View Poll Results: Kurt Thomas for Jerry Stackhouse?

Voters
15. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    3 20.00%
  • No

    12 80.00%
  • it doesn't matter they're both good

    0 0%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 16

Thread: Kurt Thomas for Jerry Stackhouse

  1. #1
    Veteran JJtheKnick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    1,220
    Rep Power
    12

    Default Kurt Thomas for Jerry Stackhouse

    i like the trade. in a nut shell the knicks need a shooter and stackhouse is a very good one.

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    jerzy
    Posts
    55
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    i think they should trade him 4 someone like webber. jerry is already injured so he might not recover.

  3. #3
    Superstar WiL8000's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    529
    Rep Power
    11

    Default

    Stackhouse and Webber are both injured. You have to ask, who is a better player, despite injuries.

  4. #4
    Veteran JJtheKnick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    1,220
    Rep Power
    12

    Default

    stackhouse is healthy now he played most of the season. he played like normal but his #s were a lil down because he dident play as much because the coach is dumb. stackhouse is fin and webbers not.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    226
    Rep Power
    11

    Default

    stackhouse is not a good shooter, hes a slasher type player and i dont really see where he can fit in the team with houston and tim thomas, if ur looking for this trade then they just shoulda kept sprewell, very similar players xcept spree is more healthy and plays better D, and in addition jjtheknick, why do u think everyone is a good shooter? lol

  6. #6
    Veteran JJtheKnick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    1,220
    Rep Power
    12

    Default

    what? i never said that. i say stackhouse is a good shooter because his #s show it. he is a very good player and would help the knicks

  7. #7
    Your Best Bet is B Ez datruth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    new york
    Posts
    1,553
    Rep Power
    12

    Default

    yo for get stackhouse man ....dont get me wrong i hope we get him but if we trade kurt for him that means there will be another trade that will happen cause we not going to have allan houston who get paid 19 million coming off the bench .....if we get him i think isiah will trade stachhouse cause tim did a good job so it might be a 3 team trade

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Brooklyn
    Posts
    202
    Rep Power
    11

    Default

    Easy choice for me I would much prefer Webber, we need a big man even if Webber isn't as healthy as he was, imagine how good he would be against the East. Whats the hardest competition Jermaine Oneal? I think thats the hardest opponent he would have to face, webber would definitly be an all star and average 20-23 points in the east. We already have Houston and and even if hes not healthy then Penny, then Demarr I don't see the need for Stackhouse.

  9. #9
    Veteran JJtheKnick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    1,220
    Rep Power
    12

    Default

    stackhouse can be great for this team just look at his #s

    [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

  10. #10
    Member TrueBlue20's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Brooklyn
    Posts
    332
    Rep Power
    11

    Default

    Originally Posted by JJtheKnick
    stackhouse can be great for this team just look at his #s

    [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
    Putting up good numbers on a team doesn't necessarily mean that he'll be good for the Knicks. Look at Glen Rice. He always had good numbers but he just was able to produce in the Knicks' offense.

    We really don't need Stackhouse here. We already have too much players playing his position. What we need is a decent PF

  11. #11
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    9
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    We should trade Kurt Thomas for Jerry Stackhouse and then trade Stackhouse including other players for Chris Webber.

  12. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    www.clublakers.com
    Posts
    96
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Stackhouse is too inconsistent and injury-prone. This guy only played 26 games last season.

  13. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    286
    Rep Power
    11

    Default

    i'd put Stack at the bottom of my list.. go for the big men first..

  14. #14
    Veteran JJtheKnick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    1,220
    Rep Power
    12

    Default

    i agree go for a big man first but if the offer comes up i say do it.

  15. #15
    Administrator rady's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Romania
    Posts
    3,813
    Rep Power
    10

    Default

    May God help the Knicks if we lose Kurt for Stackhouse.
    Kurt's fifteen footer is money and everyone knows it.
    Stack is full of injuries and the Knicks need productive help right away.

Similar Threads

  1. Kurt Thomas and his dunking
    By Brian_Coleman_21 in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: Apr 02, 2005, 20:00
  2. Kurt Thomas
    By Brian_Coleman_21 in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: Mar 01, 2005, 06:38
  3. Kurt Thomas article
    By rady in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: Oct 06, 2004, 17:46
  4. Wally for kurt thomas
    By rick700 in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: Sep 20, 2004, 14:37
  5. Kurt Thomas
    By SpreeFan in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Mar 29, 2003, 06:17

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •