This is an interesting theory!!!The 09 Knick roster were 41+ win roster without DNP Dantoni
The 2009 Knicks were twice as better than the 2010 Knick roster
just put together by so many facts/reasons.
A) the majority of our 09 roster were expiring contract veterans
fit n ready to put in a winning regular season to up grade their FA market value.
B) Starting C-Darko and SG-Hughes for 82 games wouldve put PF-David Lee
and SF-Wilson Chandler into their respected positions as starters with a
halfcourt starting PG-Duhon to give the Knicks a winning edge over alot of
teams we were suppose to sweep for the season.
C) The Knicks deep depth bench were our most important weapon in the
09 season with Nate/Gallo/Harrington/Jefferies/Hill/Douglas (those bench
players alone) wouldve pulled out 29+ wins by having a high scoring bench
when u add the bench wins with the wins of our expiring-contract starters
u will come up with a 41+ win season of players.
D) And when u take-in the consideration of the 32 win 2008 season roster
being apart of the 2009 season roster ..... u do add on more wins than
the previous 32 win season when the 2009 roster include the missing
players (center/SG) that were not on the 2008 roster.....
E) Do u actually think Mr. Owner James Dolan and his up-stairs consultant
will let Donnie Walsh stand still while celebrity coach Damntoni "DNP" six
(6) healthy players in the 2010-11 regular season? again?
F) So the Knicks having a better win season in the 2010-11 season
than they had in the 2008 and 2009 season will not be better-players
it will be the short rope around Walsh/Damntoni necks on the line.
I feel like I've seen this a few times though....