Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: The Blame One Player Fallacy

  1. #1
    Enlightened OGKnickfan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    944
    Rep Power
    7

    Default The Blame One Player Fallacy

    One thing I have learned, from coaching basketball, is that even the most poorly skilled player, if he cooperates with your system, is an asset.

    Sometimes, your most highly skilled player, if he alienates teammates, fails to get them involved, etc., is your worst player.

    Right now, the Knicks don't seem to have a player that singlehandedly ruins games for everyone. Rather, we seem to be suffering from a lack of a competent big man. And, as a coach, I can tell you that a tough, intelligent big man is the most important thing in basketball: he can get you easy buckets, move the ball between the three point areas and the low post and elsewhere, save the team from easy layups by wing players, guarantee you get your boards, etc.

    Still, people continue to look for a player to blame for our perpetual losing, be it Curry, Duhon, Crawford, Harrington, Jeffries, amongst others. Some of these players played center, sure, but it's up to a GM to obtain players that make it so these players aren't playing in the middle.

    Currently, the punching bag is Duhon. Duhon, however, is just a distributor. We had Ward and Childs, both shot poorly from the field, which seems to be the main beef with Duhon, and were merely distributors. Still, for years, the Knicks were contenders.

    So, when our team sucks as much as they do, for as long as it has, can all the blame simply be dumped on this one crappy player?

    As during the Childs-Ward era, we could use a PG upgrade. However, as long as we continue to ignore our lack of a replacement for Patrick Ewing, i.e., a center that can block easy layup shots and score in the post, we will continue to suck.

    For evidence as to the truth of this, simply look at how Crawford and Zach Randolph are doing, now that they can play alongside competent bigs: Horford (Crawford) and Gasol (Randolph). Both are in their respective conferences' playoffs race. Both are winning, and both have, with their play, created buzz around themselves and their teams.

    If we had kept both, whilst adding a good big man, I predict we'd be a 4-6 seed in the East. David Lee, as good as he is at what he does, isn't a center: his post game isn't on the level, or consistency, of that of a good center, his shot blocking is non-existent. If he could play alongside a good center, his efforts would not be, or naught.

    Just look at how well Memphis does with Randolph and Gasol (a real center) in their frontcourt. Compare that to DLee and Jeffries in the Knicks' frontcourt. What's the common denominator? Two good power forwards: Randolph and Lee. Yet in one situation, the team is winning (Randolph's), while in the other (Lee's) they aren't. Why? Because Lee isn't a real center (Jeffries is just a bum), and he should be playing power forward alongside an actual center.

    As things are, and I'm sure this will offend the Knicks' 2010 cult, I see the team's future as being very shaky, for years to come.

    Walsh and D'Antoni are too reactionary, too impatient. Instead of being wise enough to know that 2010 is just some stupid pop culture craze, they seem to have bought into it. They could have seen the value in certain of our team's previous players, kept those and gotten rid of others.

    Instead, when the media began talking about purging everything from the Isiah era, they did exactly what everyone in pop-sports, including people not at all professionally involved in basketball, said they should.

    I hope, for the sake of the team, Walsh doesn't simply try to buy a good team. We failed at that. We have some worthwhile players. Let's keep them, get rid of the bums, pick up a solid big and, if we can, a good shooting guard.

  2. #2
    Veteran p0nder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    1,323
    Rep Power
    10

    Default

    I would have to agree that it's not one player. it's a bunch of players and a short rotation. However I don't really see many solid players on this team. I am curious to see who you think is worthwhile to keep.

    Currently i'm not really sold on anyone aside from gallo and thats only because i see a lot of potential for the future, not as a player on the floor now.

    In my latest post on the raptors/knicks game thread i blame duhon on the offensive side of things, and D.lee and jefferies on the defensive side. Certainly it's a team loss, we win and lose as a team. But in games there are players that should be held accountable for their play.

    Duhon made poor passing decisions and even worse shot selection. He didn't distribute the ball to hot shooters and instead jacked up ugly shots or passed to players that were not open. Obviously he is not responsible for other players poor play and shooting but he is responsible for executing the offense. Much like a quarterback on a football team takes the heat when the offense doesn't perform and execute, the pg on a poorly run offense is the person that people look to first.

  3. #3
    Super Moderator RunningJumper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    4,001
    Rep Power
    16

    Default

    Definitely, lately I have been bashing Duhon, but I know he's not the only problem, far from it.My main problem is with D'Antoni.Why play players doing badly?I mean, yes, Duhon is a pass-first PG, but not in a good way.I rather the other positions just move the ball without being astounding playmakers, which Duhon isn't.At the very least Duhon should come off the bench for Nate or Hughes.I don't know about Hughes, but not has shown the effort of being a PG when given the chance.Of course, he didn't get many chances so maybe if he did get a lot of opportunities he wouldn't be consistent, but at this point, it's worth a show.Nate and Hughes at least try to finish at the basket and makes open lay-ups.

  4. #4
    Moderator
    CoolClyde's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Bronx
    Posts
    2,469
    Rep Power
    20

    Default I blame Duhon

    I have to disagree, I think PG position is key, moreso than having a true big man. When Duhon plays decently, Knicks win more often than not. When Duhon sucks the big one, like just about EVERY KNICK LOSS THIS SEASON, they lose. Look at Knicks win/losses and his (+/-)...
    More than 1/2 his dimes go to DLEE, and a small percentage to Gallo, who leads league in 3's. He's slow, he turns the ball over in key situations, and if pick n roll ain't working, he tends to disappear. The SSOL doesn't work with Duhon, because he's a turtle with no spunk or drive.
    D'amntoni's love of Duhon is incomprehensible, but who else do we have to run this squad? Brandon Jennings? weep.

    PS: psst... D'amntoni... Tony Douglas.

Similar Threads

  1. Official Big **** Thread
    By metrocard in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 212
    Last Post: Dec 13, 2010, 14:55
  2. Walsh Transcript
    By Crazy⑧s in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: Jun 23, 2009, 14:20
  3. NBA Player of the Week: Jamal Crawford
    By New New York in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: Jan 20, 2008, 16:44
  4. LARRY IS AS MUCH TO BLAME AS ISIAH
    By furious lord in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: Dec 10, 2007, 06:17
  5. What's Wrong With The League 2
    By ShairanXIII in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 42
    Last Post: Jun 19, 2007, 11:11

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •