Why should I have to be the one to start the open discussion when you ran from your posts and assertions?
Where was the point in the other discussion when you backed up the following assertion: "I stated only facts." in reference to your coach-player-confidence algorithm. Which post was that, where you explained how you arrived at said "facts"? How you arrived at said numbers? Under what "factual basis" beyond your own opinion and guessing did you come with to explain why you got 60%, and not 50%, or 40%, or 62.4%, or 53.1%?
If you answer these questions, and prove you are willing to engage in debate and actually listen to the other side of the argument (which you proved you are not willing to do), I will engage you. Otherwise, it's a waste of time.
One more thing. Does MDA's track record mean anything at all to you? The fact that he never coached an effective defensive team. The fact that he was fired because top brass felt he didnt have his team concentrate enough on the defensive end. None of this raises a red flag for you when you try to pin our defensive deficiencies on our players?