KnicksWillRiseAgain
Superstar
we can always throw in Walker or Tdog and 2 Second round picks?The main problem is that our future 1st rd pick is worthless to DEN right now. 2014! We'll be a regular playoff team by then.
we can always throw in Walker or Tdog and 2 Second round picks?The main problem is that our future 1st rd pick is worthless to DEN right now. 2014! We'll be a regular playoff team by then.
The Nets arent a problem. and all the Rockets can offer is cap room.
If The nets were to make a trade for Mello they would be giving up most of there good pieces (Devin Harris, Brook Lopez) and Carmello wouldnt agree to it.
The Rockets would just offer expiring contracts.
The Magic havent even made any offers for Carmelo but if they did it weould be Vince Carter's expiring and Jammer Nelson. The Nuggets already have a PG and dont need Nelson.
Our deal of Chandler or Gallo with Curry's expiring 12 mill and a first round pick is better then all the other deals if you ask me.
The Knicks are believed to be at the top of Carmelo Anthony's list of preferred destinations, but New York may not have the assets to make a deal.
"What do they have?" a source close to the Nuggets told the New York Daily News. "That makes it tough."
Reports have indicated that the Knicks could offer the expiring contract of Eddy Curry, a future first-round pick and Danilo Gallinari.
However, the Knicks may try to sell Denver on Wilson Chandler over Gallinari if they make an offer.
The Nets, Bulls, Rockets and Magic have been mentioned as potential destinations for Anthony as well.
Read more: http://realgm.com/src_wiretap_archi...ve_assets_to_trade_for_carmelo/#ixzz0x58xmPqU
The Nets can put together a much better package than the Knicks. Just look at the Nets roster. I?ll entertain you and put together a package. Damion James, who is a really solid prospect and I really think he went under the radar because he isn?t a ?sexy? pick, Devin Harris and Travis Outlaw. If Denver asked for Troy Murphy to substitute Outlaw, the Knicks would have to add Gallinari and Randolph to compete. The Nets don?t even need to add a pick. Comparing that package to Gallinari, Curry and a first rounder is a joke! The Knicks will have to gut the team to compete with the Nets, assuming the Nets are serious and I bet you they are, especially considering they lost out on all the FAs. Never underestimate your opponents. Teams have ?stolen? players from other teams because a team was considered frontrunner for a trade and acted like a trade was going to go through and some superstar player was theirs. So what if the Knicks are a frontrunner? It doesn?t mean anything. Nothing is guaranteed. And I have a bad feeling about this.
screw that melo is great but he is also stubborn and not a team player just think about the way his team mates talked about him during the playoffs last year, id rather get parker and keep galo then get melo... i believe in this season galo will be close to as good as an all star and him parker and amare could be a big 3 i personally think galo is better then chris bosh and those 3 would be better then miami's big 3
Who cares?
If we don't have enough to satisfy Denver, then we don't give up anything. We sign him next summer. Denver gets nothing. This is actually the scenario I prefer the most.
Denver can't trade him to the best bidder. Melo has a no trade clause in his contract. He can turn down any destination he wants. Melo has most of the power here. Plus, not many teams are going to make offers knowing that Melo may not resign with them. No team wants to give up assets for a 1 year rental.
And if he gets traded somewhere else, the I'm fine with that too. It's better than depleting our entire roster for him. Gallo + Randolph is better than Melo alone.
Overall, none of this matters and we really needn't worry about it.
Who cares?
If we don't have enough to satisfy Denver, then we don't give up anything. We sign him next summer. Denver gets nothing. This is actually the scenario I prefer the most.
Denver can't trade him to the best bidder. Melo has a no trade clause in his contract. He can turn down any destination he wants. Melo has most of the power here. Plus, not many teams are going to make offers knowing that Melo may not resign with them. No team wants to give up assets for a 1 year rental.
And if he gets traded somewhere else, the I'm fine with that too. It's better than depleting our entire roster for him. Gallo + Randolph is better than Melo alone.
Overall, none of this matters and we really needn't worry about it.
good point, this is why we would have to throw in another player or two....maybe Walker and Chandler...something like that Denver would want.The main problem is that our future 1st rd pick is worthless to DEN right now. 2014! We'll be a regular playoff team by then.
good point, this is why we would have to throw in another player or two....maybe Walker and Chandler...something like that Denver would want.