Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Isola reports Knicks might take PG Luke Ridnour

  1. #1
    Veteran Paul1355's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    East Coast
    Posts
    5,615
    Rep Power
    16

    Default Isola reports Knicks might take PG Luke Ridnour

    Frank Isola: Sources claim [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] He's no Brandon Jennings but I'll take him. [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]


    Again more rumors but we know the Knicks are not sold with Douglas as the starting PG. I like Douglas and think he will be a very good PG if he can be consistent on offense. BUT Luke Ridnour had one of his best seasons last year and is a very good distributor and outside shooter.

    Signing him to a MLE isn't a bad deal.

    Thoughts?

  2. #2
    Superstar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    519
    Rep Power
    9

    Default

    I'd rather the knicks take a chance with Shaun Livingston, he's cheaper and theres possibly more upside.

  3. #3
    Member knicksfancris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    250
    Rep Power
    8

    Default

    why not take a shot a rafer alston he be a cheap guy we could use for a year and he wants to relley play here and he has playoff experience

  4. #4
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,857
    Rep Power
    11

    Default

    Yeah I was thinking Rafer Alston for the veterans' minimum...

    Actually, the more I think about it, Luke Ridnour wouldn't be too bad.

    These are his stats PER 36 MINUTES:

    17.4 points on 47.8% shooting with 6.6 assists and 1.1 steals

    That's not half bad at all...average starting PG in the league probably

  5. #5
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    10
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Luke Will Do Great In This O, I Say 14.7 And 9.5
    Dats If Yu Get Those Stars In Fa

  6. #6
    Evacuee Crazy⑧s's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    日本
    Posts
    6,499
    Rep Power
    28

    Default

    Originally Posted by Paul1355
    Frank Isola: Sources claim [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] He's no Brandon Jennings but I'll take him. [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]


    Again more rumors but we know the Knicks are not sold with Douglas as the starting PG. I like Douglas and think he will be a very good PG if he can be consistent on offense. BUT Luke Ridnour had one of his best seasons last year and is a very good distributor and outside shooter.

    Signing him to a MLE isn't a bad deal.

    Thoughts?
    We don't have/can't use the MLE cos we're under the cap. I'd say $4M maybe 5 tops per year for Ridnour.

  7. #7
    Evacuee Crazy⑧s's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    日本
    Posts
    6,499
    Rep Power
    28

    Default

    And I wouldn't be surprised if Douglas stepped in to lead role PG duties by next seasons end.

  8. #8
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    2,845
    Rep Power
    13

    Default

    Terrible. Agreed; Livingston is more logical. With Douglas in wings and worthy of serious consideration as a solution, why waste premium cheddar when Livingston would be dirt cheap, and dominates with upside. If he flames out or is injured; it's no biggie since we have Douglas, who, in his own right, is a worthy gamble to give the minutes too.

    A Livingston-Douglas combo is a superior bet.

    This seems especially horrible since the numbers being hinted at will rape our flexibility; from out n out signing possibilities, to sign n trading (Lee eg)

  9. #9
    Veteran mafra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,523
    Rep Power
    12

    Default

    I, too, am a BIG Livingston advocate. He's 6"7' and (I think) finally healthy again. HOWEVER, he is not a D'ant PG b/c he doesn't shoot the 3-point shot.

    Livingston is 6-for-32 from behind the arc IN HIS ENTIRE CAREER! Six made 3-pointers in 193 games. So, do we even need to ask the question....

    Personally, I love Luke Ridnour to run this offense. He could even turn out to be a Stev Nash-lite type player. Remember what D'ant did for Nash, after coming from DAL (and of course the change in rules disallowing hand-checking)....

    Put Luke in this system and we might have a star, especially if surrounded by a few max super-uber-stars.

    At the very least, Luke gives us insurance in case Douglas falters. I would feel very comfortable with Luke-Toney PG duo.

    As for Livingston. I would still give him a shot. He could be a combo guard for us. HE and Walker would be our scorers off the bench.

    If LJ goes elsewhere, I would prefer we sign one max free agent, resign Lee, and bring in 2-4 of these type of free agents.

    Ridnour, Salmons & Gomes is better than Amar'e right?

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    303
    Rep Power
    8

    Default

    I'd sign Livingston to be our slasher. He might not be able to shoot the ball, but it doesn't hurt to have a PG who can cut to the hole.

  11. #11
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    county of the kings
    Posts
    1,120
    Rep Power
    9

    Nyk Logo

    livingston on the cheap... the only way to get luke is to cut into payrol and id rather use that on others players since we dont got a mid level only vet min after we sign our FAs

  12. #12
    12th man
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Far far away from the orgy that consist of clyde, 8's, rady, smokes and rono
    Posts
    11,260
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Originally Posted by mafra
    I, too, am a BIG Livingston advocate. He's 6"7' and (I think) finally healthy again. HOWEVER, he is not a D'ant PG b/c he doesn't shoot the 3-point shot.

    Livingston is 6-for-32 from behind the arc IN HIS ENTIRE CAREER! Six made 3-pointers in 193 games. So, do we even need to ask the question....

    Personally, I love Luke Ridnour to run this offense. He could even turn out to be a Stev Nash-lite type player. Remember what D'ant did for Nash, after coming from DAL (and of course the change in rules disallowing hand-checking)....

    Put Luke in this system and we might have a star, especially if surrounded by a few max super-uber-stars.

    At the very least, Luke gives us insurance in case Douglas falters. I would feel very comfortable with Luke-Toney PG duo.

    As for Livingston. I would still give him a shot. He could be a combo guard for us. HE and Walker would be our scorers off the bench.

    If LJ goes elsewhere, I would prefer we sign one max free agent, resign Lee, and bring in 2-4 of these type of free agents.

    Ridnour, Salmons & Gomes is better than Amar'e right?
    Ridnour is no scrub, but he'll never be a star in the NBA.

    Nash always had all star ability/talent...he does moves that we don't see from other players. Nash's most powerful attribute is his brain. Ridnour no where near that level.


    IONO about Ridnour, short term yes, but I wouldn't call him the all might savior. C level PG.

  13. #13
    Member Pedro De Pacas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    169
    Rep Power
    10

    Default

    Great Backup and just the player we need to lead our second unit...assuming Lebron signs and TD is the starter at the point....

  14. #14
    Veteran OriginalKnickGrandson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    N.Y.
    Posts
    1,116
    Rep Power
    9

    Default

    I rather have Steve Blake

Similar Threads

  1. Knicks Nightmare
    By Starks_boy in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: Aug 17, 2009, 08:03
  2. Knicks at Magic 3/21 7PM
    By jpz17 in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: Mar 24, 2009, 10:06
  3. Replies: 29
    Last Post: Dec 31, 2008, 14:34
  4. Lampe signs with NY Knicks
    By KnickFan2080 in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: Jan 27, 2008, 23:17
  5. Ridnour to the Knicks rumor. Who would you trade?
    By donchris in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 39
    Last Post: Jan 25, 2008, 16:43

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •