Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 29

Thread: Felton Or Jennings? Randolph Or Hill? Lee Or Stat?

  1. #1
    Evacuee Crazy⑧s's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    日本
    Posts
    6,488
    Rep Power
    27

    Default Felton Or Jennings? Randolph Or Hill? Lee Or Stat?

    The Jefferies trade made a Felton signing possible.

    We lost Hill in the trade with a 1st rounder as well.

    We drafted Hill ahead of Jennings.

    We acquired Randolph in the S&T for Lee.

    The S&T for Lee made STAT a Knickerbocker.

    There has been so much whinging that still, after a whole off-season, rears its ugly head on occasion. So, I'm going to be keeping a close watch on these players.

    -Felton VS Jennings will be the focal.

    -Randolph VS Hill will be interesting.

    -Lee VS STAT should be a bit of a wash for STAT - hopefully - if he can scrape up some more dimes and boards.




    ☆This goes without mentioning the stealthy signing of The Gov and the 37th pick swindle of Sir Landry Fields Esq.

    Two fantastic signings.

    All in all, have we really done so incredibly poorly? Some say yes, some say no.

    I say...... We've done pretty bloody well.

    Defence is back in O&B.

  2. #2
    Member serendipity10's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    near the lincoln tunnel in Union City, NJ staying close to MSG
    Posts
    449
    Rep Power
    5

    Default

    Jennings, but Felton is still a great pickup.

    Hard to say. I would choose Randolph because I know what he is capable of. Hill is a question mark.

    As much as I like Lee, Amare is better.

  3. #3
    Member keyser soze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    bay area, california
    Posts
    391
    Rep Power
    5

    Default

    STAT > Lee

    Randolph > Hill

    Jennings = Felton (I personally think Jennings is considerably overrated)

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    95
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    We got Amare. That's all that matters.

  5. #5
    Evacuee Crazy⑧s's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    日本
    Posts
    6,488
    Rep Power
    27

    Default

    Originally Posted by cathaytrader
    We got Amare. That's all that matters.
    I thought he was horrible tonight.

  6. #6
    Superstar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    683
    Rep Power
    10

    Default Jennings v. Holiday

    Jennings would certainly have been a better pick than Hill and I expect Jennings to have a very solid career. I believe that there is a good chance, however, that within two years we will regret having passed on Jrue Holiday rather than having passed on Jennings.

  7. #7
    Evacuee Crazy⑧s's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    日本
    Posts
    6,488
    Rep Power
    27

    Default

    Man. Lee went for 0 points, 5 TOs, 2 assists, 3 boards and a -29 VS LA tonight. That's woeful.

  8. #8
    Sexy Stud knickzrulezH20's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    1,781
    Rep Power
    8

    Default

    You replace Lee for STAT and we'd be screwed. Guys like Felton, Chandler, Walker, "Gallo" (supposed to be but he looks awful as of now) are benefiting by STAT getting tripled team. If Lee was here, Chandler and Felton would not have games this big. STAT gets the utmost respect from teams. Right now he's still learning on the fly how to handle being completely targeted when on offence. STAT will be a high turnover guy until we get Melo, but once he gets his knack he'll easily average 25 plus nightly.

  9. #9
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,792
    Rep Power
    10

    Default

    I mean, we passed on Darren Collison and look how that turned out...

  10. #10
    is the Bo$$ Toons's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Bahamas
    Posts
    2,379
    Rep Power
    12

    Default

    Originally Posted by SSj4Wingzero
    I mean, we passed on Darren Collison and look how that turned out...
    how? collison will fail in a system where the players are used to being spoon fed from CP3.....collison will fade into black if he doesnt ahve a rondo type game...and soon,.

  11. #11
    Veteran quiggle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,246
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    you ain't going to find a night "The Future" will score 0 points against the Lakers.

  12. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    113
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Felton > Jennings. Jennings has athletic talent but he's not a smart player. Anyone that shoots as badly as he does should recognize that he's hurting the team by shooting so much no matter how many PPG he gets. The fact that he keeps shooting is screaming that he's a "me first" kind of player that does not understand the game. Right now he's Marbury and Iverson light - talented players that could not win because they never learned how to play basketball.

    Lee > Amare - Amare is the much better scorer, but Lee is the better rebounder, play maker, turns the ball over much less often, and actually steals it more often. The problem with Lee is that you need a good defensive C to play with him because he's undersized and not long. If you have that though, it's close, but Lee is hair better.

    Randolph > Hill - This is not even close. Randolph is a very good rebounder and shot blocker (check his per 36 minutes stats in Golden State), much better athlete, several years younger, taller, longer, better ball handler, better passer etc... He just needs some time. He's very young and lost most of last year.

  13. #13
    is the Bo$$ Toons's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Bahamas
    Posts
    2,379
    Rep Power
    12

    Default

    [QUOTE=Italian Stallion;139849]Felton > Jennings. Jennings has athletic talent but he's not a smart player. QUOTE]

    Bull****, complete and utter bull****. Bjennings is much better, a better passer, he's faster, younger, and is a rebounding PG that will have a jason kiddesque career

  14. #14
    Veteran p0nder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    1,323
    Rep Power
    10

    Default

    ^man, i can not understand how anyone would say that Lee is better then STAT. the guy is a perrennial all-star with decent play on both sides of the ball. as far as a 1 vs 1 comparrison goes, STAT is going to blow lee's numbers out of the water, while providing us much better defense. If we put them on the court, 1v1 who do u think would win?

    the other two comparrisons i'm less sure about. I think Randolph is the better player right now, but we'll see where these guys develop.

    and jennings v felton, i would say felton Right now but we'll see how jennings does as he learns the game. I think he is highly overrated right now and will end up a career backup pg. but we'll see.

  15. #15
    Superstar richtree's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Dirty Jersey
    Posts
    513
    Rep Power
    6

    Default

    The Rockets exercised Jordan Hill's 3rd year of his contract but he doesn't see the floor in Hourston.


    We could probably have him back for peanuts because you know the Rockets are trying to package him out soon.

Similar Threads

  1. NYKnicks.com Interview Raymond Felton
    By Crazy⑧s in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: Sep 19, 2010, 15:53
  2. Replies: 29
    Last Post: Sep 17, 2010, 09:46
  3. Randolph for Lee...article from GSW writer
    By metrocard in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: Jul 13, 2010, 01:15
  4. I Told You So!!!
    By TR1LL10N in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: Nov 19, 2009, 17:52
  5. can eddie and zach mix?
    By insomniac in forum NY Knicks
    Replies: 119
    Last Post: Nov 25, 2008, 21:19

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •