep Power
    12

    Default

    Originally Posted by CoolRunnings
    ??????? Drafting over need is stupid??????? I'm no pro basketball GM but........

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 219
    Last Post: Apr 15, 2009, 06:35
  2. Cavs @ Knicks 11/25 7:30 PM ET
    By jpz17 in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 65
    Last Post: Nov 26, 2008, 20:10
  3. Knicks 2007-2008 Season Recap
    By abcd in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: Feb 24, 2008, 11:12
  4. At What Point Will You Say The Knicks Are Better Without Steph?
    By Eddy Currys House Special in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 130
    Last Post: Jan 21, 2008, 16:25
  5. New York Knicks vs Chicago Bulls Game Thread 1/8/08
    By MSGKnickz33 in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 90
    Last Post: Jan 11, 2008, 16:29

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •