A true SG that can be a go-to scorer, or a shotblocking, defensive, rebounding center? What should we be concentrated on in the draft?
_______√ictory_______;83515 said:Camby and Tyson chandler are possibilities donnie should explore.
i think we can actually get them.that would be my ideal frontline for 2010,
(other than possibly drafting thabeet or monroe)and we can get them now.
D'antoni needs to let danilo and chandler play together more
so they can get assimilated with one another.
if they are our future sg/sf, they should start building that chemistry.
We need a Defensive Coordinator Coach to go alongside of No-D Dantoni coaching style....before we add any new player to this Knick-Roster....recall our coaching-staff the past 5 years were actually ten times worst than our players....one on one individual-players performance b/c we had no team-chemistry on defense or offense being coached by the staff.
Coach Dantoni got us passing and moving the ball around to at least find the open man....even if the open man is at the 3-point line we are able to find him.
However....our defensive setup is poor poor poor allowing teams to score above 110 a game. We are playing with chemistry on offense....but.....we dont want to become another Phoenix Suns team that lose the big contest b/c of lack of defense. Last Night Game.... Knicks at Portland was enough proof to prove where we are headed without a "Defensive coordinator coach" on our coaching staff.
David Lee stated "no one was told we had a foul to give in the final 4 seconds during the time-out".
Dantoni-Fans I know u r out there....and u believe Dantoni cant do no-wrong....but the Portland game showed 48 minutes of Knick coaching incompetence.
1. Everyone in the NBA needs a defensive big except the Celtics/Cavs
2. Dampier is done
3. I know you like my trades, I never said they will happened. Just realistic/fair trade suggestions. If you want to argue against that, try your best.
4. Thanks for stating the obvious, yawn.
5. If if if...most realstic trade of Nate is for another guard...big men are not easy to get in the NBA...forget about Nate being traded for a good big man...you make no sense, you're not naming players, just keep bringing up this fantasy "good" big man we never heard of. When you come with sources, rumors and substances...then next time your post would actually be interesting.
6. We have a decent big man. David Lee.
7. You're dismissed.
Camby maybe, Clippers got a decent big man in Kaman already, contract nicely matches up with some of ours too.
Chandler I don't think so, Hornets are going pretty strong this year and I don't see them wanting to give up a 26 yr old 7'1 center who's pretty good.
rumor has it the hornets owner is having financial trouble, which is the reason why their have been the rumors of trading chandler.
i'd trade lee and rose for tyson in a heartbeat.
New Orleans Hornets
<table class="tablehead" style="clear: both;" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tbody><tr class="colhead"><th colspan="2">Incoming Players</th></tr><tr class="oddrow"><td width="35"></td><td valign="top">Malik Rose
Salary: $7,647,500 Years Remaining: 1
PTS: 1.6 REB: 1.9 AST: 0.5 PER: -3.26
</td></tr><tr class="oddrow"><td width="35"></td><td valign="top">David Lee
Salary: $1,788,033 Years Remaining: 1
PTS: 16.2 REB: 11.8 AST: 1.9 PER: 18.76
</td></tr></tbody></table>
Outgoing Players: Tyson ChandlerNew York Knicks
<table class="tablehead" style="clear: both;" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tbody><tr class="colhead"><th colspan="2">Incoming Players</th></tr><tr class="oddrow"><td width="35"></td><td valign="top">Tyson Chandler
Salary: $11,350,000 Years Remaining: 3
PTS: 8.8 REB: 8.3 AST: 0.5 PER: 14.18
</td></tr></tbody></table>
Outgoing Players: Malik Rose, David Lee
A defensive coach isn't gonna do much when your players all suck at defense.
The players should know if they have a foul to give or not. If they didn't know, they should ask. It's common sense, you can't blame the players not knowing they had a foul to give on the coach. It's the players job to be aware of that.