Ok Crazy8s,
You can start to spew insults because you don't have any retort to my points.
And I'm not "doctoring" my points. There's a difference between you not knowing what i'm talking about and me having to clarify for your edification, and me needing to sort my own points out. I knew what I meant. You either knew what I meant about Nash being average, or acted like you didn't know. I suspect it's the latter. It's obvious that he wasn't merely an okay player in hindsight.
Then I try to clarify what I meant for your 'understanding' and you call it doctoring. Oh well. You still haven't addressed the central idea -- that Nash had the potential in him he just had to get w the right coach and system; and that a similar unification is happening with Felton, this system and our coach. You have no arguement for that fact. Your perception is flawed and instead of admitting it, your resorting to insults and saying i'm playing w the pieces of my argument. Weak bro.
You actually said i'm throwing praise at the coach,lol?! Seriously?? This whole premise of this thread is to give props to Felton you moron.
Let me explain something to you, when I say Felton needs the system or our coach,it's not a knock on Felton. Players skills are inhibited or allowed to flourish depending on how they are used in the respective system they happen to be in. We've seen this already w Felton have we not? He played w Larry Brown, a coach who insists on slowing it down, taking time off the clock, who doesn't allow a lot of freelancing in his system. Mike D's system is uninhibiting in all of the above ways. Can you refute that? Or do you just want to hurl more insults? Why Felton needing the system is not a knock is because he has the talent. He is more able to show it in the SSOL though. The figurative shakles Brown had on him are off now. You prolly still don't get it..
Oh Jesus, enough with the patronisation. You're trying so hard when all I've said is that you've over done the Nash thing. Get over yourself, Ron. Jesus.
I agree with/have never said otherwise about Raymond's numbers improving under D'Antoni. And if you think anything you say is beyond me, ばかやろう. I never said Nash didn't perform better under MD either.
Feel free to show where I have done.
You say silly things in your attempts to profess intelligence. Not saying you're stupid, of course, but you get caught up in the attempt. The whole
Nash was average in Dallas is heinous. And again, the whole 'game on paper' poop in regard to Nash is ridiculous as well. In his last year as a Mav, he was the on court leader of the NBA's best team. He had great numbers in the playoffs, he was widely referred to as a top 5 PG and that's why Phoenix offered in excess of $60M.
The bottom line was/has always been, that the whole Nash bullshit has to stop on this site. It's lame. And it all comes from you. Like you said: 'Felton will never be like Nash', so what's the point in bringing Nash in to it in the first place? Comparisons are unavoidable, but, as I say, they're futile. Give the dude [and me] a rest.
And stop trying so hard.
eace:
