PDA

View Full Version : Member status



Pages : [1] 2

jayp
Feb 25, 2004, 09:50
when does the status of a member(Rookie, Sixth Man..etc) change? Is it related to the number of posts?

rady
Feb 25, 2004, 10:05
yes, the ranks are related to the number of posts

0-49 posts = Rookie
40-99 posts = Starter
100-199 posts = 12th man
200-299 posts = 6th man
300-499 posts = All Star
500+ = Veteran

jayp
Feb 25, 2004, 10:32
thanks, im hoping to be a veteran soon.. :)

jayp
Feb 25, 2004, 10:33
oh yeah, 1 more thing.. why is 12th man and 6th man require more posts than starter? just curious :)

rady
Feb 25, 2004, 10:51
oh, what was i thinking when i created those ranks?? :wallbash: and how come no one noticed this before?
thanks for your observation, i'll fix it right away.

btw, if you can gimme new ideas of ranks instead of these ones.. lemme no

untill then, we stick with what we have:

0-49 posts = Rookie
50-99 posts = 12th man
100-199 posts = 6th man
200-299 posts = Starter
300-499 posts = All Star
500+ = Veteran

Only The Knicks
Mar 08, 2004, 16:15
The rankings are so difficult!! If I had 198 posts I would be a 6th man!!!! URG!

e_D
Mar 08, 2004, 17:10
how bout Injured List in place of rookie, and rookie in place of 12th man?

BryantDunkGiant
Mar 08, 2004, 17:39
I hate to screw it up even more, but shouldn't All-Star be higher than Veteran?

There's a lot of veterans, but not all of them have made the AllStar team

jayp
Mar 08, 2004, 19:13
for my 100th post (making me a 6th man :hump: ), how bout adding in a hall of fame or superstar for the highest status? and when they reach the highest status they can get privileges that the other members don't have (i dunno what they are but it sounds good anyway :P )

rady
Mar 09, 2004, 02:30
Ok, this is how we're going to do:
I'll let you all think, and post here the way you'd like to be ranked
The title and the minumum number of posts
what you say? ;)

BryantDunkGiant
Mar 09, 2004, 19:59
My opinion:

0-49 posts = Rookie
50-99 posts = 12th man
100-199 posts = 6th man
200-299 posts = Veteran
300-499 posts = Starter
500+ = All-Star

1000+ = LA Laker

Haha just playin about the last one-- I gotta represent for my team ;) . But that's how I think it should go.

Swishfm3
Mar 25, 2004, 19:16
**going of the Laker fans format but a little harder**

0-49 posts = Rookie
50-99 posts = 12th man
100-199 posts = 6th man
200-499 posts = Starter
500-999= All-Star
1000 - 1499 = NBA first team
1500+ = Hall of Fame

BryantDunkGiant
Mar 25, 2004, 23:13
Yeah, you know what I like SwishFm's because after a while once everyone reached 500 posts, the ratings won't mean anything.

This is my revised version:

0-49 posts = Rookie
50-99 posts = 12th man
100-199 posts = 6th man
200-499 posts = Veteran
500-999= Starter
1000 - 1499 = All-Star
1500 - 1999 = NBA First Team
2000+ - MVP

I think you should take out "Hall of Fame" and maybe do something separate with that.

rady
Mar 26, 2004, 08:48
both ideas are great, but let's have some funny ranks like towel boy, or other that prove how much you really like the knicks, like fan, die-hard fan, orange&blue bleeder...

BryantDunkGiant
Mar 28, 2004, 02:02
How about:

"Spike Lee's Doorman"

or maybe even...

"Reggie Miller"

rady
Mar 28, 2004, 05:39
i have this crazy ideea:
1-4 posts: Scott Layden Fan :lol:

Only The Knicks
Mar 29, 2004, 14:48
That would be good... but don't have Hall Of Fame because that gives off the idea that you are old and out of the league...

Only The Knicks
Mar 30, 2004, 19:55
Also, I hate screwing it up MORE, but shouldn't Rookie be higher than 12th man? I mean if I'm a rookie I could be LeBron or Carmelo, so I'm better than a 12th man... Just a suggestion ;)

AJD
Mar 30, 2004, 20:07
Also, I hate screwing it up MORE, but shouldn't Rookie be higher than 12th man? I mean if I'm a rookie I could be LeBron or Carmelo, so I'm better than a 12th man... Just a suggestion ;)

Rookie by definition is: novice. A 12th man may not be great. But he is most likely not a novice.

rady
Mar 31, 2004, 03:39
more ideeas needed
i thought about Knick Fan, Diehard fan we just need to figure out the minimum and maximum number of posts for each

Only The Knicks
Mar 31, 2004, 14:48
Also, I hate screwing it up MORE, but shouldn't Rookie be higher than 12th man? I mean if I'm a rookie I could be LeBron or Carmelo, so I'm better than a 12th man... Just a suggestion ;)

Rookie by definition is: novice. A 12th man may not be great. But he is most likely not a novice.

Where do you hear this crap?

AJD
Apr 04, 2004, 09:23
Also, I hate screwing it up MORE, but shouldn't Rookie be higher than 12th man? I mean if I'm a rookie I could be LeBron or Carmelo, so I'm better than a 12th man... Just a suggestion ;)

Rookie by definition is: novice. A 12th man may not be great. But he is most likely not a novice.

Where do you hear this crap?
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=rookie

rady
Apr 15, 2004, 12:45
what do you think of these ones?

Layden Fan or Mascot 0-4
Newbie 5-24
Benchwarmer 25-49
Rookie 50-74
Knick Fan 75-99
12th man 100-129
Knick Lover 130-169
6th man 170-209
Starter 210-249
Diehard Fan 250-299
Superstar 300-349
MVP 350-499
Hall of Famer 500

comments?

pyotrveliky
Apr 15, 2004, 22:31
sounds good....

p

jayp
Apr 16, 2004, 09:55
knick lover and diehard fan seem the same to me but its all good..

rady
Apr 16, 2004, 12:54
Knows the Team instead of Knick Lover
how's that?

frankwilliams
Apr 16, 2004, 18:04
**going of the Laker fans format but a little harder**

0-49 posts = Rookie
50-99 posts = 12th man
100-199 posts = 6th man
200-499 posts = Starter
500-999= All-Star
1000 - 1499 = NBA first team
1500+ = Hall of Fame


straight up. i agree.

rady
Apr 17, 2004, 05:42
i also agree with Swishfm3's idea but i wanted to have a variety of all kind of ranks that aren't to hard to reach

frankwilliams
Apr 17, 2004, 08:02
i also agree with Swishfm3's idea but i wanted to have a variety of all kind of ranks that aren't to hard to reach

that's also true but you should think about his idea.

frankwilliams
Apr 17, 2004, 08:03
i have this crazy ideea:
1-4 posts: Scott Layden Fan :lol:



LMAO :lol:

allan20
Apr 17, 2004, 08:13
that layden fan status will force the new members to post at least 5 messages. what an ideea .. :)

frankwilliams
Apr 17, 2004, 08:20
that layden fan status will force the new members to post at least 5 messages. what an ideea .. :)

lol no one wants to be a scott layden fan.

pyotrveliky
Apr 17, 2004, 08:27
thats cuz there are NO scott layden fans (in their rite minds)

p

frankwilliams
Apr 17, 2004, 08:30
thats cuz there are NO scott layden fans (in their rite minds)

p

but why does everyone hate scott layden? its not like he did anything to hurt the knicks organization...........................lol :lol:

pyotrveliky
Apr 17, 2004, 22:22
haha if ur not kidding ill literally rip ur head off and feed it 2 a homeless person

:bat: :evil: :moon: :twisted: :idea:

BryantDunkGiant
Apr 19, 2004, 15:13
haha if ur not kidding ill literally rip ur head off and feed it 2 a homeless person

:bat: :evil: :moon: :twisted: :idea:Won't work-- didn't Rudy G throw out all of em from NYC?

:lol:

frankwilliams
Apr 19, 2004, 18:49
haha if ur not kidding ill literally rip ur head off and feed it 2 a homeless person

:bat: :evil: :moon: :twisted: :idea:


fiesty one.

pyotrveliky
Apr 19, 2004, 22:55
so i take it ur kidding??!?!?!

pyotrveliky
Apr 19, 2004, 22:56
haha i stole ur sig and ur MAD :evil:

btw im trying 2 get 2 100 posts so i can be a 6th man!!! hence the 2x post lol

pyo

Only The Knicks
Jun 12, 2004, 19:34
So Rady, what exactly are the current rankings?