True. But it's funnier how cats ride Gallo's dik like actually dreaming it is, and think games we lose show we are necessarily better w/o him. This was a dose of reality crashing in on aberrations (Spurs shooting game). But stupid to wonder whether a guy who can score 20 in 10min off outside shooting, and get to the line 15x and ice them, at 6'10 have helped when we shoot horribly(from the line, too) and lacked clutchness at the end...
What would Gallo do in the LAK game? Score and shoot well, holmes. (a) main reason we lost.
What could Gallo have done to help...Damn. The same thing he did to Garnett and Glen Davis? Tempt me to bring up more 4/5 team duos Gallo has feasted against and won or kept us in contetion against.
Que Samuel L. Jackson begging a fool to say 'what' again son he can cap his ass.
Anyways, again, LAK are better and prolly have the most lethal bigs in the nba. Let's not fool ourselves. You don't overcome a team's strength to trotting out majorly inferior players n try to match up as a focus. Especially when you're overall weaker. You just lose. Gracefully and conventionally n traditionally. But you lose. You win, or have best % of a 'lucky' win by playing to your best strength n potential trump card, if you have one. We have one, IMHO.
Last edited by iSaYughh; Jan 11, 2011 at 11:40.
The knick bench of walker, douglas, mozgov turiaf (and sean williams) 7 of 21
and 13 rebs collectively.
If we had a bigger body to put on lamar, there is NO WAY he gets 18 boards. Odom got all those boards on pure length.
Secondly gallo frees up space against a long team. We were down 7 in the 4th quarter. So yes, i feel gallo would have made a difference against the lakers.
The I will concede that if we had Gallo his shooting "might" have helped us, as he tends to be streaky. Otherwise what we got from Shawne Williams is almost as much as we would have got out of Gallo.
sick ass thread.
artest is a ****in fa99it! fake ass *****aaaaa.