First off I love the Thread
But....Harrington better than Randolph! I know Randolph is still unproven, but Al Harrington is a scorer (albeit a pretty affective one) but nothing more than that, Randolph will produce (even without reaching his maxium potential) than Al Harrington would.
Plus your PF comparison should be Amare vs. Harrington in which case the advantage cleary goes to New Knicks
and the Center comparison she be comparing Lee and Turiaf, while Lee is a better rebounder and overall offensive player, Tariaf is a much better defender
So by my scoring it goes
SF:advantage 2010 simply because we have to assume that Gallo will be better
6th man: draw simply because what Randolph can produce compared to what Nate did produce is unknown....but you have to imagine Randolph shouldnt be the headache Nate was for us.
Bench:Adv. 2010 Toney Douglas and Azebuke represent a better tandon than Hughes and Jefferies Mozgov should produce more than Jordan Hill or certainley Millic.
There is not one area where we were better in 2009
2010 is going to be better....but 2009 only won 29 games so how much is that really saying!?