Red
TYPE-A
@ Trill
I.e... You support coach. Read carefully... As a confident adult, I can understand it... But you keep repeating and defending your position... And subsequently think you're smart enough to call me out as you do what you accuse me of. Your love for me has clouded your judgement and your complex is permiating through your writing. You're not quite there yet... A for effort... Anyway
Hummm... Did I say you were anti-defense? B/c you seem to feel you can speak for everyone. Again, being short isn't personal. Your complex and subsequent rants on your soap-box indicate your threatened position and screams insecurity. Coupled w/ your propensity to argue (using childish tech's which I exposed) is indicative of your inferior introspect. Its all right Trill. Back to your hogwash...
No, I don't want to know what the Knick identity is now... If I did I would of asked.This is all anecdotal and poppycock...want to know what the Knicks identity is right now? Losers!
If that changes and it happens to be from an explosive high flying offense then that will be our identity. If it comes from lock-down defense then great!
I.e... You support coach. Read carefully... As a confident adult, I can understand it... But you keep repeating and defending your position... And subsequently think you're smart enough to call me out as you do what you accuse me of. Your love for me has clouded your judgement and your complex is permiating through your writing. You're not quite there yet... A for effort... Anyway
No one is anti-defense and that includes D'ant. (BTW, the 70's Knicks who won two titles may have played good defense but they were known for their unselfish play and constant ball movement something D'ant emphasizes)
Hummm... Did I say you were anti-defense? B/c you seem to feel you can speak for everyone. Again, being short isn't personal. Your complex and subsequent rants on your soap-box indicate your threatened position and screams insecurity. Coupled w/ your propensity to argue (using childish tech's which I exposed) is indicative of your inferior introspect. Its all right Trill. Back to your hogwash...
Exactly, w/o defensive players we won't be a defensive team.Those teams you mentioned were not defined by their nick names or identity...the players played and won a specific way and EARNED that identity. The key being the PLAYERS. The Bronx Bombers could call themselves that all day but without homerun hitters it would be some random nickname without meaning.
Last edited: