Thank you for proving my point.
1. You were unable to disprove the fact that Gallinari shoots 42% from the field, despite being 6-10 and having a height advantage over most of his opponents.
<table class="statsHeader" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="742"> <tbody> <tr><td class="gSGSectionTitleStatsGrid" width="738"> Danilo Gallinari Season Averages
</td> <td width="2"></td></tr></tbody></table> <table class="playerStatTable careerAvg" border="1" bordercolor="#cccccc" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"> <tbody> <tr class="title"> <td class="year">Year</td> <td class="team">Team</td> <td>G</td> <td>GS</td> <td>MPG</td> <td>FG%</td> <td>3P%</td> <td>FT%</td> <td>OFF</td> <td>DEF</td> <td>RPG</td> <td>APG</td> <td>SPG</td> <td>BPG</td> <td>TO</td> <td>PF</td> <td>PPG</td></tr> <tr> <td class="yr">
</td> <td class="tm">
</td> <td>
</td> <td>
</td> <td>
</td> <td>
</td> <td>
</td> <td>
</td> <td>
</td> <td>
</td> <td>
</td> <td>
</td> <td>
</td> <td>
</td> <td>
</td> <td>
</td> <td>
</td></tr> <tr class="odd"> <td class="yr">09-10</td> <td class="tm">NYK</td> <td>81</td> <td>74</td> <td>33.9</td> <td>0.423</td> <td>0.381</td> <td>0.818</td> <td>0.8</td> <td>4.1</td> <td>4.9</td> <td>1.7</td> <td>0.9</td> <td>0.7</td> <td>1.36</td> <td>2.36</td> <td>15.1</td></tr></tbody></table>
2. You also were unable to disprove the fact that Gallinari is a crappy rebounder and shotblocker, averaging 4.9 rebounds in 34 MPG and .7 blocks in 34 MPG.
<table class="statsHeader" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="742"> <tbody> <tr><td class="gSGSectionTitleStatsGrid" width="738"> Career Season Averages
</td> <td width="2"></td></tr></tbody></table> <table class="playerStatTable careerAvg" border="1" bordercolor="#cccccc" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"> <tbody> <tr class="title"> <td class="year">Year</td> <td class="team">Team</td> <td>G</td> <td>GS</td> <td>MPG</td> <td>FG%</td> <td>3P%</td> <td>FT%</td> <td>OFF</td> <td>DEF</td> <td>RPG</td> <td>APG</td> <td>SPG</td> <td>BPG</td> <td>TO</td> <td>PF</td> <td>PPG</td></tr> <tr> <td class="yr">
</td> <td class="tm">
</td> <td>
</td> <td>
</td> <td>
</td> <td>
</td> <td>
</td> <td>
</td> <td>
</td> <td>
</td> <td>
</td> <td>
</td> <td>
</td> <td>
</td> <td>
</td> <td>
</td> <td>
</td></tr> <tr class="odd"> <td class="yr">09-10</td> <td class="tm">NYK</td> <td>81</td> <td>74</td> <td>33.9</td> <td>0.423</td> <td>0.381</td> <td>0.818</td> <td>0.8</td> <td>4.1</td> <td>4.9</td> <td>1.7</td> <td>0.9</td> <td>0.7</td> <td>1.36</td> <td>2.36</td> <td>15.1</td></tr></tbody></table>
3. Brook Lopez, Robin Lopez, Anthony Randolph, Jason Thompson, and Roy Hibbert all shoot better percentages, average more rebounds, and block more shots than Gallinari. Eric Gordon also shoots a better percentage and scores more points.
Brook Lopez >>>>> Danilo Gallinari
18.8 PPG, 8.6 rebounds, 1.7 blocks, 49.9% fg
http://www.nba.com/playerfile/brook_lopez/
Robin Lopez >> Danilo Gallinari
8.4 ppg, 4.9 rebounds, 1 block, 58% fg, 19.3 MPG
http://www.nba.com/playerfile/robin_lopez/Robin Lopez averages more rebounds and blocks in 15 MPG less than Gallinari. I guess Gallo got exposed for being a Gallina.
Anthony Randolph >>> Danilo Gallinari
11.6 ppg, 6.5 rebounds, 1.6 blocks, 44.3% fg, 22.7 MPG
Randolph averages more rebounds and blocks and shoots a better percentage, in 12 fewer MPG.
Jason Thompson > Danilo Gallinari
12.5 ppg, 8.5 rebounds, 1 block, 47% fg, 31.4 MPG
Thompson averages more rebounds and blocks and shoots a better percentage, in 3 less MPG.
Roy Hibbert > Danilo Gallinari
11.7 ppg, 5.7 rpg, 1.6 BPG, 49.5% fg 25 MPG
Hibbert averages more rebounds and blocks in 9 fewer MPG, and he shoots a better FG%.
Eric Gordon > Danilo Gallinari
16.9 ppg, 3 assists, 1.1 steals, 44.9% fg, 37% 3 PT
4. You were unable to disprove the fact that Gallinari is nothing more than a 3 point specialist.
Gallinari's field goal attempts, in the 2009-2010 season: 1,052
Gallinari's 3 pt attempts, in the 2009-2010 season: 560
53% of his attempts were from 3, and another 15% of his attempts were with his foot on the line, or with his feet one step above the 3 pt line.
In other words, 68% of Gallinari's shot attempts were from at least 20-28 feet away.
5. Gallinari = 3 PT Specialist
That's a powerful and versatile rebuttal, but you yourself agree that it's so low bc for much of the season his --role-- was to be there hitting the 3.
This isn't because its all he can do and what he's confined too.
He has good slashing for someone his size. And passing. And D. And his 3 pt specialty-like range.
He's --shown-- he can do all this. He --has-- taken over and won games by doing this.
Can't argue against that.
Can't argue against your season sat analysis either.
Except the stats are for a young player just doing his first full season for a cesspool team with no PG, no C, and a coach who had no game plan for the roster insofar as improvising and trying shit out here n there on whim.
Can't deny the stats. Can't say Gallo --is-- great or has been "better" than the others.
Can say he has the clear ability to be great, and own 99% of that draft class.
He's shown he can, especially down the stretch.